Celine Naef vs Marta Kostyuk Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L W W L W L L
Form
W L W W W L W W W LH2H: Naef 1 - 0 Kostyuk
They have played 2 sets in total, with Naef winning 2 and Kostyuk winning 0. The last match between Naef and Kostyuk was at the Billie Jean King Cup, Qualifiers, Group E, 12-04-2025, Round: Rubber 1, Surface: Clay, with Celine Naef getting the victory 6-4 7-6(1).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Celine Naef | 1 |
| Marta Kostyuk | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Billie Jean King Cup, Qualifiers, Group E(12-04-2025)
Celine Naef
Marta Kostyuk
6
4
7
6
| Naef | Stats | Kostyuk |
|---|---|---|
| 53% (10-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 61% (17-11) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 191 | Ranking | 26 |
| 121 | Highest Rank | 16 |
| 19 | Age | 22 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 7 | Titles | 4 |
| 64% (119-66) | Career Total W/L | 63% (235-139) |
| $220,512 | Career Prize Money | $4,301,938 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Andreeva VS Bucsa PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Krejcikova VS Maria PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-6(1) |
Stats 
Celine Naef
Player
Marta Kostyuk
50%
(
47 of
94)
1st Serve %
132%
(
70 of
53)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
53%
(
25 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 10 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 2:1:0 | Average Match Time | 2:1:0 |
| 50% (47/94) | 1st Serve % | 132% (70/53) |
| 66% (31/47) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (32/46) |
| 53% (25/47) | 2nd Serve Win % | 28% (8/29) |
| 50% (4/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 20% (3/15) |
| 47% (35/75) | Return Points Win % | 40% (38/94) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Celine Naef Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Joanna Garland
Player
Celine Naef
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kaja Juvan
Player
Celine Naef
43%
(
35 of
82)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
84)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
49%
(
23 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
36 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
42 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
2-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Sara Cakarevic
42%
(
40 of
95)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
95)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
62%
(
34 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
30 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
34 of
95)
99
Total Points Won
91
|
6-3 6-7(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alice Rame
Player
Celine Naef
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
45%
(
37 of
83)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
9
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
15 of
46)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Stefanie Voegele
45%
(
18 of
40)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Marta Kostyuk
50%
(
47 of
94)
1st Serve %
132%
(
70 of
53)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
53%
(
25 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Celine Naef
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve %
51%
(
42 of
83)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Xinyu Gao
Player
Celine Naef
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
52
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Marta Kostyuk Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R4 |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Marta Kostyuk
56%
(
51 of
91)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
94
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Marta Kostyuk
Player
Leylah Annie Fernandez
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
5
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marta Kostyuk
Player
Daria Kasatkina
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
30 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marta Kostyuk
Player
Alexandra Eala
45%
(
13 of
29)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
85%
(
11 of
13)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Marta Kostyuk
68%
(
77 of
114)
1st Serve %
51%
(
52 of
102)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
42%
(
48 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
44 of
102)
110
Total Points Won
106
|
7-6(4) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Marta Kostyuk
Player
Anastasia Potapova
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Marta Kostyuk
Player
Veronika Kudermetova
51%
(
41 of
81)
1st Serve %
54%
(
61 of
112)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
8
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
55 of
112)
103
Total Points Won
90
|
6-0 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marta Kostyuk
Player
Emma Raducanu
51%
(
39 of
77)
1st Serve %
63%
(
58 of
92)
1
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
4
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
84
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64% (119/66) | Win/Loss | 63% (235/139) |
| 61% (264/168) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (519/356) |
| 55% (2174/1788) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (4392/3743) |
| 62% (16/10) | Hard Win/Loss | 63% (125/74) |
| 53% (26/23) | Clay Win/Loss | 66% (79/40) |
| 72% (71/27) | Indoor Hard W/L | 63% (15/9) |
| 50% (6/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (16/16) |
| 0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
| 538 | Aces Total | 1028 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.5 |
| 413 | Total Double Faults | 1998 |
| 1:36:12 | Average Match Time | 1:35:42 |
| 306.85 | Average Opponent Rank | 263.8 |
| 60% (7581/12665) | 1st Serve % | 60% (16025/26755) |
| 64% (4877/7581) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (10299/15958) |
| 49% (2484/5084) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (4731/10798) |
| 50% (798/1597) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1633/3387) |
| 46% (5858/12709) | Return Points Win % | 46% (12196/26304) |
| 40% (6/9) | Slam W/L | 60% (39/26) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 56% (46/36) |
| 20% (1/4) | Cups W/L | 73% (8/3) |
| 38% (3/5) | Main Tour W/L | 61% (76/49) |
| 68% (96/45) | Challenger W/L | 73% (58/22) |
| 87% (13/2) | Futures W/L | 73% (8/3) |
| 64% (119/185) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (234/371) |
| 57% (21/37) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (49/88) |
| 58% (36/62) | Deciding Set Win % | 62% (80/130) |
| 87% (112/97) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (223/196) |
| 13% (112/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (223/27) |
| 30% (73/22) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (151/39) |
Naef vs. Kostyuk Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
