Prediction of Caroline Garcia vs Suzan Lamens Head-to-Head, Best Odds & Picks At Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
57% (459-353)
Career Total W/L
58% (289-210)
0% (0-1)
YTD W/L
57% (4-3)
$10,284,086
Career Prize Money
$349,233
0
YTD Titles
0
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Caroline Garcia vs Suzan Lamens Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Garcia 0 - 0 Lamens
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Garcia has won 45.14% of points on their second serve, while Lamens has won 45.53%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Garcia, in recent form, has won 48.81% of their opponent's second serve points, while Lamens has won 54.06%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.41% and 40.73% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Garcia has saved 58.14% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lamens has saved 54.9% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Garcia has won 42.86% of matches played (W/L 12/ 16), with Lamens winning 63.64% (W/L 49/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Garcia has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 64% (W/L 52/ 29), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 222/ 186). Lamens has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 30/ 20), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 14% (W/L 1/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Garcia has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 50% of matches (W/L 6/ 6), where as Lamens has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 24/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Garcia has played against opponents with an average rank of 59.96 while Lamens has played against players with an average rank of 192.14.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Garcia has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lamens has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Garcia has converted 35.48% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lamens has converted 51.91% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Caroline Garcia Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Naomi Osaka
Player
Caroline Garcia
51%
(
41 of
81)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
7
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
0
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Magdalena Frech
Player
Caroline Garcia
62%
(
55 of
89)
1st Serve %
65%
(
58 of
89)
1
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
6
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
7 of
31)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Caroline Garcia
Player
Ena Shibahara
52%
(
44 of
84)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
10
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
4
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
87%
(
39 of
45)
65%
(
26 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
26 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
20 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Renata Zarazua
Player
Caroline Garcia
49%
(
29 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
0
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
7
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaqueline Cristian
Player
Caroline Garcia
62%
(
61 of
99)
1st Serve %
72%
(
78 of
108)
4
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
3
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
52 of
78)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
38 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
108)
104
Total Points Won
103
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Bernarda Pera
Player
Caroline Garcia
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
84)
13
Aces
12
8
Double Faults
3
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
41 of
55)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
27 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
25 of
84)
84
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caroline Garcia
Player
Anna Blinkova
49%
(
34 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
48 of
72)
6
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
1
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
33%
(
12 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
31 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sofia Kenin
Player
Caroline Garcia
81%
(
44 of
54)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
77)
1
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caroline Garcia
Player
Eva Lys
57%
(
62 of
108)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
91)
18
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
8
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
48%
(
22 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
42 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
107
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Suzan Lamens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Belinda Bencic
Player
Suzan Lamens
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
42 of
74)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
8 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Veronika Erjavec
57%
(
54 of
94)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
79)
3
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
2
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
94
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Suzan Lamens
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
8
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Renee Alame
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
6%
(
1 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Suzan Lamens
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Magdalena Frech
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
2
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Kamilla Rakhimova
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Leolia Jeanjean
Player
Suzan Lamens
66%
(
59 of
89)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
84)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
32 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
84)
90
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Robin Anderson
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nina Stojanovic
Player
Suzan Lamens
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
26 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Garcia vs Lamens?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Garcia Vs Lamens is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Caroline Garcia | Suzan Lamens |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/1) | 57% (4/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 57% (8/6) |
| Games Win/Loss | 44% (12/15) | 51% (68/66) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 57% (4/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.54 | 0.18 |
| Aces Total | 7 | 12 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.38 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 25 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:28:8 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 51 | 98.43 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (58/83) | 57% (259/451) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (35/58) | 66% (171/259) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 56% (14/25) | 46% (89/192) |
| BPs Won% Total | 33% (2/6) | 48% (21/44) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (28/81) | 43% (180/414) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 57% (4/7) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (4/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (4/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (3/0) |
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
