Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Cem Ilkel vs Billy Harris Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ilkel vs Harris analysis and find out who is favored!
Cem Ilkel vs Billy Harris Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ilkel has won 47.74% of points on his second serve, while Harris has won 49.57%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ilkel, in recent form, has won 51.79% of his opponent's second serve points, while Harris has won 50.66%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.31% and 27.79% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ilkel has saved 53.85% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Harris has saved 62.16% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ilkel has won 39.58% of matches played (W/L 19/ 29), with Harris winning 62.5% (W/L 55/ 33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 254/ 162), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9). Harris has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 150/ 84), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 45/ 32).
- Player level: In the last year, Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 37.5% of matches (W/L 12/ 20), where as Harris has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.87% of matches (W/L 42/ 27). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Ilkel winning 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Ilkel winning 0 and Harris winning 4. The last match between Ilkel and Harris was at the Hamburg Challenger, 19-10-2023, Second, I.hard with Billy Harris getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:46:49.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ilkel and Harris have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ilkel winning 0 times and Harris 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Ilkel winning 0, and Harris 2.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ilkel has played against opponents with an average rank of 236.83 while Harris has played against players with an average rank of 238.69.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ilkel has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Harris has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ilkel has converted 44.76% of breakpoint opportunities, and Harris has converted 37.5% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ilkel 0 - 2 Harris
418
Rank
144
High
28
Age
R
Plays
0
Total2
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
207
Rank
181
High
29
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
56% (400-309)
Career Total W/L
62% (361-220)
44% (8-10)
YTD W/L
46% (11-13)
$225,530
Career Prize Money
$83,655
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Cem Ilkel | Billy Harris |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 4 |
| Games Won | 17 | 26 |
| Aces (Total) | 12 | 11 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:49 | 1:46:49 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (75/138) | 60% (81/135) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (47/75) | 74% (60/81) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (28/63) | 50% (27/54) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 62% (8/13) |
| Return Points W% | 36% (48/135) | 46% (63/138) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 6-1 |
Stats 
Billy Harris
Player
Cem Ilkel
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
7
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
| 7-6(8) 6-4 |
Stats
Billy Harris
Player
Cem Ilkel
55%
(
40 of
73)
1st Serve %
52%
(
36 of
69)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
44%
(
32 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Cem Ilkel | Billy Harris |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 44% (8/10) | 46% (11/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 43% (17/23) | 46% (26/30) |
| Games Win/Loss | 46% (165/195) | 50% (273/278) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 43% (3/4) | 50% (3/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 45% (5/6) | 45% (5/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.54 | 0.38 |
| Aces Total | 94 | 102 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.21 |
| DFs Total | 42 | 57 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:28:14 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 162.39 | 248.67 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (616/1073) | 64% (1136/1788) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (442/616) | 70% (799/1136) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (210/457) | 48% (314/652) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (32/74) | 40% (57/144) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (378/1044) | 36% (637/1777) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (7/7) | 45% (10/12) |
| Futures W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 41% (7/17) | 41% (9/22) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 40% (4/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 40% (4/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (8/6) | 57% (14/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (8/2) | 43% (14/6) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 30% (10/3) |
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Petr Nesterov
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Yousef Khamis
47%
(
34 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
9
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
5
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Agwi
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
11
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
100%
(
21 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Johan Nikles
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Illya Marchenko
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(6) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Kyle Edmund
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
98)
12
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
13
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Cem Ilkel
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
6
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Billy Harris Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Billy Harris
Player
Adrian Andreev
67%
(
68 of
102)
1st Serve %
73%
(
77 of
106)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
51 of
77)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
42 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
106)
104
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Billy Harris
54%
(
50 of
93)
1st Serve %
53%
(
45 of
85)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
39 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
91
Total Points Won
87
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Billy Harris
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Billy Harris
73%
(
63 of
86)
1st Serve %
52%
(
36 of
69)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Billy Harris
Player
Gabriel Debru
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve %
62%
(
13 of
21)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
9 of
12)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
26
Total Points Won
11
|
6-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Billy Harris
Player
Tristan Mccormick
41%
(
17 of
41)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
88%
(
15 of
17)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
10 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Billy Harris
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
72%
(
53 of
74)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicola Kuhn
Player
Billy Harris
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
69%
(
51 of
74)
10
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
0
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
39 of
51)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
14 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
25 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Billy Harris
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
56%
(
43 of
77)
4
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
2-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Billy Harris
Player
Mattia Bellucci
65%
(
69 of
106)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
5
Aces
24
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
53 of
69)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
47 of
63)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
33 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
32 of
99)
105
Total Points Won
100
|
6-7(7) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Ilkel Vs Harris Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Cem Ilkel
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Billy Harris
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
