Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Caroline Lampl vs Lexington Reed Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lampl vs Reed analysis and find out who is favored!
Caroline Lampl vs Lexington Reed Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lampl has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Reed has won 41.84%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lampl, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Reed has won 54.46%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 45.45% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lampl has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Reed has saved 48.48% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lampl has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Reed winning 37.5% (W/L 6/ 10) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lampl has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 20/ 11), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 22/ 12). Reed has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 20/ 16), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 15/ 19).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lampl winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Lampl winning 2 and Reed winning 0. The last match between Lampl and Reed was at the W15 Cancun, 29-09-2021, Q3, Hard with Caroline Lampl getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lampl and Reed have played a deciding set 0 times, with Lampl winning 0 times and Reed 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Lampl winning 0, and Reed 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lampl has played against opponents with an average rank of while Reed has played against players with an average rank of 48.75.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lampl has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Reed has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lampl has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Reed has converted 54.55% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lampl 1 - 0 Reed
809
Rank
619
High
26
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
18
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
65% (42-23)
Career Total W/L
50% (35-35)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
57% (4-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Caroline Lampl | Lexington Reed |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Caroline Lampl | Lexington Reed |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 56% (9/7) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (80/66) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.01 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 1 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 17 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 111.43 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 59% (141/239) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 59% (83/141) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 42% (41/98) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 55% (18/33) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 49% (115/233) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/7) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 75% (4/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (4/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/1) |
Caroline Lampl Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Jessica Hinojosa Gomez
Player
Caroline Lampl
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
42%
(
24 of
57)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
52%
(
17 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
46%
(
26 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Andrea Gamiz
Player
Caroline Lampl
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
38%
(
14 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Caroline Lampl
Player
Margaux Komano
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Irina Khromacheva
Player
Caroline Lampl
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
49%
(
24 of
49)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Caroline Lampl
Player
Nadiya Kolb
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Caroline Lampl
Player
Cecilie Wiche
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
21%
(
7 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
54
Total Points Won
23
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Karolina Kubanova
Player
Caroline Lampl
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
46%
(
33 of
71)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Caroline Lampl
Player
Vendula Valdmannova
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
51 of
82)
0
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
5
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
16%
(
4 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
7 of
31)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
88%
(
7 of
8)
62%
(
41 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
53 of
82)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
6-7(4) 6-2 10-7 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Caroline Lampl
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
53%
(
21 of
40)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Lexington Reed Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Katrina Scott
Player
Lexington Reed
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lexington Reed
Player
Maria Aran Teixido Garcia
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
8
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Sophie Chang
Player
Lexington Reed
53%
(
38 of
72)
1st Serve %
58%
(
48 of
83)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
10
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
49%
(
35 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
47 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lexington Reed
Player
Rhiann Newborn
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
5
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 5-7 6-0 12-10 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Rhea Verma
Player
Lexington Reed
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shatoo Mohamad
Player
Lexington Reed
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
48 of
76)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandy Walker
Player
Lexington Reed
49%
(
39 of
80)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
102)
5
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
12
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
34%
(
14 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
14 of
45)
36%
(
8 of
22)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
46%
(
37 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
54 of
102)
97
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Lampl Vs Reed Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
