J. Niemeier
To Win
D. Semenistaja
To Win
Carson Branstine vs Jule Niemeier Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W W L W W W L
Form
W L L L L W L W L LHead-2-Head: Branstine 1 - 0 Niemeier
They have played 2 sets in total, with Branstine winning 2 and Niemeier winning 0. The last match between Branstine and Niemeier was at the Libema Open - 's-Hertogenbosch, 07-06-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Grass, with Carson Branstine getting the victory 6-3 7-6(2).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Carson Branstine | 1 |
| Jule Niemeier | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Libema Open - 's-Hertogenbosch(07-06-2025)
Carson Branstine
Jule Niemeier
6
3
7
6
| Branstine | Stats | Niemeier |
|---|---|---|
| 64% (27-15) | YTD Win/Loss | 32% (9-19) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 178 | Ranking | 184 |
| 178 | Highest Rank | 61 |
| 24 | Age | 25 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 7 | Titles | 5 |
| 65% (139-74) | Career Total W/L | 57% (217-165) |
| $112,624 | Career Prize Money | $1,711,140 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Collignon VS Kopriva PREDICTION Clay
Plava Laguna Croatia Open - Umag atp
20 Jul 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Evans VS Bergs PREDICTION Hard
Citi Open - Washington atp
20 Jul 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-6(2) |
Stats 
Carson Branstine
Player
Jule Niemeier
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
44%
(
29 of
66)
5
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
13
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 13 |
| 1:25:25 | Average Match Time | 1:25:25 |
| 56% (38/68) | 1st Serve % | 44% (29/66) |
| 58% (22/38) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (19/29) |
| 67% (20/30) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (16/37) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 60% (3/5) |
| 47% (31/66) | Return Points Win % | 38% (26/68) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Branstine vs Niemeier Match Preview :
- Second Serve Performance: Recently, Niemeier has a slight edge in second serve performance, winning 40.51% of points compared to Branstine's 40.2%. Does Niemeier's slight edge better forecast a match win? It's a close call, but every point matters.
- Return Game Stats: Niemeier outperforms Branstine on opponents’ second serves by winning 51.11% of points, compared to Branstine’s 48.51%. On the first serve, Branstine edges slightly ahead with 34.94% against Niemeier’s 34.04%. This balanced performance may indicate a minor advantage.
- Under Pressure: Branstine has the upper hand in saving breakpoints, managing to save 50.47% compared to Niemeier’s 44.55%. Who benefits most from this resilience? Branstine’s ability to withstand pressure could be crucial.
- Performance Overview: Branstine's year-long match winning rate is significantly higher at 59.65% versus Niemeier's 31.58%. Is Branstine’s consistent performance a decisive factor? It's certainly a compelling advantage.
- Best Surface: Niemeier excels on clay with a win rate of 64%, while Branstine shines on hard courts with a 70% win rate. How critical is the surface in deciding the match? The surface could tilt the balance.
- Player Level: Niemeier mostly plays on the Main tour with a 30.77% win rate, whereas Branstine frequents the Challenger/ITF circuit with a 62.26% win rate. Does the level of play give Niemeier a competitive edge? It adds complexity to the prediction.
- Opponent Quality: Niemeier consistently faces tougher competition with opponents averaging a rank of 103.32 compared to Branstine's 324.61. Does playing higher-ranked opponents prepare Niemeier better? It might boost Niemeier's experience.
- Deciding Set Performance: In deciding sets, Branstine performs better, winning 41% compared to Niemeier's 31%. Does this indicate Branstine's endurance and mental strength in tight situations? It's a favorable sign for Branstine.
- Break Point Conversion: Branstine converts breakpoints at 44.74%, above Niemeier’s 38.93%. Is Branstine’s efficiency a game-changer? Successfully capitalizing on opportunities could be pivotal.
Editorial Prediction (June 7, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Niemeier and Branstine appears to be tightly contested, with each player displaying unique strengths.
Niemeier shows a minor advantage in recent second serve performance and superior metrics against higher-ranked opponents, which could be useful in a challenging match environment.
