N. B. Zanotti
To Win
A. Friedsam
To Win
Catherine Cartan Bellis vs Anna-Lena Friedsam Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W W W W L
Form
L W W L W W W W L LHead-To-Head: Bellis 1 - 1 Friedsam
They have played 5 sets in total, with Bellis winning 3 and Friedsam winning 2. The last match between Bellis and Friedsam was at the W80 Tyler, 29-10-2020, Round: First, Surface: Hard, with Catherine Cartan Bellis getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Catherine Cartan Bellis | 1 |
| Anna-Lena Friedsam | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W80 Tyler(29-10-2020)
Catherine Cartan Bellis
Anna-Lena Friedsam
6
3
6
3
| Bellis | Stats | Friedsam |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 74% (28-10) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| Ret. | Ranking | 232 |
| 35 | Highest Rank | 45 |
| 26 | Age | 31 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 8 | Titles | 15 |
| 67% (139-67) | Career Total W/L | 60% (389-256) |
| $866,825 | Career Prize Money | $1,078,782 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
23 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Draxl VS Lajovic PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
23 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Carabelli VS Quinn PREDICTION Grass
Mallorca Championships - Mallorca atp
23 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Catherine Cartan Bellis
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
| 1-6 7-6(1) 6-3 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Catherine Cartan Bellis
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
82)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
85
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 27 | Games Won | 20 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:32:19 | Average Match Time | 1:32:19 |
| 63% (92/145) | 1st Serve % | 66% (97/146) |
| 65% (60/92) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (56/97) |
| 45% (24/53) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (19/49) |
| 67% (12/18) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 37% (7/19) |
| 49% (71/146) | Return Points Win % | 42% (61/145) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Catherine Cartan Bellis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Katarzyna Kawa
Player
Catherine Cartan Bellis
70%
(
63 of
90)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
84)
2
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
3
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
8 of
35)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
45 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
48 of
84)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Catherine Cartan Bellis
Player
Aliona Bolsova
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
75
Total Points Won
48
|
7-6(0) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF | w/o | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Catherine Cartan Bellis
Player
Aliona Bolsova
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
74
|
6-0 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Catherine Cartan Bellis
Player
Jamie Loeb
60%
(
61 of
102)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
41 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
94
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Catherine Cartan Bellis
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F | 6-4 6-7(4) ret. | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Catherine Cartan Bellis
Player
Varvara Lepchenko
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
13 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
48
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Anna-Lena Friedsam Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Alexis Blokhina
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
76%
(
78 of
103)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
46 of
78)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
35 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
49 of
103)
97
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
72%
(
64 of
89)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
88)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
81
|
6-7(4) 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Noma Akugue Noha
60%
(
59 of
99)
1st Serve %
62%
(
66 of
107)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
7
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
42 of
66)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
25%
(
5 of
20)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
41%
(
41 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
48 of
107)
106
Total Points Won
100
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Sofia Shapatava
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
23%
(
8 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
9 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Tessa Johanna Brockmann
71%
(
61 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
91)
87
Total Points Won
90
|
1-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Joanna Garland
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Sara Errani
65%
(
68 of
104)
1st Serve %
88%
(
73 of
83)
4
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
3
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
41%
(
43 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
97
Total Points Won
90
|
1-6 6-0 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67% (139/67) | Win/Loss | 60% (389/256) |
| 63% (300/175) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (874/626) |
| 55% (2346/1925) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (7466/6457) |
| 69% (102/46) | Hard Win/Loss | 56% (101/79) |
| 56% (22/17) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (137/92) |
| 86% (12/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (135/66) |
| 60% (3/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 46% (16/19) |
| 0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
| 241 | Aces Total | 1511 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 554 | Total Double Faults | 1620 |
| 1:10:56 | Average Match Time | 1:10:40 |
| 437.03 | Average Opponent Rank | 449.37 |
| 60% (6596/10967) | 1st Serve % | 65% (21595/33215) |
| 64% (4191/6596) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (14095/21595) |
| 47% (2035/4371) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (5357/11618) |
| 49% (732/1499) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1644/3622) |
| 47% (5069/10848) | Return Points Win % | 43% (14010/32822) |
| 54% (13/11) | Slam W/L | 38% (21/35) |
| 61% (20/13) | Masters W/L | 33% (10/20) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 40% (2/3) |
| 58% (22/16) | Main Tour W/L | 53% (101/90) |
| 77% (82/25) | Challenger W/L | 69% (204/93) |
| 50% (2/2) | Futures W/L | 77% (51/15) |
| 67% (136/203) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (380/631) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 56% (20/36) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (86/168) |
| 62% (40/65) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (119/220) |
| 89% (131/117) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (385/329) |
| 10% (131/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (385/55) |
| 27% (75/20) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (260/59) |
Bellis vs. Friedsam Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
