search

Celine Naef vs Elizabeth Mandlik Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Naef vs Mandlik analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Want To Bet On This Match?

After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:

* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here

If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com  Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.

Celine Naef vs Elizabeth Mandlik Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Naef 1 - 1 Mandlik

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Naef has won 47.97% of points on their second serve, while Mandlik has won 45.06%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Naef, in recent form, has won 54.83% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mandlik has won 53.36%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.36% and 39.6% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Naef has saved 56.36% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mandlik has saved 47.95% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Naef has won 48.15% of matches played (W/L 26/ 28), with Mandlik winning 48.08% (W/L 25/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Naef has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 43/ 17), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 6/ 6). Mandlik has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 85/ 56), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 14% (W/L 1/ 6).
  • Player level: In the last year, Naef has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.97% of matches (W/L 23/ 16), where as Mandlik has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 12/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Naef winning 1 times and Mandlik being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Naef winning 2 and Mandlik winning 3. The last match between Naef and Mandlik was at the Libema Open - 's-Hertogenbosch, 11-06-2024, First, Grass with Celine Naef getting the victory 7-6(4) 1-6 6-4.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:46:49.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Naef and Mandlik have played a deciding set 1 times, with Naef winning 1 times and Mandlik 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Naef winning 1, and Mandlik 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Naef has played against opponents with an average rank of 197.37 while Mandlik has played against players with an average rank of 200.33.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Naef has won 36% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mandlik has won 45% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Naef has converted 45.38% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mandlik has converted 49.03% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
bet365
Celine Naef

6

Total

0

Mast

4

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

2

Minor

170

Rank

121

High

19

Age

Plays

1

Total

1

0

Hard

0

0

Clay

1

0

Indoor

0

1

Grass

0

171

Rank

97

High

23

Age

Plays

Elizabeth Mandlik

7

Total

0

Mast

3

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

4

Minor

1

Total

1

0

Hard

0

0

Clay

1

0

Indoor

0

1

Grass

0

W L L L L L W L L L

Form

L L L W L W W L L L

65% (88-47)

Career Total W/L

56% (149-117)

50% (18-18)

YTD W/L

32% (6-13)

$173,282

Career Prize Money

$311,232

0

YTD Titles

0

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

The Best Odds For Celine Naef vs Elizabeth Mandlik For Any Market:

We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:

Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Naef VS Mandlik

Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!

Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting

Naef VS Mandlik H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

stats Celine Naef Elizabeth Mandlik
All H2H Matches 1 1
Sets Won 2 3
Games Won 22 29
Aces (Total) 10 4
DFs Total 4 6
Avg Match Time 1:46:49 1:46:49
1st Serve % 63% (104/165) 62% (100/161)
1st Serve Win% 63% (66/104) 67% (67/100)
2nd Serve Win% 44% (27/61) 57% (35/61)
BPs Won% (Total) 55% (6/11) 39% (9/23)
Return Points W% 37% (59/161) 44% (72/165)
Best of 3 Sets W% 50% (1/2) 50% (1/2)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
Deciding Set Win% 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
1st set W, W 100% (1/1) 100% (1/1)
1st set W, L 0% (1/0) 0% (1/0)
1st set L, W 0% (1/0) 0% (1/0)

Naef VS Mandlik H2h Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
7-6(4) 1-6 6-4
cross
Celine Naef
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
62% ( 69 of 111)
1st Serve %
58% ( 60 of 104)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
67% ( 46 of 69)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 40 of 60)
45% ( 19 of 42)
2nd Serve Won
55% ( 24 of 44)
43% ( 3 of 7)
Break Points Won
24% ( 4 of 17)
41% ( 46 of 111)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 40 of 104)
105
Total Points Won
110
7-5 6-3
cross
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Celine Naef
70% ( 40 of 57)
1st Serve %
65% ( 35 of 54)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
68% ( 27 of 40)
1st Serve Won
57% ( 20 of 35)
65% ( 11 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 8 of 19)
83% ( 5 of 6)
Break Points Won
75% ( 3 of 4)
33% ( 19 of 57)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 26 of 54)
64
Total Points Won
47

