Carolyn Ansari vs Anna Siskova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W W W W L L
Form
W W W W W W W W W LHead-to-head: Ansari 0 - 1 Siskova
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ansari winning 0 and Siskova winning 2. The last match between Ansari and Siskova was at the W15 Sharm ElSheikh, 16-02-2025, Final, Hard with Anna Siskova getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
W15 Sharm ElSheikh(16-02-2025)
6
1
6
3
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Tomova VS McNally PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Cirstea VS Cocciaretto PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-3 |
Stats 
Anna Siskova
Player
Carolyn Ansari
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
Stats
0
H2H Matches
1
0
Sets Won
2
4
Games Won
12
0
Aces (Total)
2
4
Total Double Faults
1
1:21:58
Average Match Time
1:21:58
66% (38/58)
1st Serve %
69% (38/55)
42% (16/38)
1st Serve Win %
63% (24/38)
30% (6/20)
2nd Serve Win %
41% (7/17)
43% (3/7)
Break Points Won % (Total)
70% (7/10)
44% (24/55)
Return Points Win %
62% (36/58)
0% (0/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (1/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (0/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Carolyn Ansari vs Anna Siskova Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Carolyn Ansari 0 - 1 Anna Siskova
Recent performance indicates: Over the past six months, Ansari has maintained a 45.38% success rate on their second serve, while Siskova has achieved a slightly higher rate of 47.26%. Notably, there exists a significant correlation between this statistical measure and the accuracy of match predictions.
Return game statistics: In recent form, Ansari has effectively won 58.46% of their opponent's second serve points, whereas Siskova has achieved a slightly lower rate of 57.35%. Similarly, in the case of first serve returns, the respective percentages are 43.04% for Ansari and 52.82% for Siskova. Such figures hold considerable significance in determining the favored player in this Head-to-Head (H2H) matchup.
Under pressure analysis: When facing crucial moments, Ansari has successfully saved 50% of breakpoints in recent matches, whereas Siskova has managed to save 46.67%. This invaluable statistic lends itself well to making accurate in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the past year, Ansari has emerged victorious in 63.64% of their matches (with a win/loss record of 21/12), while Siskova boasts a slightly higher success rate of 65.71% (win/loss record of 23/12). Collectively, these numbers offer a comprehensive prediction overview of their head-to-head encounters.
Preferred playing surface: Ansari exhibits their superior performance on clay, with a career win percentage of 67% (win/loss record of 10/5). In contrast, their performance on indoor hard courts stands at a lower 29% win rate (win/loss record of 2/5). Conversely, Siskova excels on hard courts, boasting a career win percentage of 65% (win/loss record of 62/33), while struggling on grass with a mere 20% win rate (win/loss record of 1/4).
Player level analysis: In the past year, Ansari has predominantly competed in $10K Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, where they have emerged victorious in 72% of matches (win/loss record of 18/7). On the other hand, Siskova has primarily participated in $10K Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments and achieved an impressive win percentage of 89.47% (win/loss record of 17/2). It is crucial to consider the relative level of the events attended by each player when comparing their statistics to predict the favorite.
Opponent quality statistics: Over the course of the past 12 months, Ansari has faced opponents with an average rank of 403.52, while Siskova has encountered players with an average rank of 381.69.
Deciding set performance: For those interested in live predictions and betting, in matches stretching to a deciding set over the past year, Ansari has triumphed in 44% of such instances, while Siskova has achieved a slightly higher win rate of 47% in all matches played on the tour.
Current event head-to-head statistics: Evaluating previous player performances proves valuable in predicting tennis matches. However, once an event is underway, it becomes imperative to examine the current event statistics to gauge the players' current form. Please refer to the section below for detailed information on their performance in the ongoing event. Additionally, it is worth noting that certain players exhibit better performances in specific events, and this factor should be considered when determining the final outcome.
