C. Naef
To Win
J. Garland
To Win
Celine Naef vs Lian Tran Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L L W W L W L
Form
W W L W L W W L W LHead-To-Head: Naef 2 - 0 Tran
They have played 4 sets in total, with Naef winning 4 and Tran winning 0. The last match between Naef and Tran was at the W75 Prague, 19-02-2025, Round: First, Surface: I.hard, with Celine Naef getting the victory 6-2 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Celine Naef | 2 |
| Lian Tran | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W75 Prague(19-02-2025)
Celine Naef
Lian Tran
6
2
6
0
| Naef | Stats | Tran |
|---|---|---|
| 56% (10-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 57% (17-13) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 191 | Ranking | 352 |
| 121 | Highest Rank | 351 |
| 19 | Age | 22 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 7 | Titles | 1 |
| 65% (119-65) | Career Total W/L | 55% (169-140) |
| $220,512 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 2 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
19 May 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Gojo VS Lehecka PREDICTION Clay
Hamburg Open - Hamburg atp
19 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Costoulas VS Bartashevich PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
19 May 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-0 |
Stats 
Celine Naef
Player
Lian Tran
51%
(
20 of
39)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
27
|
||||
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Lian Tran
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
33
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 24 | Games Won | 5 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 0:53:55 | Average Match Time | 0:53:55 |
| 54% (43/80) | 1st Serve % | 67% (64/96) |
| 77% (33/43) | 1st Serve Win % | 44% (28/64) |
| 68% (25/37) | 2nd Serve Win % | 31% (10/32) |
| 55% (11/20) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 60% (58/96) | Return Points Win % | 28% (22/80) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Celine Naef Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Kaja Juvan
Player
Celine Naef
43%
(
35 of
82)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
84)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
49%
(
23 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
36 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
42 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
2-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Sara Cakarevic
42%
(
40 of
95)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
95)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
62%
(
34 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
30 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
34 of
95)
99
Total Points Won
91
|
6-3 6-7(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alice Rame
Player
Celine Naef
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
45%
(
37 of
83)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
9
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
15 of
46)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Stefanie Voegele
45%
(
18 of
40)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Marta Kostyuk
50%
(
47 of
94)
1st Serve %
132%
(
70 of
53)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
53%
(
25 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Celine Naef
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve %
51%
(
42 of
83)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Xinyu Gao
Player
Celine Naef
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
52
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Celine Naef
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
48%
(
28 of
58)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Lian Tran Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Camilla Rosatello
Player
Lian Tran
40%
(
17 of
42)
1st Serve %
73%
(
37 of
51)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
12 of
17)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lian Tran
Player
Kaitlin Quevedo
78%
(
54 of
69)
1st Serve %
74%
(
64 of
87)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
46 of
87)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lola Radivojevic
Player
Lian Tran
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lian Tran
Player
Kristina Novak
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
47%
(
29 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lian Tran
Player
Maja Brnic
52%
(
11 of
21)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
7
64%
(
7 of
11)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
38%
(
8 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
39
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Lian Tran
41%
(
30 of
73)
1st Serve %
76%
(
84 of
110)
7
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
43 of
84)
40%
(
17 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
24%
(
6 of
25)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
56 of
110)
100
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Yue Yuan
Player
Lian Tran
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65% (119/65) | Win/Loss | 55% (169/140) |
| 61% (264/166) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (378/330) |
| 55% (2165/1775) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (3290/3041) |
| 62% (16/10) | Hard Win/Loss | 52% (67/62) |
| 54% (26/22) | Clay Win/Loss | 55% (75/61) |
| 72% (71/27) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61% (27/17) |
| 50% (6/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 536 | Aces Total | 95 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 411 | Total Double Faults | 762 |
| 1:36:9 | Average Match Time | 1:25:38 |
| 307.56 | Average Opponent Rank | 467.21 |
| 60% (7541/12593) | 1st Serve % | 71% (12444/17576) |
| 64% (4853/7541) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (6827/12444) |
| 49% (2471/5052) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (2188/5130) |
| 50% (795/1592) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (1277/2516) |
| 46% (5833/12639) | Return Points Win % | 49% (8790/17781) |
| 43% (6/8) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 20% (1/4) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 38% (3/5) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 68% (96/45) | Challenger W/L | 58% (76/56) |
| 87% (13/2) | Futures W/L | 53% (92/83) |
| 65% (119/184) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (162/295) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 58% (21/36) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (24/48) |
| 58% (36/62) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (56/100) |
| 87% (112/97) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (161/136) |
| 13% (112/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (161/23) |
| 31% (72/22) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (148/33) |
Naef vs. Tran Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
