Caty McNally vs Makenna Jones Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W L L W W W LH2H: McNally 1 - 0 Jones
They have played 2 sets in total, with McNally winning 2 and Jones winning 0. The last match between McNally and Jones was at the W50 Zephyrhills, 16-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Caty McNally getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Caty McNally | 1 |
| Makenna Jones | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W50 Zephyrhills(16-04-2025)
Caty McNally
Makenna Jones
6
1
6
2
| McNally | Stats | Jones |
|---|---|---|
| 68% (25-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 48% (15-16) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 213 | Ranking | 574 |
| 54 | Highest Rank | 236 |
| 23 | Age | 27 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 3 |
| 59% (176-121) | Career Total W/L | 60% (121-81) |
| $981,311 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Marino VS Knutson PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
24 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Jeanjean VS Erjavec PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
24 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Caty McNally
Player
Makenna Jones
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
3
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
7
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
2 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
46%
(
30 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:41:9 | Average Match Time | 1:41:9 |
| 66% (43/65) | 1st Serve % | 56% (27/48) |
| 60% (26/43) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (14/27) |
| 41% (9/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 10% (2/21) |
| 70% (7/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 27% (3/11) |
| 67% (32/48) | Return Points Win % | 46% (30/65) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
McNally vs Jones Match Preview :
When it comes to predicting the outcome of a tennis match, every statistic tells a part of the story. Let's start by delving into the performance on second serves. Over the past six months, McNally has managed to secure 36.75% of points on her second serve. In a slightly better position, Jones has won 38.46% of these points. Such figures have a strong link to accurate match predictions, giving Jones a slight upper hand here.
Analyzing the return game stats reveals even more. Recently, McNally has claimed 52.64% of points on her opponent’s second serves, but Jones surpasses her with 54.81%. When it comes to first serve returns, McNally trails once more with a 32.2% success rate, while Jones stands stronger with 36.99%. This data suggests a slight edge for Jones in their head-to-head matchup.
How well do these players perform under pressure? Examining their breakpoint save percentages offers some insights. McNally has thwarted 39.08% of breakpoints, yet Jones excels at a notably higher 50.3%. This statistic is pivotal, hinting at Jones' superior capability to handle in-game pressure better, a valuable insight for in-game betting predictions.
The overall performance record over the last year showcases a stark contrast. While McNally hasn't secured a win, resulting in a 0% victory rate (W/L 0/0), Jones has triumphed in 54.05% of her matches (W/L 20/17). This gives a decisive advantage in favor of Jones in the head-to-head prediction scenario.
Considering the quality of opponents faced over the past year, this gives context to their performances. Unfortunately, McNally's data leaves us with an incomplete narrative, but Jones has competed against players averaging a rank of 131.05, suggesting she's been consistently tested against decent competition.
Should the match reach a deciding set, the stats become even more telling. McNally has not won a single deciding set in the last 12 months, while Jones boasts a remarkable 73% success rate in such scenarios. This influential data tilts the scales heavily in favor of Jones for live match predictions and betting.
Current event statistics can indicate the form of a player during a tournament. Although past performances can forecast future outcomes, observing how each player is currently faring can also shape expectations. Special attention should be paid to their past performances in similar events, as preferences for certain settings could influence the result.
One more significant factor is breakpoint conversion. McNally has accomplished a 39.2% conversion rate on these critical points, compared to Jones, who has achieved a more efficient 44.7%. This final insight underscores Jones' capability to capitalize on scoring opportunities when presented, a crucial factor in live betting scenarios.
In the grand tapestry of these statistics, Jones emerges as the more likely victor in this imminent clash. Her slight advantages across several metrics point toward a favorable outcome for her. Expect Jones to leverage her recent form, in-game resilience, and breakpoint proficiency to secure the win.
McNally vs Jones Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Caty McNally Recent Matches Played
No Recent Matches Available
Makenna Jones Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Angela Fita Boluda
Player
Makenna Jones
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
49
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Makenna Jones
Player
Alina Korneeva
65%
(
66 of
101)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
0
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
11
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
26%
(
9 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
54%
(
55 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
44 of
82)
90
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Makenna Jones
Player
Malene Helgo
63%
(
59 of
93)
1st Serve %
56%
(
51 of
91)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
5
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
45%
(
42 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Makenna Jones
Player
Lucie Nguyen Tan
60%
(
52 of
86)
1st Serve %
50%
(
46 of
92)
0
Aces
7
16
Double Faults
12
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
15 of
46)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
48%
(
41 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
92)
93
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ekaterine Gorgodze
Player
Makenna Jones
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve %
71%
(
27 of
38)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
11)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
50
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Bella Payne
Player
Makenna Jones
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
10
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
41%
(
18 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Makenna Jones
Player
Katerina Shabashkevich
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
1
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
4
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
48%
(
29 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gergana Topalova
Player
Makenna Jones
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
55%
(
22 of
40)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
50
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (176/121) | Win/Loss | 60% (121/81) |
| 0% (0/0) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (263/192) |
| 0% (0/0) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (2235/1969) |
| 53% (70/61) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (60/39) |
| 59% (46/32) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (58/39) |
| 71% (37/15) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (3/3) |
| 64% (23/13) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 0 | Aces Total | 55 |
| 0 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.41 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 838 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:28:45 |
| 0 | Average Opponent Rank | 443.36 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 65% (7392/11419) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (4359/7392) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (1682/4027) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (751/1538) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 48% (5344/11037) |
| 50% (17/17) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 36% (8/14) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (43/40) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 68% (92/43) | Challenger W/L | 57% (87/66) |
| 70% (16/7) | Futures W/L | 72% (34/13) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (119/198) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (29/52) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (33/56) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (109/99) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (109/10) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (93/22) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
