Carson Branstine vs Sara Daavettila Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L W W L L W L
Form
W W L L W W W L L LHead To Head: Branstine 1 - 0 Daavettila
They have played 2 sets in total, with Branstine winning 2 and Daavettila winning 0. The last match between Branstine and Daavettila was at the W50 Santo Domingo, 28-03-2025, Round: Quarterfinals, Surface: Hard, with Carson Branstine getting the victory 6-3 5-0 ret..
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Carson Branstine | 1 |
| Sara Daavettila | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W50 Santo Domingo(28-03-2025)
Carson Branstine
Sara Daavettila
6
3
5
0
| Branstine | Stats | Daavettila |
|---|---|---|
| 64% (21-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 68% (19-9) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 195 | Ranking | 463 |
| 192 | Highest Rank | 444 |
| 24 | Age | 27 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 7 | Titles | 3 |
| 65% (133-71) | Career Total W/L | 62% (138-86) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Muller VS Mensik PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris atp
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Droguet VS Hanfmann PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris atp
23 May 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Branstine VS Daavettila H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 5-0 ret. |
Stats 
Carson Branstine
Player
Sara Daavettila
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
52
Total Points Won
27
|
||||
Branstine VS Daavettila H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 11 | Games Won | 3 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:1:16 | Average Match Time | 1:1:16 |
| 68% (25/37) | 1st Serve % | 62% (26/42) |
| 84% (21/25) | 1st Serve Win % | 46% (12/26) |
| 58% (7/12) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (6/16) |
| 67% (4/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (24/42) | Return Points Win % | 24% (9/37) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Branstine vs Daavettila Match Preview :
In recent play, Branstine has demonstrated a stronger second serve, achieving a 41.58% point win rate over the past six months, while Daavettila stands at 33.95%. The effectiveness in second serve performance often correlates with match prediction accuracy, providing a key insight into each player's potential outcome in this encounter.
Examining the return game statistics, Branstine has claimed 45.8% of points from their opponents’ second serves, whereas Daavettila has won 51.81%. For returns on first serves, Branstine has a 31.25% win rate compared to Daavettila’s 36.73%. These return stats can significantly influence predictions about the head-to-head (H2H) matchup between the two players.
Branstine has an edge in saving breakpoints, with a 51.15% success rate, outpacing Daavettila’s 46.43%. Additionally, examining breakpoint conversion rates, Branstine converts 48.44% of opportunities, slightly outperforming Daavettila’s 44.49%. These numbers reflect critical performance under pressure, valuable for betting insights.
When reviewing year-long performances, Branstine has a match win percentage of 65.38% (W/L 34/18), marginally outperformed by Daavettila’s 68.92% (W/L 51/23). This provides an overall perspective in predicting a potential favorite in this matchup. Surface-specific statistics show that both players excel on hard courts, with Branstine winning 69% (W/L 84/37) and Daavettila at 65% (W/L 109/59) on their favored surface.
Regarding player levels over the last year, Branstine has competed primarily in Challengers/ITF $10K tournaments, securing victory in 68% of matches (W/L 34/16). Daavettila, participating mostly in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events, shows a higher win percentage at 77.27% (W/L 34/10). These figures highlight the relative strength of each player concerning the tournament level.
Another aspect to consider is the quality of competition faced. Branstine has challenged opponents averaging rank 326.65, compared to Daavettila’s 366.43. If the match tightens to a deciding set, Daavettila holds a slight advantage, winning 59% of such scenarios compared to Branstine’s 56% over the past 12 months.
Given these comprehensive statistics, Daavettila appears to have a slight edge in this upcoming contest due to superior overall match win percentages, stronger return games, and a higher success rate in deciding set situations. However, Branstine's adeptness at saving breakpoints and their favorable second serve performance suggests a competitive face-off ahead.
Branstine vs Daavettila Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Carson Branstine Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Carson Branstine
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Whitney Osuigwe
49%
(
33 of
68)
1st Serve %
76%
(
38 of
50)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
49%
(
33 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petra Marcinko
Player
Carson Branstine
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
70%
(
45 of
64)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
54%
(
15 of
28)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
55%
(
23 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
39 of
64)
58
Total Points Won
48
|
7-6(2) 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hanne Vandewinkel
Player
Carson Branstine
68%
(
63 of
92)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
95)
1
Aces
0
12
Double Faults
4
44%
(
28 of
63)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
24%
(
7 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
62%
(
57 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
54 of
95)
89
Total Points Won
98
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Dominika Salkova
44%
(
34 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
42%
(
18 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
49%
(
38 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 0-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Julie Pastikova
51%
(
31 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Pridankina
Player
Carson Branstine
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lian Tran
Player
Carson Branstine
74%
(
72 of
97)
1st Serve %
67%
(
72 of
107)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
53%
(
38 of
72)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
72)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
44 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
107)
104
Total Points Won
100
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Sara Daavettila Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Marie Weckerle
Player
Sara Daavettila
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
24 of
39)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Sara Daavettila
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
52
Total Points Won
27
|
6-3 5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Sara Daavettila
Player
Lea Boskovic
66%
(
88 of
133)
1st Serve %
64%
(
75 of
118)
2
Aces
3
11
Double Faults
6
55%
(
48 of
88)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
44%
(
20 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
13 of
43)
43%
(
10 of
23)
Break Points Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
49%
(
65 of
133)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
65 of
118)
133
Total Points Won
118
|
6-4 6-7(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sara Daavettila
Player
Stacey Fung
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
2
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
4
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
27%
(
8 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
47%
(
41 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Daavettila
Player
Jessica Failla
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
73%
(
67 of
92)
0
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
47%
(
29 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
52 of
92)
85
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 5-7 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Christasha McNeil
Player
Sara Daavettila
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
74%
(
40 of
54)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65% (133/71) | Win/Loss | 62% (138/86) |
| 63% (291/174) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (299/198) |
| 55% (2305/1878) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (2455/1977) |
| 70% (87/37) | Hard Win/Loss | 64% (109/62) |
| 63% (40/24) | Clay Win/Loss | 47% (8/9) |
| 38% (6/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58% (21/15) |
| 0.2 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 411 | Aces Total | 73 |
| 0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.45 |
| 683 | Total Double Faults | 979 |
| 1:28:3 | Average Match Time | 1:25:20 |
| 450.25 | Average Opponent Rank | 448.13 |
| 61% (7390/12183) | 1st Serve % | 67% (7675/11463) |
| 64% (4754/7390) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (4580/7675) |
| 45% (2180/4793) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (1546/3788) |
| 50% (769/1536) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 53% (905/1713) |
| 47% (5578/11916) | Return Points Win % | 51% (5876/11614) |
| 50% (1/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/5) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 65% (92/49) | Challenger W/L | 53% (70/62) |
| 74% (40/14) | Futures W/L | 74% (68/24) |
| 65% (132/202) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (138/224) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (23/46) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 45% (17/38) |
| 56% (32/57) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (26/49) |
| 91% (130/118) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (135/124) |
| 9% (130/12) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (135/11) |
| 20% (74/15) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (89/14) |
Branstine vs. Daavettila Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
