Celine Naef vs Weronika Ewald Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W W L W W W L
Form
W W W L L W L W W LHead-To-Head: Naef 1 - 0 Ewald
They have played 2 sets in total, with Naef winning 2 and Ewald winning 0. The last match between Naef and Ewald was at the W75 Leszno, 06-02-2025, Second, I.hard with Celine Naef getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Celine Naef | 1 |
| Weronika Ewald | 0 |
W75 Leszno(06-02-2025)
6
3
6
2
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Schoolkate VS Aliassime PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
21 Mar 2025 / Second
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Goffin VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
21 Mar 2025 / Second
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Celine Naef
Player
Weronika Ewald
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
0
12
Games Won
5
7
Aces (Total)
0
4
Total Double Faults
3
1:10:26
Average Match Time
1:10:26
59% (37/63)
1st Serve %
53% (24/45)
68% (25/37)
1st Serve Win %
50% (12/24)
58% (15/26)
2nd Serve Win %
52% (11/21)
67% (4/6)
Break Points Won % (Total)
25% (1/4)
49% (22/45)
Return Points Win %
37% (23/63)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Celine Naef Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Celine Naef
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
48%
(
28 of
58)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Ella Seidel
57%
(
60 of
106)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
12
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
0
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
48%
(
22 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
41 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
98
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Alexandra Eala
58%
(
54 of
93)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
77)
11
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
33 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
92
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Tamara Korpatsch
63%
(
63 of
100)
1st Serve %
65%
(
58 of
89)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
35 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
101
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Celine Naef
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
74%
(
35 of
47)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Linda Klimovicova
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
78
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Lian Tran
51%
(
20 of
39)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Weronika Ewald
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Marina Bassols Ribera
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
43 of
77)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Weronika Ewald Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Francesca Pace
Player
Weronika Ewald
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Weronika Ewald
Player
Sandugash Kenzhibayeva
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
3
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
5
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Weronika Ewald
Player
Smriti Bhasin
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
80%
(
41 of
51)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maria Golovina
Player
Weronika Ewald
53%
(
38 of
72)
1st Serve %
74%
(
52 of
70)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
9
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 4-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Weronika Ewald
Player
Kashish Bhatia
53%
(
16 of
30)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
9 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
52
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anjali Rathi
Player
Weronika Ewald
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
49%
(
23 of
47)
3
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
5
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
16%
(
3 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
51%
(
24 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
52
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Weronika Ewald
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Weronika Ewald
Player
Ania Hertel
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Weronika Ewald
Player
Barbara Straszewska
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Weronika Ewald
Player
Nika Hurkacz
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
8
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
66% (116/61)
Win/Loss
59% (48/34)
62% (256/157)
Sets Win/Loss
57% (106/79)
55% (2092/1695)
Games Win/Loss
54% (912/779)
62% (16/10)
Hard Win/Loss
62% (32/20)
56% (23/18)
Clay Win/Loss
52% (12/11)
72% (71/27)
Indoor Hard W/L
57% (4/3)
50% (6/6)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.28
Aces Per Game
0.15
518
Aces Total
126
0.2
Double Faults Per Game
0.56
375
Total Double Faults
465
1:35:46
Average Match Time
1:38:9
303.78
Average Opponent Rank
431.84
60% (7288/12070)
1st Serve %
59% (3075/5187)
64% (4690/7288)
1st Serve Win %
62% (1912/3075)
49% (2337/4782)
2nd Serve Win %
43% (918/2112)
50% (773/1542)
Break Points Won % (Total)
51% (369/721)
46% (5635/12153)
Return Points Win %
49% (2563/5270)
43% (6/8)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/4)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
38% (3/5)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/2)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
70% (94/41)
Challenger W/L
49% (17/18)
87% (13/2)
Futures W/L
69% (31/14)
66% (116/177)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
58% (47/81)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
59% (20/34)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
38% (5/13)
59% (35/59)
Deciding Set Win %
50% (11/22)
87% (108/94)
1st Set Won, Won Match
89% (47/42)
13% (108/14)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
11% (47/5)
32% (69/22)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
17% (35/6)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
