Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Caroline Garcia vs Louisa Chirico Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Garcia vs Chirico analysis and find out who is favored!
Caroline Garcia vs Louisa Chirico Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Garcia has won 49.01% of points on his second serve, while Chirico has won 46.18%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Garcia, in recent form, has won 48.55% of his opponent's second serve points, while Chirico has won 54.18%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.62% and 38.52% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Garcia has saved 52.31% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chirico has saved 48.96% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Garcia has won 53.33% of matches played (W/L 32/ 28), with Chirico winning 49.15% (W/L 29/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Garcia has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 65% (W/L 51/ 28), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 221/ 183). Chirico has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 142/ 91), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 5/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Garcia has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 57.69% of matches (W/L 15/ 11), where as Chirico has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.06% of matches (W/L 24/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Garcia winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Garcia winning 2 and Chirico winning 0. The last match between Garcia and Chirico was at the Engie Open de Limoges - Limoges, 15-11-2015, Final, I.hard with Caroline Garcia getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:4:41.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Garcia and Chirico have played a deciding set 0 times, with Garcia winning 0 times and Chirico 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Garcia winning 0, and Chirico 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Garcia has played against opponents with an average rank of 96.17 while Chirico has played against players with an average rank of 228.46.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Garcia has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chirico has won 58% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Garcia has converted 39.87% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chirico has converted 47.28% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Garcia 1 - 0 Chirico
23
Rank
4
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
284
Rank
58
High
27
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
Form
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
57% (453-344)
Career Total W/L
56% (290-230)
55% (11-9)
YTD W/L
41% (7-10)
$9,969,331
Career Prize Money
$623,285
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Caroline Garcia | Louisa Chirico |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:4:41 | 1:4:41 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (25/42) | 49% (26/53) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 84% (21/25) | 50% (13/26) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 71% (12/17) | 48% (13/27) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (27/53) | 21% (9/42) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-3 |
Stats 
Caroline Garcia
Player
Louisa Chirico
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Caroline Garcia | Louisa Chirico |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 55% (11/9) | 41% (7/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (27/25) | 44% (17/22) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (248/242) | 49% (190/196) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 53% (9/8) | 0% (0/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) | 46% (6/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.63 | 0.19 |
| Aces Total | 151 | 36 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.42 |
| DFs Total | 51 | 78 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:53 | 1:52:54 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 85.9 | 209.18 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (884/1496) | 63% (811/1287) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (639/884) | 59% (482/811) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (299/612) | 48% (229/476) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (57/148) | 50% (68/137) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (602/1588) | 44% (544/1248) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 67% (6/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 44% (7/9) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (11/20) | 41% (7/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 38% (3/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 58% (7/12) | 40% (2/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 71% (14/10) | 75% (8/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 29% (14/4) | 25% (8/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (6/1) | 11% (9/1) |
Caroline Garcia Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Caroline Garcia
Player
Anna Schmiedlova
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
100%
(
20 of
20)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
51
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caroline Garcia
Player
Elisabetta Cocciaretto
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
64%
(
57 of
89)
11
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
8
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
27 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Emma Raducanu
Player
Caroline Garcia
73%
(
69 of
95)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
76)
9
Aces
9
-
Double Faults
-
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
90
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Danielle Rose Collins
Player
Caroline Garcia
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Caroline Garcia
Player
Cori Gauff
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
1
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Caroline Garcia
Player
Naomi Osaka
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
12
Aces
16
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Caroline Garcia
Player
Viktoriya Tomova
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
76%
(
32 of
42)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Maria Sakkari
Player
Caroline Garcia
52%
(
33 of
64)
1st Serve %
48%
(
22 of
46)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
16 of
22)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Caroline Garcia
Player
Viktoriya Tomova
53%
(
43 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
9
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
8
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
83
Total Points Won
65
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Caroline Garcia
72%
(
58 of
81)
1st Serve %
60%
(
51 of
85)
7
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
90
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Louisa Chirico Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ashton Bowers
Player
Louisa Chirico
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
6
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
13
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
84)
84
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Simona Waltert
Player
Louisa Chirico
74%
(
78 of
105)
1st Serve %
67%
(
80 of
120)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
44 of
80)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
44%
(
46 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
58 of
120)
117
Total Points Won
108
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Louisa Chirico
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
20%
(
4 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Maria Bondarenko
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kamilla Rakhimova
Player
Louisa Chirico
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
1
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
50%
(
21 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
46%
(
32 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jessika Ponchet
Player
Louisa Chirico
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maribella Zamarripa
Player
Louisa Chirico
73%
(
84 of
115)
1st Serve %
58%
(
63 of
109)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
61%
(
51 of
84)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
39%
(
45 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
109)
119
Total Points Won
105
|
6-7(4) 7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Robin Montgomery
Player
Louisa Chirico
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Ava Markham
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuliia Starodubtseva
Player
Louisa Chirico
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
72%
(
43 of
60)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Garcia Vs Chirico Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Caroline Garcia
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
