Caty Mcnally vs Maddison Inglis Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mcnally vs Inglis analysis and find out who is favored!
Caty Mcnally vs Maddison Inglis Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mcnally has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Inglis has won 48.52%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mcnally, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Inglis has won 53.55%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 40% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mcnally has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Inglis has saved 56.98% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mcnally has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Inglis winning 58.18% (W/L 32/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mcnally has played against opponents with an average rank of while Inglis has played against players with an average rank of 289.89.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mcnally has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Inglis has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mcnally has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Inglis has converted 47.69% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mcnally 0 - 0 Inglis
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
R
Plays
7
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Caty Mcnally | Maddison Inglis |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 1st Match | 65% (11/6) |
Sets Win/Loss | 1st Match | 65% (26/14) |
Games Win/Loss | 1st Match | 57% (207/157) |
Hard Win/Loss | 1st Match | 44% (4/5) |
Clay Win/Loss | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 1st Match | 88% (7/1) |
Aces pg | 1st Match | 0.35 |
Aces Total | 1st Match | 61 |
DFs per game | 1st Match | 0.34 |
DFs Total | 1st Match | 60 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:43:27 |
Avg Opp Rank | 1st Match | 234.12 |
1st Serve % | 1st Match | 63% (676/1066) |
1st Serve W% | 1st Match | 67% (454/676) |
2nd Serve W% | 1st Match | 50% (196/390) |
BPs Won% Total | 1st Match | 46% (67/146) |
Return Pts W% | 1st Match | 46% (550/1202) |
Slam W/L | 1st Match | 67% (2/1) |
Masters W/L | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 1st Match | 0% (0/1) |
Tour Finals W/L | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 1st Match | 69% (9/4) |
Futures W/L | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 1st Match | 65% (11/17) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 1st Match | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 1st Match | 100% (3/3) |
Deciding Set W% | 1st Match | 33% (2/6) |
1st set W, W | 1st Match | 90% (10/9) |
1st set W, L | 1st Match | 10% (10/1) |
1st set L, W | 1st Match | 29% (7/2) |
Caty Mcnally Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Maria Lourdes Carle
Player
Caty McNally
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
87)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
50%
(
25 of
50)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
47%
(
35 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
87)
82
Total Points Won
80
|
0-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Caty McNally
Player
Jule Niemeier
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
2
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
3
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
21%
(
4 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
52%
(
33 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sara Errani
Player
Caty McNally
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
47%
(
27 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jaqueline Cristian
Player
Caty McNally
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
64
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jodie Anna Burrage
Player
Caty McNally
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
83%
(
40 of
48)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Anastasia Potapova
Player
Caty McNally
55%
(
48 of
88)
1st Serve %
73%
(
89 of
122)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
46 of
89)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
24%
(
6 of
25)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
61 of
122)
111
Total Points Won
99
|
3-6 6-2 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Caty McNally
Player
Lauren Davis
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
47 of
70)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Celine Naef
Player
Caty McNally
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve %
69%
(
72 of
104)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
43 of
72)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
50 of
104)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Caty McNally
Player
Katie Volynets
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
F | w/o | H2H |
view more
Maddison Inglis Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Sayaka Ishii
Player
Maddison Inglis
56%
(
80 of
144)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
90)
5
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
7
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
52%
(
33 of
64)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
44%
(
64 of
144)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
90)
119
Total Points Won
115
|
6-7(3) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Maddison Inglis
Player
Shiho Akita
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ena Shibahara
Player
Maddison Inglis
76%
(
57 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Maegan Manasse
Player
Maddison Inglis
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Maddison Inglis
Player
Arianne Hartono
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
49%
(
39 of
79)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
10
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
Player
Maddison Inglis
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
11
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Maddison Inglis
Player
Sarah Rokusek
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
6
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
32%
(
24 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
90
Total Points Won
63
|
5-7 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Maddison Inglis
Player
Amelia Zylberman
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
F | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
SF |
Maddison Inglis
Player
Sakura Hosogi
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
73%
(
29 of
40)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H |
view more