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Celine Naef Elizabeth Mandlik
YTD W/L 50% (18/18) 32% (6/13)
Sets Win/Loss 52% (43/39) 40% (19/28)
Games Win/Loss 52% (393/358) 48% (214/232)
Hard Win/Loss 60% (3/2) 0% (0/2)
Clay Win/Loss 43% (3/4) 30% (3/7)
Indoor Hard W/L 58% (11/8) 0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss 20% (1/4) 43% (3/4)
Aces pg 0.29 0.15
Aces Total 107 33
DFs per game 0.2 0.36
DFs Total 75 79
Avg Match Time 1:35:31 1:40:23
Avg Opp Rank 185.72 167.47
1st Serve % 60% (1470/2437) 59% (842/1428)
1st Serve W% 66% (963/1470) 61% (514/842)
2nd Serve W% 47% (452/967) 44% (258/586)
BPs Won% Total 44% (133/300) 49% (81/165)
Return Pts W% 44% (1080/2458) 44% (650/1476)
Slam W/L 25% (1/3) 0% (0/3)
Masters W/L 0% (0/0) 33% (1/2)
Cups W/L 0% (0/2) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 50% (1/1) 50% (3/3)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 57% (16/12) 29% (2/5)
Futures W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets W% 50% (18/36) 32% (6/19)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 67% (6/9) 25% (2/8)
Deciding Set W% 30% (3/10) 22% (2/9)
1st set W, W 89% (19/17) 80% (5/4)
1st set W, L 11% (19/2) 20% (5/1)
1st set L, W 6% (17/1) 14% (14/2)

Celine Naef Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
Q1
cross
Katarina Zavatska
Player
Celine Naef
81% ( 42 of 52)
1st Serve %
47% ( 24 of 51)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
67% ( 28 of 42)
1st Serve Won
58% ( 14 of 24)
90% ( 9 of 10)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 12 of 27)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
29% ( 15 of 52)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 25 of 51)
62
Total Points Won
41
L
6-2 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Alison Van Uytvanck
Player
Celine Naef
66% ( 45 of 68)
1st Serve %
59% ( 41 of 70)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
76% ( 34 of 45)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 26 of 41)
39% ( 9 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
28% ( 8 of 29)
56% ( 5 of 9)
Break Points Won
20% ( 1 of 5)
37% ( 25 of 68)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 36 of 70)
79
Total Points Won
59
L
7-5 6-1 H2H
R2
cross
Liudmila Samsonova
Player
Celine Naef
60% ( 34 of 57)
1st Serve %
59% ( 41 of 69)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
85% ( 29 of 34)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 26 of 41)
52% ( 12 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 11 of 28)
44% ( 4 of 9)
Break Points Won
14% ( 1 of 7)
28% ( 16 of 57)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 32 of 69)
73
Total Points Won
53
L
7-5 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Celine Naef
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
62% ( 69 of 111)
1st Serve %
58% ( 60 of 104)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
67% ( 46 of 69)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 40 of 60)
45% ( 19 of 42)
2nd Serve Won
55% ( 24 of 44)
43% ( 3 of 7)
Break Points Won
24% ( 4 of 17)
41% ( 46 of 111)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 40 of 104)
105
Total Points Won
110
W
7-6(4) 1-6 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Jule Niemeier
Player
Celine Naef
48% ( 22 of 46)
1st Serve %
57% ( 28 of 49)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
82% ( 18 of 22)
1st Serve Won
39% ( 11 of 28)
46% ( 11 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 8 of 21)
67% ( 6 of 9)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
37% ( 17 of 46)
Rtn Points Won
61% ( 30 of 49)
59
Total Points Won
36
L
6-3 6-1 H2H
Q1
cross
Darja Semenistaja
Player
Celine Naef
51% ( 27 of 53)
1st Serve %
63% ( 39 of 62)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
59% ( 16 of 27)
1st Serve Won
46% ( 18 of 39)
58% ( 15 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 10 of 23)
86% ( 6 of 7)
Break Points Won
75% ( 3 of 4)
42% ( 22 of 53)
Rtn Points Won
55% ( 34 of 62)
65
Total Points Won
50
L
6-2 7-5 H2H
R1
cross
Antonia Ruzic
Player
Celine Naef
63% ( 66 of 104)
1st Serve %
60% ( 58 of 96)
1
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
1
70% ( 46 of 66)
1st Serve Won
50% ( 29 of 58)
29% ( 11 of 38)
2nd Serve Won
47% ( 18 of 38)
62% ( 8 of 13)
Break Points Won
54% ( 7 of 13)
45% ( 47 of 104)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 49 of 96)
106
Total Points Won
94
L
6-4 4-6 7-5 H2H
R1
cross
Jenny Lim
Player
Celine Naef
65% ( 37 of 57)
1st Serve %
59% ( 24 of 41)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
68% ( 25 of 37)
1st Serve Won
50% ( 12 of 24)
45% ( 9 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 7 of 17)
83% ( 5 of 6)
Break Points Won
50% ( 2 of 4)
40% ( 23 of 57)
Rtn Points Won
54% ( 22 of 41)
56
Total Points Won
42
L
6-3 6-3 H2H
SF
cross
Chloe Paquet
Player
Celine Naef
54% ( 31 of 57)
1st Serve %
71% ( 48 of 68)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
71% ( 22 of 31)
1st Serve Won
54% ( 26 of 48)
42% ( 11 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
35% ( 7 of 20)
50% ( 6 of 12)
Break Points Won
60% ( 3 of 5)
42% ( 24 of 57)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 35 of 68)
68
Total Points Won
57
L
6-3 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Celine Naef
Player
Clara Burel
64% ( 36 of 56)
1st Serve %
53% ( 33 of 62)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
64% ( 23 of 36)
1st Serve Won
76% ( 25 of 33)
80% ( 16 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 11 of 29)
43% ( 3 of 7)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
30% ( 17 of 56)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 26 of 62)
65
Total Points Won
53
W
6-3 6-3 H2H

