Celine Naef vs Tamara Korpatsch Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L W W L W L L
Form
W L L W W W W W W WH2H: Naef 1 - 0 Korpatsch
They have played 3 sets in total, with Naef winning 2 and Korpatsch winning 1. The last match between Naef and Korpatsch was at the W75 Trnava, 26-02-2025, Round: First, Surface: I.hard, with Celine Naef getting the victory 4-6 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Celine Naef | 1 |
| Tamara Korpatsch | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W75 Trnava(26-02-2025)
Celine Naef
Tamara Korpatsch
4
6
6
3
6
2
| Naef | Stats | Korpatsch |
|---|---|---|
| 53% (10-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 67% (20-10) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 191 | Ranking | 148 |
| 121 | Highest Rank | 71 |
| 19 | Age | 30 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 7 | Titles | 14 |
| 64% (119-66) | Career Total W/L | 56% (380-295) |
| $220,512 | Career Prize Money | $934,170 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Krejcikova VS Maria PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sinner VS Rinderknech PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris atp
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Celine Naef
Player
Tamara Korpatsch
63%
(
63 of
100)
1st Serve %
65%
(
58 of
89)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
35 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
101
Total Points Won
88
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 11 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:15:53 | Average Match Time | 2:15:53 |
| 63% (63/100) | 1st Serve % | 65% (58/89) |
| 68% (43/63) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (38/58) |
| 59% (22/37) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (15/31) |
| 27% (3/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 17% (1/6) |
| 40% (36/89) | Return Points Win % | 35% (35/100) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Naef vs Korpatsch Match Preview :
In predicting the outcome of this upcoming tennis match, we begin by analyzing the second serve performance over the last six months. Naef has secured 52.57% of points on her second serve, whereas Korpatsch achieved a lower percentage of 44.24%. This statistic is notably correlated with accurate match predictions, indicating the importance of strong second serve performance.
Examining return game statistics, Naef holds an advantage in returning her opponent's second serve, winning 57.68% of these points, compared to Korpatsch's 56.12%. When it comes to first serve return points, Naef again leads with 41.25% compared to Korpatsch's 39.41%. These return stats are significant for determining who may be favored in this head-to-head matchup.
Under pressure, Naef has shown resilience by saving 56.22% of breakpoints, surpassing Korpatsch's 48.06%. Breakpoint management is a critical element for in-game betting predictions as it reflects a player's composure in crucial game situations.
Their overall performance over the past year presents Naef with a superior win rate of 57.14% (W/L 36/27), while Korpatsch lags behind at 36.36% (W/L 20/35). This provides a broader perspective on who might excel in this encounter. When considering surface proficiency, Naef's most successful surface has been indoor hard courts with a career win rate of 73%. Conversely, Korpatsch shines on clay with a 65% success rate, hinting at their strategic strengths.
Regarding player exposure, both athletes have been active predominantly in Challengers/ITF tournaments over $10K, with Naef securing a 64.15% win rate (W/L 34/19) and Korpatsch achieving 57.14% (W/L 12/9). The level of competition faced, however, differs; Naef has competed against players with an average rank of 218.76, whereas Korpatsch's opponents had an average rank of 145.2, emphasizing the variability in competition level.
When the match extends into deciding sets, Naef's statistics show that she has consistently won 50% over the past year, slightly outperforming Korpatsch who stands at 39%. This fact could influence the match's outcome significantly if tightly contested.
Breakpoint conversion is yet another critical factor, with Naef converting 54.04% of opportunities recently compared to Korpatsch’s 50.21%. This is crucial for live betting predictions, as converting breakpoints can drastically shift match momentum.
Based on these statistical insights, Naef appears to have the upper hand overall. Her superior stats in serving, breakpoint saving, and conversion suggest she is more likely to emerge victorious in this encounter.
Naef vs Korpatsch Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Celine Naef Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Joanna Garland
Player
Celine Naef
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kaja Juvan
Player
Celine Naef
43%
(
35 of
82)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
84)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
49%
(
23 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
36 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
42 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
2-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Sara Cakarevic
42%
(
40 of
95)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
95)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
62%
(
34 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
30 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
34 of
95)
99
Total Points Won
91
|
6-3 6-7(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alice Rame
Player
Celine Naef
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
45%
(
37 of
83)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
9
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
15 of
46)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Stefanie Voegele
45%
(
18 of
40)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Marta Kostyuk
50%
(
47 of
94)
1st Serve %
132%
(
70 of
53)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
53%
(
25 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Celine Naef
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve %
51%
(
42 of
83)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Xinyu Gao
Player
Celine Naef
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
52
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Tamara Korpatsch Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Tamara Korpatsch
Player
Rebeka Masarova
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
43%
(
40 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
88
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Tamara Korpatsch
Player
Marina Stakusic
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tamara Korpatsch
Player
Louisa Chirico
63%
(
64 of
102)
1st Serve %
67%
(
57 of
85)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
48%
(
31 of
64)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
63%
(
24 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
6 of
28)
89%
(
8 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
46%
(
47 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
47 of
85)
102
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Tamara Korpatsch
Player
Mai Hontama
67%
(
58 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
76)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
49%
(
43 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
84
|
1-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tamara Korpatsch
Player
Carole Monnet
62%
(
58 of
93)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
0
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
1
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
48%
(
45 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tamara Korpatsch
Player
Han Shi
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
44%
(
18 of
41)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamara Korpatsch
Player
Radka Zelnickova
49%
(
19 of
39)
1st Serve %
73%
(
40 of
55)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
58%
(
11 of
19)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
14 of
40)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
14 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64% (119/66) | Win/Loss | 56% (380/295) |
| 61% (264/168) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (853/710) |
| 55% (2174/1788) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (7363/6874) |
| 62% (16/10) | Hard Win/Loss | 33% (20/40) |
| 53% (26/23) | Clay Win/Loss | 65% (253/134) |
| 72% (71/27) | Indoor Hard W/L | 49% (96/99) |
| 50% (6/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 33% (11/22) |
| 0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
| 538 | Aces Total | 628 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.34 |
| 413 | Total Double Faults | 2389 |
| 1:36:12 | Average Match Time | 1:18:53 |
| 306.85 | Average Opponent Rank | 429.66 |
| 60% (7581/12665) | 1st Serve % | 60% (21359/35803) |
| 64% (4877/7581) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (12733/21359) |
| 49% (2484/5084) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (6245/14444) |
| 50% (798/1597) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (2319/4705) |
| 46% (5858/12709) | Return Points Win % | 48% (16679/35015) |
| 40% (6/9) | Slam W/L | 47% (22/25) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 21% (3/11) |
| 20% (1/4) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 38% (3/5) | Main Tour W/L | 45% (72/87) |
| 68% (96/45) | Challenger W/L | 62% (237/147) |
| 87% (13/2) | Futures W/L | 65% (46/25) |
| 64% (119/185) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (375/669) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 57% (21/37) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (72/147) |
| 58% (36/62) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (121/218) |
| 87% (112/97) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (353/311) |
| 13% (112/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (353/42) |
| 30% (73/22) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (322/68) |
Naef vs. Korpatsch Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
