Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Matchstat.com expert prediction for the Ilkel Hoang H2H. Here is our in-depth stats analysis and accurate prediction of the Ilkel Hoang head to head.
Full Stats Used To Calculate Our Ilkel Vs Hoang Prediction Are Further Down This Page. Here Is A Brief Snapshot
The best career year for Ilkel was 2017 when he won 63% of matches played on all surfaces (57/34). Hoang was in the best form in 2017 when he had victories of 68% of his matches (51/24). In their last event played, Hoang made the First round at M25+H Mulhouse, whereas Ilkel played Yokkaichi Challenger and made the First round.
255
Rank
144
High
28
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
529
Rank
98
High
28
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
57% (392-299)
Career Total W/L
58% (364-265)
53% (33-29)
YTD W/L
50% (27-27)
$225,530
Career Prize Money
$522,575
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Cem Ilkel | Antoine Hoang |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 9 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:51 | 1:47:51 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (36/64) | 68% (52/77) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 64% (23/36) | 75% (39/52) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 43% (12/28) | 36% (9/25) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 22% (2/9) | 80% (4/5) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (29/77) | 45% (29/64) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Form Is Very Important In Predicting An Upcoming H2H. Recent Matches With Stats…
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-5 |
Stats 
Antoine Hoang
Player
Cem Ilkel
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Cem Ilkel | Antoine Hoang |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 53% (33/29) | 50% (27/27) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (71/71) | 53% (68/60) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (686/677) | 51% (651/620) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 38% (6/10) | 25% (2/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/4) | 44% (4/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 66% (27/14) | 57% (21/16) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.41 | 0.29 |
| Aces Total | 277 | 179 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.32 |
| DFs Total | 149 | 202 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:7 | 1:57:58 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 304.27 | 211.65 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (2439/4237) | 69% (2708/3925) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (1756/2439) | 71% (1914/2708) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (918/1798) | 50% (608/1217) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (153/364) | 41% (138/333) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (1615/4300) | 37% (1493/4012) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 54% (26/22) | 39% (7/11) |
| Futures W/L | 80% (4/1) | 56% (20/16) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (33/62) | 50% (26/52) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (11/22) | 41% (9/22) |
| Deciding Set W% | 72% (13/18) | 30% (6/20) |
| 1st set W, W | 93% (28/26) | 75% (28/21) |
| 1st set W, L | 7% (28/2) | 25% (28/7) |
| 1st set L, W | 21% (34/7) | 23% (26/6) |
Cem Ilkel Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Moez Echargui
Player
Cem Ilkel
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
54%
(
49 of
90)
1
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
1
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Cem Ilkel
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
55%
(
22 of
40)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
9 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
52
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Cem Ilkel
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Max Purcell
62%
(
58 of
93)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
11
Aces
12
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
37 of
46)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
29 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
22 of
74)
86
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Dimitar Kuzmanov
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
69%
(
48 of
70)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Cem Ilkel
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
8
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Illya Marchenko
48%
(
48 of
99)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
101)
5
Aces
18
3
Double Faults
4
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
49 of
62)
65%
(
33 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
30 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
33 of
101)
102
Total Points Won
98
|
6-7(3) 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Billy Harris
Player
Cem Ilkel
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
7
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Henri Laaksonen
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve %
45%
(
18 of
40)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
9 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
44
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gabi Adrian Boitan
Player
Cem Ilkel
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Antoine Hoang Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
Player
Antoine Hoang
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
18 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matej Dodig
Player
Antoine Hoang
62%
(
13 of
21)
1st Serve %
63%
(
15 of
24)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
92%
(
12 of
13)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
5 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
28
Total Points Won
17
|
6-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Hoang
Player
Leo Deflandre
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tom Paris
Player
Antoine Hoang
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
8
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
5
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
18 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
22 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Antoine Hoang
Player
Sandro Cottino
86%
(
42 of
49)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
9
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Hoang
Player
Simon Reveniau
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Antoine Hoang
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
96)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lucas Poullain
Player
Antoine Hoang
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Antoine Hoang
Player
Cem Ilkel
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Antoine Hoang
57%
(
66 of
115)
1st Serve %
72%
(
81 of
113)
20
Aces
13
4
Double Faults
5
86%
(
57 of
66)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
60 of
81)
47%
(
23 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
35 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
36 of
113)
116
Total Points Won
112
|
6-3 6-7(3) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Ilkel Vs Hoang Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
