C. M. Alves
To Win
H. Bougouffa
To Win
Carolina Meligeni Alves vs Sada Nahimana Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W W W L W L
Form
W L W W W L W L L LHead-To-Head: Alves 0 - 1 Nahimana
They have played 3 sets in total, with Alves winning 1 and Nahimana winning 2. The last match between Alves and Nahimana was at the Grand Prix De SAR La Princesse Lalla Meryem - Rabat, 18-05-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Sada Nahimana getting the victory 3-6 6-1 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Carolina Meligeni Alves | 0 |
| Sada Nahimana | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Grand Prix De SAR La Princesse Lalla Meryem - Rabat(18-05-2025)
Sada Nahimana
Carolina Meligeni Alves
3
6
6
1
6
4
| Alves | Stats | Nahimana |
|---|---|---|
| 67% (35-17) | YTD Win/Loss | 71% (22-9) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 241 | Ranking | 237 |
| 165 | Highest Rank | 231 |
| 29 | Age | 24 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 8 | Titles | 5 |
| 58% (432-313) | Career Total W/L | 61% (208-134) |
| $130,308 | Career Prize Money | $4,470 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 2 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
- / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kovalik VS Jarry PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
25 Jun 2025 / Q2 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Diallo VS Djere PREDICTION Grass
Mallorca Championships - Mallorca atp
24 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-1 6-4 |
Stats 
Sada Nahimana
Player
Carolina Meligeni Alves
70%
(
52 of
74)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
89)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 11 | Games Won | 15 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:8:33 | Average Match Time | 2:8:33 |
| 70% (62/89) | 1st Serve % | 70% (52/74) |
| 52% (32/62) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (36/52) |
| 44% (12/27) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (8/22) |
| 44% (4/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (6/15) |
| 41% (30/74) | Return Points Win % | 51% (45/89) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Alves vs Nahimana Match Preview :
Certainly! Here's your paraphrased content in bullet form and the editorial prediction.
- In the recent six months, Alves has outperformed Nahimana in second serve points, capturing 39.58% against Nahimana's 36.3%. Does this make Alves a stronger contender? Yes, it indicates a slight edge in serve stability.
- Alves holds a lead in return stats, winning 53.25% of opponents' second serve points, whereas Nahimana trails at 49.83%. Similarly, Alves leads in first serve return points with 36.23% compared to Nahimana's 31.24%.
- Under pressure, Nahimana edges out Alves by saving 48.01% of breakpoints versus Alves' 46.37%. Could Nahimana's ability to handle pressure translate to an advantage? It remains a crucial factor.
- Overall, Nahimana has won a higher percentage of matches over the past year, at 67.65%, against Alves' 60.81%. This indicates a better recent form in match outcomes.
- Both players perform best on clay courts, with Nahimana having a slightly superior win percentage of 63% compared to Alves' 60%.
- At the Challenger/ITF level, Nahimana maintains a superior victory rate of 67.16% over Alves' 60.87%, implying a stronger record in similar competitive environments.
- Nahimana has faced higher-ranked opponents on average (390.59) compared to Alves (417.05), which may have provided tougher competition.
- In deciding sets, Alves has a higher success rate, winning 63% compared to Nahimana's 56%, potentially crucial for match deciders.
- When considering breakpoint opportunities, Nahimana has converted a higher percentage at 40.97% compared to Alves' 39.41%. Can this lead to critical match-turning moments? It certainly might.
Editorial Prediction (May 17, 2025, UTC):
In analyzing the strengths and recent performances of both players, it becomes clear that Alves has demonstrated superior second serve efficacy and return capabilities. These serve as pivotal advantages in crucial match moments.
Concurrently, Nahimana's ability to handle pressure, as evidenced by their breakpoint saving prowess, along with a strong overall match win rate, lends them a formidable competitive edge.
While Alves outshines in deciding sets, Nahimana's conversion of breakpoint opportunities remains a significant determining factor. Although Nahimana's win against higher-ranked opponents suggests resilience, Alves' decisive game approach reflects optimal form under pressure.
Considering the insights, Nahimana appears to have a slight edge due to a consistent positive trend in match wins and breakpoint conversions. Thus, Nahimana is predicted as the probable winner for the upcoming match.
Alves vs Nahimana Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Carolina Meligeni Alves Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jessica Pieri
Player
Carolina Meligeni Alves
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
47%
(
26 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
54
Total Points Won
63
|
1-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carolina Meligeni Alves
Player
Valentini Grammatikopoulou
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
24 of
38)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Laura Samson
Player
Carolina Meligeni Alves
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
87)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
47%
(
35 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
87)
83
Total Points Won
78
|
2-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Carolina Meligeni Alves
Player
Aurora Zantedeschi
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
51%
(
20 of
39)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carolina Meligeni Alves
Player
Gabriela Lee
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carolina Meligeni Alves
Player
Laura Svatikova
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
50%
(
11 of
22)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
45%
(
15 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
51
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carolina Meligeni Alves
Player
Jana Kovackova
62%
(
47 of
76)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
Player
Carolina Meligeni Alves
64%
(
62 of
97)
1st Serve %
70%
(
56 of
80)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
42 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
80)
97
Total Points Won
80
|
5-7 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Sada Nahimana Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mathilde Lollia
Player
Sada Nahimana
64%
(
65 of
102)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
85)
0
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
5
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
45%
(
46 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
98
|
1-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alessandra Mazzola
Player
Sada Nahimana
86%
(
49 of
57)
1st Serve %
79%
(
44 of
56)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
69
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Sada Nahimana
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
62
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Pia Lovric
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
79%
(
34 of
43)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
44%
(
21 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
51
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Sada Nahimana
64%
(
58 of
91)
1st Serve %
63%
(
53 of
84)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Aya El Aouni
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
76%
(
42 of
55)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Carolina Meligeni Alves
70%
(
52 of
74)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
89)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sada Nahimana
Player
Luca Udvardy
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
53%
(
21 of
40)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (432/313) | Win/Loss | 61% (208/134) |
| 57% (959/733) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (448/316) |
| 53% (8108/7162) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (3688/3188) |
| 45% (41/51) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (42/27) |
| 60% (389/258) | Clay Win/Loss | 63% (155/93) |
| 50% (2/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 44% (11/14) |
| 0% (0/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.18 |
| 492 | Aces Total | 612 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 1380 | Total Double Faults | 908 |
| 1:24:24 | Average Match Time | 1:39:48 |
| 521.94 | Average Opponent Rank | 477.99 |
| 69% (27469/39834) | 1st Serve % | 67% (14651/21763) |
| 58% (16021/27469) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (8826/14651) |
| 46% (5684/12365) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (3285/7113) |
| 50% (2762/5481) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (1422/2887) |
| 48% (19400/40320) | Return Points Win % | 47% (10330/21933) |
| 30% (3/7) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 70% (7/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 38% (9/15) | Main Tour W/L | 38% (3/5) |
| 55% (257/209) | Challenger W/L | 60% (166/112) |
| 67% (155/78) | Futures W/L | 70% (39/17) |
| 58% (423/734) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (205/339) |
| 75% (3/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (72/137) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (35/65) |
| 51% (104/203) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (48/84) |
| 88% (423/373) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (202/182) |
| 12% (423/50) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (202/20) |
| 18% (322/57) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (140/25) |
Alves vs. Nahimana Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