Elizabeth Mandlik Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
Q1
cross
Despina Papamichail
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
62% ( 79 of 128)
1st Serve %
45% ( 42 of 93)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
59% ( 47 of 79)
1st Serve Won
76% ( 32 of 42)
51% ( 25 of 49)
2nd Serve Won
53% ( 27 of 51)
100% ( 4 of 4)
Break Points Won
42% ( 5 of 12)
44% ( 56 of 128)
Rtn Points Won
37% ( 34 of 93)
106
Total Points Won
115
L
7-6(10) 2-6 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Taylah Preston
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
80% ( 89 of 111)
1st Serve %
77% ( 76 of 99)
1
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
3
63% ( 56 of 89)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 46 of 76)
55% ( 12 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
30% ( 7 of 23)
36% ( 5 of 14)
Break Points Won
33% ( 3 of 9)
39% ( 43 of 111)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 46 of 99)
114
Total Points Won
96
L
4-6 7-5 6-1 H2H
R1
cross
Celine Naef
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
62% ( 69 of 111)
1st Serve %
58% ( 60 of 104)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
67% ( 46 of 69)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 40 of 60)
45% ( 19 of 42)
2nd Serve Won
55% ( 24 of 44)
43% ( 3 of 7)
Break Points Won
24% ( 4 of 17)
41% ( 46 of 111)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 40 of 104)
105
Total Points Won
110
L
7-6(4) 1-6 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Zeynep Sonmez
50% ( 30 of 60)
1st Serve %
59% ( 26 of 44)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
60% ( 18 of 30)
1st Serve Won
50% ( 13 of 26)
60% ( 18 of 30)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 7 of 18)
71% ( 5 of 7)
Break Points Won
29% ( 2 of 7)
40% ( 24 of 60)
Rtn Points Won
55% ( 24 of 44)
60
Total Points Won
44
W
6-1 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Amanda Anisimova
66% ( 50 of 76)
1st Serve %
58% ( 53 of 92)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
62% ( 31 of 50)
1st Serve Won
58% ( 31 of 53)
50% ( 13 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 17 of 39)
43% ( 6 of 14)
Break Points Won
100% ( 4 of 4)
42% ( 32 of 76)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 44 of 92)
88
Total Points Won
80
W
3-6 6-3 6-2 H2H
R2
cross
Greetje Minnen
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
76% ( 28 of 37)
1st Serve %
62% ( 31 of 50)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
89% ( 25 of 28)
1st Serve Won
55% ( 17 of 31)
78% ( 7 of 9)
2nd Serve Won
37% ( 7 of 19)
40% ( 4 of 10)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
14% ( 5 of 37)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 26 of 50)
58
Total Points Won
29
L
6-2 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Daria Snigur
69% ( 58 of 84)
1st Serve %
71% ( 67 of 95)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
64% ( 37 of 58)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 41 of 67)
38% ( 10 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
32% ( 9 of 28)
63% ( 5 of 8)
Break Points Won
50% ( 5 of 10)
44% ( 37 of 84)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 45 of 95)
92
Total Points Won
87
W
7-6(4) 7-6(4) H2H
Q1
cross
Sinja Kraus
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
69% ( 75 of 108)
1st Serve %
65% ( 67 of 103)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
55% ( 41 of 75)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 41 of 67)
45% ( 15 of 33)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 14 of 36)
55% ( 6 of 11)
Break Points Won
58% ( 7 of 12)
48% ( 52 of 108)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 48 of 103)
104
Total Points Won
107
L
7-6(6) 3-6 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Anna Bondar
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
57% ( 49 of 86)
1st Serve %
56% ( 49 of 87)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
59% ( 29 of 49)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 31 of 49)
62% ( 23 of 37)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 17 of 38)
60% ( 6 of 10)
Break Points Won
44% ( 4 of 9)
40% ( 34 of 86)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 39 of 87)
91
Total Points Won
82
L
6-4 4-6 6-2 H2H
R2
cross
Emma Navarro
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
61% ( 35 of 57)
1st Serve %
54% ( 27 of 50)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
63% ( 22 of 35)
1st Serve Won
52% ( 14 of 27)
55% ( 12 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 10 of 23)
63% ( 5 of 8)
Break Points Won
29% ( 2 of 7)
40% ( 23 of 57)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 26 of 50)
60
Total Points Won
47
L
6-4 6-1 H2H

Naef Vs Mandlik Prediction H2H Images To Share

More tennis photos of Naef are available here and Mandlik photos here.


Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions