Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Celine Naef vs Andrea Lazaro Garcia Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Naef vs Garcia analysis and find out who is favored!
Celine Naef vs Andrea Lazaro Garcia Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Naef has won 47.32% of points on his second serve, while Garcia has won 46.57%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Naef, in recent form, has won 54.37% of his opponent's second serve points, while Garcia has won 59.06%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.39% and 45.84% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Naef has saved 57.01% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Garcia has saved 51.27% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Naef has won 56.67% of matches played (W/L 34/ 26), with Garcia winning 60.87% (W/L 28/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Naef has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 43/ 17), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 20/ 13). Garcia has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 73/ 37), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Naef has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 65.85% of matches (W/L 27/ 14), where as Garcia has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.5% of matches (W/L 23/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Naef winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Naef winning 2 and Garcia winning 1. The last match between Naef and Garcia was at the W25+H Cherbourg En Cotentin, 12-10-2022, First, I.hard with Celine Naef getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:40:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Naef and Garcia have played a deciding set 1 times, with Naef winning 1 times and Garcia 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Naef winning 0, and Garcia 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Naef has played against opponents with an average rank of 210.87 while Garcia has played against players with an average rank of 302.09.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Naef has won 46% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Garcia has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Naef has converted 42.91% of breakpoint opportunities, and Garcia has converted 55.02% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Naef 1 - 0 Garcia
158
Rank
121
High
18
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
429
Rank
180
High
29
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
68% (84-39)
Career Total W/L
60% (254-167)
58% (14-10)
YTD W/L
76% (16-5)
$169,770
Career Prize Money
$121,607
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Celine Naef | Andrea Lazaro Garcia |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:0 | 1:40:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (40/64) | 63% (46/73) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (29/40) | 50% (23/46) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (11/24) | 33% (9/27) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 70% (7/10) | 60% (3/5) |
| Return Points W% | 56% (41/73) | 38% (24/64) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 3-6 6-1 |
Stats 
Celine Naef
Player
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
41 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Celine Naef | Andrea Lazaro Garcia |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (14/10) | 76% (16/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 61% (34/22) | 70% (32/14) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (285/225) | 58% (237/170) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 76% (16/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 58% (11/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.35 | 0.04 |
| Aces Total | 87 | 7 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.42 |
| DFs Total | 51 | 82 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:4 | 1:44:22 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 168.75 | 262.52 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (1009/1669) | 61% (798/1303) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (693/1009) | 61% (487/798) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (313/660) | 48% (241/505) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (96/223) | 55% (111/201) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (769/1699) | 51% (690/1343) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 65% (13/7) | 69% (11/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (5/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (14/24) | 80% (16/20) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 100% (2/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 25% (2/8) | 100% (5/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 87% (15/13) | 100% (13/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (15/2) | 0% (13/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 38% (8/3) |
Celine Naef Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 3 |
Stats
Iga Swiatek
Player
Celine Naef
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Magdalena Frech
Player
Celine Naef
71%
(
77 of
109)
1st Serve %
62%
(
70 of
113)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
54 of
77)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
49 of
70)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
40 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
113)
116
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(8) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mona Barthel
Player
Celine Naef
66%
(
63 of
95)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
88)
12
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
72%
(
23 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
33 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
98
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Alison Van Uytvanck
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
24 of
37)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
52
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Joanna Garland
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
51%
(
33 of
65)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
14 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Celine Naef
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
64%
(
70 of
110)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
44 of
110)
104
Total Points Won
106
|
6-2 1-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Celine Naef
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Jana Fett
61%
(
56 of
92)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
94)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
39 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
94)
99
Total Points Won
87
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Himeno Sakatsume
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
86%
(
30 of
35)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Tereza Martincova
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Andrea Lazaro Garcia Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
Player
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve %
52%
(
12 of
23)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
9 of
15)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
80%
(
4 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
28
Total Points Won
15
|
6-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Miriam Bianca Bulgaru
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
66%
(
53 of
80)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
30 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
75
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Deborah Chiesa
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
46%
(
29 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Andreea Mitu
51%
(
33 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
8
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Francesca Jones
Player
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Sada Nahimana
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
82
Total Points Won
58
|
2-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Lucie Nguyen Tan
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
22 of
41)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
57
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marie Benoit
Player
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Ariana Geerlings
54%
(
56 of
103)
1st Serve %
58%
(
59 of
101)
0
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
11
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
36%
(
17 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
63%
(
10 of
16)
Break Points Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
55%
(
57 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
58 of
101)
104
Total Points Won
100
|
7-6(2) 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Carlota Martinez Cirez
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Naef Vs Garcia Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