Break point conversion: In recent matches, Ansari has capitalized on 45.81% of breakpoint opportunities, while Siskova has impressively converted 56.25% of their chances to break their opponent's serve. This noteworthy statistic serves as a valuable indicator for in-game live betting tips whenever either player finds themselves with a breakpoint opportunity.
If you are interested in exploring statistical models for predicting tennis matches, you may find this article to be a useful resource. (Warning: Intended for statistics enthusiasts only)
Carolyn Ansari Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Isabella Maria Serban
Player
Carolyn Ansari
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
53
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Anna Siskova
Player
Carolyn Ansari
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Carolyn Ansari
Player
Carol Young Suh Lee
77%
(
78 of
101)
1st Serve %
57%
(
60 of
106)
0
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
39 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
106)
106
Total Points Won
101
|
7-5 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carolyn Ansari
Player
Ayumi Miyamoto
79%
(
67 of
85)
1st Serve %
75%
(
56 of
75)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
47%
(
40 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carolyn Ansari
Player
Tamara Kostic
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
57%
(
60 of
106)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
48 of
106)
95
Total Points Won
87
|
2-6 6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carolyn Ansari
Player
Anja Wildgruber
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
77%
(
48 of
62)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
58
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Katarina Kuzmova
Player
Carolyn Ansari
53%
(
58 of
110)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
89)
6
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
5
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
44%
(
23 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
47%
(
52 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
48 of
89)
106
Total Points Won
93
|
6-7(3) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Carolyn Ansari
Player
Varvara Panshina
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carolyn Ansari
Player
Yasmin Ezzat
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carolyn Ansari
Player
Iva Ivanova
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
10 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Anna Siskova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Anna Siskova
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
54 of
90)
0
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
8
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
48%
(
41 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
90)
86
Total Points Won
89
|
7-5 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Anna Siskova
Player
Isabella Shinikova
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna Siskova
Player
Evgeniya Burdina
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve %
55%
(
18 of
33)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
51
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna Siskova
Player
Arina Arifullina
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
3 of
23)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Siskova
Player
Iveta Dapkute
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Anna Siskova
Player
Elena-Teodora Cadar
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve %
70%
(
28 of
40)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Anna Siskova
Player
Isabella Shinikova
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna Siskova
Player
Evgeniya Burdina
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
72%
(
31 of
43)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna Siskova
Player
Isabella Maria Serban
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve %
72%
(
33 of
46)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
7 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
48
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Siskova
Player
Victoria Allen
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
60% (57/38)
Win/Loss
57% (234/179)
59% (126/86)
Sets Win/Loss
55% (525/438)
54% (1056/907)
Games Win/Loss
52% (4478/4082)
62% (45/28)
Hard Win/Loss
68% (72/34)
67% (10/5)
Clay Win/Loss
55% (140/113)
29% (2/5)
Indoor Hard W/L
43% (21/28)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
20% (1/4)
0.05
Aces Per Game
0.08
52
Aces Total
348
0.42
Double Faults Per Game
0.29
401
Total Double Faults
1207
1:26:23
Average Match Time
1:33:34
438
Average Opponent Rank
497.53
65% (3336/5158)
1st Serve %
68% (17625/26077)
60% (1995/3336)
1st Serve Win %
57% (10088/17625)
43% (775/1822)
2nd Serve Win %
43% (3641/8452)
49% (346/707)
Break Points Won % (Total)
51% (1860/3664)
48% (2503/5188)
Return Points Win %
49% (12794/26048)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
36% (4/7)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
52% (24/22)
Challenger W/L
47% (102/114)
67% (33/16)
Futures W/L
69% (128/57)
60% (56/94)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
56% (230/408)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
100% (1/1)
67% (12/18)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
51% (30/59)
43% (10/23)
Deciding Set Win %
57% (80/140)
86% (58/50)
1st Set Won, Won Match
84% (233/195)
14% (58/8)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
16% (233/38)
19% (37/7)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
22% (180/39)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