Branstine, on the other hand, demonstrates a higher win rate over the past year, resilience under pressure, and strong performance on the hard court surface.
Given Branstine's advantage in converting breakpoints and better performance in deciding sets, the edge slightly swings in her favor.
Overall, based on these stats and recent trends, Branstine is likely to emerge victorious in this upcoming tennis encounter.
Branstine vs Niemeier Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Carson Branstine Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Carson Branstine
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
3
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Raluca Georgiana Serban
73%
(
81 of
111)
1st Serve %
68%
(
88 of
130)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
10
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
50 of
88)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
25%
(
5 of
20)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
37%
(
41 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
61 of
130)
131
Total Points Won
110
|
4-6 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Bianca Vanessa Andreescu
70%
(
62 of
89)
1st Serve %
66%
(
65 of
99)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
35%
(
31 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
99)
100
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(3) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Lois Boisson
52%
(
42 of
81)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
93)
6
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
1
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
45 of
62)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
25 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 6-7(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Carson Branstine
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
49%
(
35 of
72)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
11 of
37)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
51%
(
27 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
44 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Liudmila Samsonova
58%
(
56 of
96)
1st Serve %
61%
(
56 of
92)
6
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
38 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
92)
100
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Yue Yuan
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
70%
(
45 of
64)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Jule Niemeier
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
44%
(
29 of
66)
5
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
13
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Jule Niemeier Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Dayana Yastremska
Player
Jule Niemeier
55%
(
42 of
77)
1st Serve %
44%
(
28 of
63)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
16
48%
(
20 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
7 of
35)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
52%
(
40 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lucia Bronzetti
Player
Jule Niemeier
63%
(
60 of
96)
1st Serve %
52%
(
40 of
77)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
13
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
38 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
94
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Nao Hibino
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
20 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Ella Seidel
Player
Jule Niemeier
48%
(
24 of
50)
1st Serve %
45%
(
25 of
55)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Mai Hontama
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
3
Aces
0
13
Double Faults
3
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Jule Niemeier
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
44%
(
29 of
66)
5
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
13
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Darja Semenistaja
Player
Jule Niemeier
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve %
49%
(
42 of
86)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
12
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
13 of
44)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
48%
(
38 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
46 of
86)
87
Total Points Won
78
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sara Errani
Player
Jule Niemeier
81%
(
70 of
86)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
91)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
11
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
47%
(
40 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
91
|
0-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65% (139/74) | Win/Loss | 57% (217/165) |
| 62% (304/184) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (496/376) |
| 55% (2425/1990) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (4287/3812) |
| 70% (87/37) | Hard Win/Loss | 44% (38/49) |
| 63% (40/24) | Clay Win/Loss | 63% (130/75) |
| 38% (6/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55% (31/25) |
| 67% (6/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 53% (18/16) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.34 |
| 464 | Aces Total | 1330 |
| 0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.55 |
| 715 | Total Double Faults | 2172 |
| 1:28:47 | Average Match Time | 1:38:11 |
| 449.21 | Average Opponent Rank | 345.17 |
| 61% (7840/12916) | 1st Serve % | 56% (14473/25833) |
| 64% (5053/7840) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (9562/14446) |
| 46% (2313/5076) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (5111/11398) |
| 50% (808/1623) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1508/3219) |
| 47% (5907/12674) | Return Points Win % | 45% (11681/25763) |
| 67% (4/2) | Slam W/L | 60% (25/17) |
| 0% (0/5) | Masters W/L | 35% (9/17) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 29% (2/5) |
| 50% (3/3) | Main Tour W/L | 49% (46/48) |
| 65% (92/50) | Challenger W/L | 62% (123/74) |
| 74% (40/14) | Futures W/L | 75% (12/4) |
| 65% (138/211) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (212/372) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 53% (27/51) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (38/75) |
| 58% (36/62) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (50/114) |
| 90% (136/123) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (231/197) |
| 10% (136/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (231/34) |
| 21% (77/16) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (151/20) |
Branstine vs. Niemeier Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
