Cem Ilkel vs David Poljak Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W W W L L L
Form
W L W W W L W W W LHead To Head: Ilkel 2 - 0 Poljak
They have played 5 sets in total, with Ilkel winning 4 and Poljak winning 1. The last match between Ilkel and Poljak was at the M25 Sharm ElSheikh, 16-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Hard, with Cem Ilkel getting the victory 6-7(3) 7-6(4) 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Cem Ilkel | 2 |
| David Poljak | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M25 Sharm ElSheikh(16-04-2025)
Cem Ilkel
David Poljak
6
7
7
6
6
3
| Ilkel | Stats | Poljak |
|---|---|---|
| 74% (29-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 70% (21-9) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 527 | Ranking | 896 |
| 144 | Highest Rank | 370 |
| 29 | Age | 29 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 7 | Titles | 6 |
| 57% (437-336) | Career Total W/L | 55% (342-278) |
| $225,530 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Rybakina VS Bencic PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Krejcikova VS Maria PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(3) 7-6(4) 6-3 |
Stats 
Cem Ilkel
Player
David Poljak
61%
(
62 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
68 of
110)
9
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
47 of
68)
64%
(
25 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
30%
(
30 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
41 of
110)
112
Total Points Won
99
|
||||
| 6-3 7-6(2) |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
David Poljak
55%
(
39 of
71)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
4
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
8
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 32 | Games Won | 25 |
| 13 | Aces (Total) | 13 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 11 |
| 2:6:58 | Average Match Time | 2:6:58 |
| 59% (101/172) | 1st Serve % | 60% (111/185) |
| 74% (75/101) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (77/111) |
| 61% (43/71) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (34/74) |
| 38% (6/16) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 31% (4/13) |
| 40% (74/185) | Return Points Win % | 31% (54/172) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 67% (2/3) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ilkel vs Poljak Match Preview :
Ah, the charming realm of tennis statistics, where numbers tell tales more thrilling than a Federer-Nadal final! When you look at the second serve performances in the past six months, it's a bit like comparing a reliable sedan to a bicycle with a wobbly wheel. Ilkel has managed to win 45.79% of his points, while Poljak, with a bit more wobble, secured 42.59% on his second serve. It's akin to those points in Scrabble that decide who gets the last laugh.
Turning our attention to return game stats, Ilkel has been operating with all the precision of a Swiss watch when it comes to his rivals' second serve, winning 40.56% of the points. Poljak, on the other hand, seems to be inching ahead by pocketing 43.76% in recent form. Their first serve return percentages aren't far behind either, with Ilkel clocking in at 25.8% and Poljak close behind at 25.18%. It's like a game of chess, where only those who can think three steps ahead come out triumphant.
When it comes to their favorite surfaces, both players seem to have a deep affection for the crack of ball on Hard court. Ilkel, with a success rate of 62%, seems to be an aficionado, whereas Poljak isn't too far behind with a solid 60%. However, put Ilkel on grass, and you've got a cat on a hot tin roof, winning just 10% of his matches. Similarly, Poljak seems to regard Clay courts with an indifferent shrug, clinching a mere 49%.
Speaking of breaking points, Poljak seems to have nerves of steel, saving 57.68% of breakpoints he faces, compared to Ilkel's 50%. But when it comes to converting opportunities, Ilkel turns a bit more of these into gold, converting 37.37% of his opportunities, whereas Poljak sips his lemonade at 34.51%. Together, they make a gripping story for anyone interested in in-game theatrics and live betting excitement!
Now, let's talk about pressure. In past encounters between the two, Ilkel has emerged victorious every time they've played—which, admittedly, is just once, but who's counting? Oh, right, we are! With an average match time of 1 hour and 31 minutes, it seems fans prefer not to blink for fear of missing an epic rally.
And when we march headfirst into deciding sets, Ilkel seems to get along better with his nerve-wrecking frenemy, winning 60% of those nail-biters compared to Poljak's 47%. So, if we look into our tennis crystal ball, Ilkel might just have the stats on his side to claim the grand prize in their next showdown. But will this be a match for the ages or a cautionary tale for statisticians? Stay tuned, as tennis will serve up its answer, one set at a time!
Ilkel vs Poljak Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
61 of
95)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
65)
82
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evgeny Karlovskiy
Player
Cem Ilkel
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Cem Ilkel
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
9
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
87%
(
40 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Evgenii Tiurnev
67%
(
56 of
83)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
2
Aces
12
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
30 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
23 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
71
|
2-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Michal Krajci
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
11
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Kanan Gasimov
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Cem Ilkel
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
76%
(
62 of
82)
11
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
24 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Matteo Lavizzari
58%
(
57 of
98)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
99)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
6
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
47 of
59)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
34 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
David Poljak Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Evgenii Tiurnev
Player
David Poljak
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
54%
(
49 of
91)
10
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
18 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
71
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Tom Zeuch
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
72%
(
44 of
61)
4
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
18 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Kirill Kalennik
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
German Mingaleev
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
David Poljak
61%
(
62 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
68 of
110)
9
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
47 of
68)
64%
(
25 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
30%
(
30 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
41 of
110)
112
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(3) 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Gabriele Volpi
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
56 of
82)
8
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
26 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
6-7(2) 6-4 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Samuel Stolarik
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve %
45%
(
15 of
33)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
88%
(
14 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
49
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (437/336) | Win/Loss | 55% (342/278) |
| 55% (976/811) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (779/662) |
| 52% (8762/8241) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (7129/6622) |
| 61% (287/180) | Hard Win/Loss | 60% (114/76) |
| 45% (57/71) | Clay Win/Loss | 49% (109/112) |
| 55% (92/76) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (118/89) |
| 10% (1/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) |
| 0.34 | Aces Per Game | 0.39 |
| 2848 | Aces Total | 2623 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 1384 | Total Double Faults | 1614 |
| 1:15:3 | Average Match Time | 1:23:10 |
| 534.03 | Average Opponent Rank | 511.36 |
| 58% (24043/41154) | 1st Serve % | 60% (22196/37198) |
| 70% (16913/24043) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (15566/22196) |
| 51% (8730/17111) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (7286/15001) |
| 40% (1618/4009) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1510/3470) |
| 39% (16189/41630) | Return Points Win % | 39% (14280/36400) |
| 32% (7/15) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (2/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 32% (7/15) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 18% (5/23) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (175/160) | Challenger W/L | 39% (44/69) |
| 66% (241/122) | Futures W/L | 59% (298/209) |
| 56% (425/754) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (337/614) |
| 40% (4/10) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 53% (146/273) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (98/191) |
| 56% (130/232) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (105/206) |
| 85% (423/361) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (339/283) |
| 14% (423/60) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (339/56) |
| 21% (349/74) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (281/57) |
Ilkel vs. Poljak Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
