J. A. M. Clar
To Win
C. Ruud
To Win
Casper Ruud vs Hamad Medjedovic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W W W W W W
Form
W L W L W W W L L LHead To Head: Ruud 1 - 0 Medjedovic
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ruud winning 2 and Medjedovic winning 0. The last match between Ruud and Medjedovic was at the Barcelona Open Banc Sabadell - Barcelona, 16-04-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Clay, with Casper Ruud getting the victory 7-5 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Casper Ruud | 1 |
| Hamad Medjedovic | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Barcelona Open Banc Sabadell - Barcelona(16-04-2025)
7
5
7
5
| Ruud | Stats | Medjedovic |
|---|---|---|
| 79% (23-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 68% (17-8) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 7 | Ranking | 72 |
| 2 | Highest Rank | 61 |
| 26 | Age | 21 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 16 | Titles | 9 |
| 65% (432-231) | Career Total W/L | 64% (162-92) |
| $13,076,890 | Career Prize Money | $764,910 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
13 May 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fils VS Zverev PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome atp
13 May 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sinner VS Cerundolo PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome atp
13 May 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Ruud VS Medjedovic H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 7-5 |
Stats 
Casper Ruud
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
59%
(
55 of
93)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
89)
3
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
1
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
41%
(
38 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
88
|
||||
Ruud VS Medjedovic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 14 | Games Won | 10 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 2:8:15 | Average Match Time | 2:8:15 |
| 59% (55/93) | 1st Serve % | 66% (59/89) |
| 62% (34/55) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (37/59) |
| 55% (21/38) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (13/30) |
| 40% (4/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 18% (2/11) |
| 44% (39/89) | Return Points Win % | 41% (38/93) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ruud vs Medjedovic Match Preview :
When peering into the stats of second-serve performance over the past six months, the subtle differences between Casper Ruud and Medjedovic emerge like a finely tuned symphony — with Ruud clinching 47.92% of points and Medjedovic close behind at 45.14%. Such stats are instrumental in predicting match outcomes due to their solid correlation with match prediction accuracy. What insights do these figures reveal about each player's prowess on the court?
In the return game arena, the stats continue to tell an intriguing story. Ruud has managed to seize 44.13% of his opponent's second-serve points, slightly edging out Medjedovic, who has 42.38%. On first-serve returns, those numbers dip just a tad, with Ruud at 24.29% and Medjedovic at 23.97%. Are these percentages secrets to unraveling the potential victor in this head-to-head clash?
The narrative of resilience emerges in their capacity to save break points, where Ruud comes out with a slight edge, saving 59.76%, compared to Medjedovic's 54.77%. As we consider each player's form throughout the last year, Ruud's victory rate hit 64.06% out of 64 matches, while Medjedovic boasted a 68.92% win rate over 74 matches. Does this overall performance review provide a clearer lens through which we can forecast the outcome?
Their adeptness on various surfaces offers valuable clues. Both players shine brightly on clay with a 69% win rate, yet they falter on other grounds, as Ruud's struggle becomes apparent on Grass with a 38% win rate, and Medjedovic finds Hard courts less forgiving at a 59% success rate. How do these stats on surface conditions influence the matchup's dynamics?
Examining the past year, Ruud has navigated the Main tour with a commanding 75% win rate, contrasting Medjedovic's predominance on the Challenger and ITF circuits with 70.37% victory. Through this statistical prism, do we gauge a more experienced contender in Ruud? Furthermore, their opponents' average ranking in recent battles — 97.88 for Ruud against Medjedovic's 206.41 — sharpens our understanding of their competitor quality.
In those nail-biting deciding set scenarios, Ruud has been slightly superior, clinching 68% of sets as opposed to Medjedovic's 65%. Such grit can sway predictions, especially when deciding set prowess is crucial. Breakpoint conversion also remains a factor to weigh, with Ruud at 28.16% and Medjedovic slightly nudging ahead at 28.93%. Could this narrowly tip the balance in Medjedovic’s favor when seizing break opportunities?
As fascinating as these statistics are, they merely form facets of a broader prediction tapestry. When intertwined, these figures whisper that Ruud, with his form and surface variety experience, could possess a marginally stronger claim to victory. But the fluidity of tennis assures us that each point, serve, and rally will pulse with untold possibilities, rendering the contest's outcome anything but preordained.
Ruud vs Medjedovic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Casper Ruud Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Matteo Berrettini
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
45
Total Points Won
34
|
7-5 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Alexander Bublik
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
95)
7
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
5
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
46 of
63)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
28%
(
22 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
95)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Jack Draper
59%
(
57 of
96)
1st Serve %
64%
(
65 of
102)
9
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
3
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
47 of
65)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
35 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
99
Total Points Won
99
|
7-5 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Francisco Cerundolo
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Daniil Medvedev
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Taylor Fritz
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
0
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Sebastian Korda
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
17 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Hamad Medjedovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
49%
(
39 of
79)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
63%
(
25 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
28 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
68%
(
92 of
135)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
109)
10
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
63 of
92)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
9%
(
2 of
22)
39%
(
52 of
135)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
109)
125
Total Points Won
119
|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
59%
(
55 of
93)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
89)
3
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
1
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
41%
(
38 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
71%
(
65 of
91)
5
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
6
81%
(
38 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
47 of
65)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
13 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
32 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Gabriel Diallo
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
79%
(
42 of
53)
5
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
15 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Hugo Dellien
70%
(
73 of
105)
1st Serve %
79%
(
81 of
103)
10
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
79%
(
58 of
73)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
60 of
81)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
31 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
35 of
103)
109
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(1) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
6
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Borna Gojo
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
96)
3
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
11 of
42)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
96)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65% (432/231) | Win/Loss | 64% (162/92) |
| 61% (1006/640) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (357/233) |
| 54% (8567/7226) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (3027/2577) |
| 61% (112/73) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (34/24) |
| 70% (248/106) | Clay Win/Loss | 67% (83/41) |
| 60% (67/44) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62% (38/23) |
| 38% (5/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 64% (7/4) |
| 0.37 | Aces Per Game | 0.61 |
| 2820 | Aces Total | 1668 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
| 1439 | Total Double Faults | 831 |
| 1:40:24 | Average Match Time | 1:37:38 |
| 311.61 | Average Opponent Rank | 308.76 |
| 65% (30050/46226) | 1st Serve % | 62% (10632/17087) |
| 71% (21434/30050) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (7694/10632) |
| 54% (8660/16176) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (3294/6455) |
| 41% (1785/4330) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (699/1641) |
| 38% (17532/46100) | Return Points Win % | 39% (6730/17220) |
| 67% (60/30) | Slam W/L | 67% (14/7) |
| 62% (79/49) | Masters W/L | 53% (8/7) |
| 76% (26/8) | Cups W/L | 67% (2/1) |
| 67% (137/69) | Main Tour W/L | 59% (32/22) |
| 54% (7/6) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 58% (60/44) | Challenger W/L | 63% (63/37) |
| 71% (60/24) | Futures W/L | 70% (43/18) |
| 66% (377/574) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (152/239) |
| 63% (52/83) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 56% (5/9) |
| 50% (121/240) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (51/103) |
| 61% (121/198) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (42/72) |
| 90% (409/370) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (159/142) |
| 10% (409/39) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (159/17) |
| 25% (254/63) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (94/19) |
Ruud vs. Medjedovic Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
