C. Naef
To Win
A. Friedsam
To Win
Celine Naef vs Mariam Bolkvadze Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W W W L W W L
Form
L W W L W L W L W LHead-To-Head: Naef 1 - 0 Bolkvadze
They have played 2 sets in total, with Naef winning 2 and Bolkvadze winning 0. The last match between Naef and Bolkvadze was at the Wimbledon - London, 25-06-2025, Round: Q2 round, Surface: Grass, with Celine Naef getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Celine Naef | 1 |
| Mariam Bolkvadze | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Wimbledon - London(25-06-2025)
Celine Naef
Mariam Bolkvadze
6
1
6
1
| Naef | Stats | Bolkvadze |
|---|---|---|
| 59% (17-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 59% (23-16) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 178 | Ranking | 198 |
| 121 | Highest Rank | 151 |
| 20 | Age | 27 |
| - | Plays | L |
| 7 | Titles | 8 |
| 65% (126-69) | Career Total W/L | 60% (349-232) |
| $220,512 | Career Prize Money | $341,858 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
14 Jul 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Gaston VS Tseng PREDICTION Clay
Nordea Open - Bastad atp
13 Jul 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Walton VS Mendez PREDICTION Hard
Mifel Tennis Open - Los Cabos atp
15 Jul 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats 
Celine Naef
Player
Mariam Bolkvadze
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve %
73%
(
33 of
45)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 2 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 0:52:0 | Average Match Time | 0:52:0 |
| 58% (21/36) | 1st Serve % | 73% (33/45) |
| 86% (18/21) | 1st Serve Win % | 42% (14/33) |
| 67% (10/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (4/12) |
| 83% (5/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 60% (27/45) | Return Points Win % | 22% (8/36) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Naef vs Bolkvadze Match Preview :
- How does the second serve performance compare? Bolkvadze has recently won 39.1% of second serve points, while Naef has a slight edge with 41.76%, which often influences match predictions.
- In terms of returning skills, Bolkvadze shines. They have won 52.6% of their opponent's second serve points compared to Naef's 45.39%. For first serve returns, Bolkvadze also leads with 34.12% over Naef's 29.53%.
- Under pressure, Naef has saved 52.24% of breakpoints, slightly better than Bolkvadze's 49.53%. Could this influence in-game decisions?
- Analyzing the past year, Bolkvadze has a win rate of 59.7%, while Naef performs stronger with a 63.79% rate.
- Both players struggle on clay, each with a career win rate of 53%. Bolkvadze excels on Hard surfaces with a 63% winning streak, whereas Naef is dominant on I.hard, boasting a 73% success rate.
- Examining recent competitions in Challengers/ITF, Bolkvadze wins 62.5% of matches, closely following Naef’s 66.67% success.
- Considering opponent quality over the previous year, Bolkvadze faced players with an average ranking of 278.67, while Naef played against stronger opponents with an average ranking of 234.43.
- In deciding-set battles, Naef holds a 68% victory rate, surpassing Bolkvadze’s 62% in clutch situations.
- Looking at break point conversion, Bolkvadze leads with 44.71% over Naef’s 37.5%, an important factor during critical match moments.
Editorial Prediction (June 25, 2025, UTC):
Both players display distinctive strengths, yet the stats reveal notable differences. Bolkvadze excels in returning games, significantly outperforming Naef in capturing both their opponent's second and first serves. This ability to return effectively may prove pivotal.
Conversely, Naef exhibits a stronger overall performance this past year with a higher win percentage, stronger performance under pressure with better breakpoint saves, and tackling opponents with a higher average ranking.
Despite Bolkvadze's edge in break point conversions and return games, Naef's consistency in winning matches and excelling in deciding sets give them a slightly favorable position. Given these insights, Naef is poised as the most likely winner in this upcoming match.
Naef vs Bolkvadze Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Celine Naef Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Taylor Townsend
Player
Celine Naef
81%
(
48 of
59)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Mariam Bolkvadze
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve %
73%
(
33 of
45)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Chloe Paquet
61%
(
60 of
98)
1st Serve %
45%
(
47 of
104)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
11
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
41 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
104)
102
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Rebecca Marino
Player
Celine Naef
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
58 of
100)
7
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
10
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
19%
(
4 of
21)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
16 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
100)
92
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Amarni Banks
49%
(
49 of
100)
1st Serve %
69%
(
70 of
102)
6
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
8
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
42 of
70)
41%
(
21 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
44%
(
44 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
102)
104
Total Points Won
98
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Antonia Ruzic
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
60%
(
54 of
90)
8
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
100%
(
8 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
90)
96
Total Points Won
75
|
6-7(5) 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Kyoka Okamura
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Kayla Cross
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve %
55%
(
44 of
80)
3
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
8
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
29%
(
22 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
6-1 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Mariam Bolkvadze Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Caty McNally
Player
Mariam Bolkvadze
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariam Bolkvadze
Player
Ayana Akli
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
72%
(
48 of
67)
2
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
1
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Monika Ekstrand
Player
Mariam Bolkvadze
63%
(
64 of
101)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
101)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
14
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
32%
(
12 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
89%
(
8 of
9)
Break Points Won
80%
(
8 of
10)
50%
(
50 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
52 of
101)
103
Total Points Won
99
|
2-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariam Bolkvadze
Player
Fiona Crawley
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
2
Aces
1
18
Double Faults
3
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
44%
(
36 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Mariam Bolkvadze
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve %
73%
(
33 of
45)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mariam Bolkvadze
Player
Varvara Lepchenko
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve %
63%
(
48 of
76)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Alexandrova
Player
Mariam Bolkvadze
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
81%
(
47 of
58)
10
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
35%
(
11 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mariam Bolkvadze
Player
Dalma Galfi
75%
(
51 of
68)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65% (126/69) | Win/Loss | 60% (349/232) |
| 61% (280/178) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (781/535) |
| 55% (2308/1900) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (6431/5353) |
| 62% (16/10) | Hard Win/Loss | 63% (183/107) |
| 53% (26/23) | Clay Win/Loss | 53% (49/43) |
| 72% (71/27) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (100/66) |
| 59% (13/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 52% (17/16) |
| 0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 583 | Aces Total | 465 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.46 |
| 440 | Total Double Faults | 2644 |
| 1:36:38 | Average Match Time | 1:22:18 |
| 303.59 | Average Opponent Rank | 474.08 |
| 60% (8026/13437) | 1st Serve % | 66% (20484/31005) |
| 65% (5185/8026) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (12669/20484) |
| 49% (2641/5411) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (4562/10519) |
| 50% (842/1686) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (2151/4306) |
| 46% (6184/13471) | Return Points Win % | 48% (15082/31377) |
| 44% (8/10) | Slam W/L | 42% (10/14) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 20% (1/4) | Cups W/L | 10% (1/9) |
| 38% (3/5) | Main Tour W/L | 32% (7/15) |
| 68% (101/47) | Challenger W/L | 61% (221/141) |
| 87% (13/2) | Futures W/L | 68% (110/51) |
| 65% (126/195) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (346/567) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 55% (21/38) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (49/106) |
| 59% (40/68) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (81/166) |
| 87% (117/102) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (345/303) |
| 13% (117/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (345/40) |
| 31% (78/24) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (236/46) |
Naef vs. Bolkvadze Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
