Prediction of Caroline Garcia vs Jelena Ostapenko Head-to-Head, Best Odds & Picks At Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
57% (459-353)
Career Total W/L
62% (392-242)
0% (0-1)
YTD W/L
25% (1-3)
$10,284,086
Career Prize Money
$10,775,921
0
YTD Titles
0
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 5-7 6-4 |
Stats 
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Caroline Garcia
56%
(
66 of
117)
1st Serve %
57%
(
60 of
106)
3
Aces
15
10
Double Faults
4
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
44 of
60)
41%
(
21 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
46 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
106)
112
Total Points Won
111
|
||||
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Caroline Garcia
48%
(
29 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
7
Aces
3
12
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
| stats | Caroline Garcia | Jelena Ostapenko |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 4 |
| Games Won | 21 | 29 |
| Aces (Total) | 18 | 10 |
| DFs Total | 7 | 22 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:57:8 | 1:57:8 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (95/164) | 54% (95/177) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (65/95) | 77% (73/95) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 42% (29/69) | 43% (35/82) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (5/13) | 36% (9/25) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (69/177) | 43% (70/164) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Caroline Garcia vs Jelena Ostapenko Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Garcia 0 - 2 Ostapenko
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Garcia has won 45.14% of points on their second serve, while Ostapenko has won 36.32%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Garcia, in recent form, has won 48.81% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ostapenko has won 53.71%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.41% and 37.92% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Garcia has saved 58.14% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ostapenko has saved 51.3% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Garcia has won 42.86% of matches played (W/L 12/ 16), with Ostapenko winning 53.33% (W/L 24/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Garcia has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 64% (W/L 52/ 29), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 222/ 186). Ostapenko has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 69% (W/L 53/ 24), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 138/ 114).
- Player level: In the last year, Garcia has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 50% of matches (W/L 6/ 6), where as Ostapenko has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 55.56% of matches (W/L 10/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Garcia winning 0 times and Ostapenko being victorious 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Garcia winning 1 and Ostapenko winning 4. The last match between Garcia and Ostapenko was at the Adelaide International - Adelaide, 10-01-2024, Second, Hard with Jelena Ostapenko getting the victory 6-4 5-7 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:57:8.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Garcia and Ostapenko have played a deciding set 1 times, with Garcia winning 0 times and Ostapenko 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Garcia winning 0, and Ostapenko 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Garcia has played against opponents with an average rank of 59.96 while Ostapenko has played against players with an average rank of 70.98.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Garcia has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ostapenko has won 64% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Garcia has converted 35.48% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ostapenko has converted 47.31% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Caroline Garcia Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Naomi Osaka
Player
Caroline Garcia
51%
(
41 of
81)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
7
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
0
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Magdalena Frech
Player
Caroline Garcia
62%
(
55 of
89)
1st Serve %
65%
(
58 of
89)
1
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
6
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
7 of
31)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Caroline Garcia
Player
Ena Shibahara
52%
(
44 of
84)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
10
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
4
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
87%
(
39 of
45)
65%
(
26 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
26 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
20 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Renata Zarazua
Player
Caroline Garcia
49%
(
29 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
0
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
7
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaqueline Cristian
Player
Caroline Garcia
62%
(
61 of
99)
1st Serve %
72%
(
78 of
108)
4
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
3
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
52 of
78)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
38 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
108)
104
Total Points Won
103
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Bernarda Pera
Player
Caroline Garcia
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
84)
13
Aces
12
8
Double Faults
3
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
41 of
55)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
27 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
25 of
84)
84
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caroline Garcia
Player
Anna Blinkova
49%
(
34 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
48 of
72)
6
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
1
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
33%
(
12 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
31 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sofia Kenin
Player
Caroline Garcia
81%
(
44 of
54)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
77)
1
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caroline Garcia
Player
Eva Lys
57%
(
62 of
108)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
91)
18
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
8
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
48%
(
22 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
42 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
107
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Jelena Ostapenko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Belinda Bencic
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve %
52%
(
41 of
79)
2
Aces
8
8
Double Faults
10
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
32 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Madison Keys
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
57%
(
54 of
94)
1st Serve %
52%
(
53 of
101)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
44%
(
41 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
51 of
101)
104
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Magdalena Frech
46%
(
44 of
95)
1st Serve %
69%
(
57 of
83)
6
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
1
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
45%
(
23 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
38 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
83)
100
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marie Bouzkova
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve %
44%
(
40 of
90)
5
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
12
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
31 of
40)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
8 of
50)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
47%
(
37 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
51 of
90)
93
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(0) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marina Stakusic
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
58%
(
73 of
125)
1st Serve %
48%
(
57 of
120)
5
Aces
10
17
Double Faults
17
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
40%
(
21 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
22 of
63)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
46%
(
57 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
61 of
120)
129
Total Points Won
116
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naomi Osaka
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
9
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
6
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elina Avanesyan
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
46%
(
21 of
46)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
49%
(
32 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
43 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
2-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Taylor Townsend
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
12 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
55%
(
51 of
92)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
3
Aces
9
12
Double Faults
9
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
41 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
93)
94
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
61 of
94)
1
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
46%
(
26 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
92)
81
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Garcia vs Ostapenko?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Garcia Vs Ostapenko is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Caroline Garcia | Jelena Ostapenko |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/1) | 25% (1/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 30% (3/7) |
| Games Win/Loss | 44% (12/15) | 49% (48/49) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 25% (1/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.54 | 0.44 |
| Aces Total | 7 | 21 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.79 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 38 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 2:6:25 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 51 | 94.25 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (58/83) | 49% (178/365) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (35/58) | 69% (122/178) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 56% (14/25) | 34% (64/187) |
| BPs Won% Total | 33% (2/6) | 42% (22/52) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (28/81) | 46% (153/333) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 25% (1/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 33% (3/1) |
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
