Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Cedric Stanke vs Maxime Pauwels Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Stanke vs Pauwels analysis and find out who is favored!
Cedric Stanke vs Maxime Pauwels Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Stanke has won 46.18% of points on his second serve, while Pauwels has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Stanke, in recent form, has won 51.19% of his opponent's second serve points, while Pauwels has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.96% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Stanke has saved 67.96% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pauwels has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Stanke has won 52.83% of matches played (W/L 28/ 25), with Pauwels winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Stanke has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 27/ 18), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 39% (W/L 29/ 46). Pauwels has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 55/ 41), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 12/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Stanke has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.83% of matches (W/L 28/ 25), where as Pauwels has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Stanke has played against opponents with an average rank of 29.38 while Pauwels has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Stanke has won 61% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pauwels has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Stanke has converted 38.89% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pauwels has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Stanke 0 - 0 Pauwels
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
863
Rank
602
High
25
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
46% (57-66)
Career Total W/L
55% (157-129)
58% (7-5)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| w/o | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Cedric Stanke | Maxime Pauwels |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (7/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (16/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (162/150) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 58% (7/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.1 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 16 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.1 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 15 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 64.92 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (308/462) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (213/308) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (76/154) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 37% (16/43) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (190/476) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 58% (7/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (7/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (6/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (6/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (6/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Cedric Stanke Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats 
Grigoriy Lomakin
Player
Cedric Stanke
79%
(
74 of
94)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
89)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
53 of
74)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
31 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 6-7(7) 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 1-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-6 7-6(8) 10-8 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Martyn Pawelski
Player
Cedric Stanke
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
73%
(
59 of
81)
10
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
5
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
81)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cedric Stanke
Player
Nour Fathalla
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
90
Total Points Won
65
|
6-1 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cedric Stanke
Player
Vladimir Uzhylovsky
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
70%
(
67 of
96)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
43 of
67)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
96)
83
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 7-5 10-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Vadym Ursu
Player
Cedric Stanke
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
64%
(
28 of
44)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
8 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cedric Stanke
Player
Aryan Lakshmanan
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cedric Stanke
Player
Andriy Poritskyy
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
53
|
3-6 6-1 10-8 | H2H | ||
view more
Maxime Pauwels Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Simon Beaupain
Player
Maxime Pauwels
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve %
63%
(
12 of
19)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
11 of
14)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
5 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
27
Total Points Won
13
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexis Gautier
Player
Maxime Pauwels
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Facundo Diaz Acosta
Player
Maxime Pauwels
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maxime Pauwels
Player
Mariano Kestelboim
62%
(
47 of
76)
1st Serve %
74%
(
57 of
77)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maxime Pauwels
Player
Maxime Chazal
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
77%
(
60 of
78)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
77
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Pauwels
Player
David Jorda Sanchis
65%
(
60 of
93)
1st Serve %
75%
(
55 of
73)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
38 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
86
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mathieu Perchicot
Player
Maxime Pauwels
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
65)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
6 of
31)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
26 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maxime Pauwels
Player
Joppe Van Malderen
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stanke Vs Pauwels Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
