Carolina Kuhl vs Clara Vlasselaer Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L L W L W L L
Form
W L W L W W L L L LHead-to-head: Kuhl 0 - 2 Vlasselaer
They have played 5 sets in total, with Kuhl winning 1 and Vlasselaer winning 4. The last match between Kuhl and Vlasselaer was at the W35 Manchester, 17-02-2025, Q3, I.hard with Clara Vlasselaer getting the victory 6-3 6-0.
W35 Manchester(17-02-2025)
6
3
6
0
29% (2-5)
YTD Win/Loss
46% (6-7)
0
Head-to-Head
2
434
Ranking
448
391
Highest Rank
398
19
Age
24
-
Plays
-
3
Titles
0
56% (79-61)
Career Total W/L
51% (163-156)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
0
Hard H2H
1
0
Clay H2H
0
0
Indoor H2H
1
0
Grass H2H
0
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Joint VS Masarova PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
17 Mar 2025 / Q3
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Tomova VS McNally PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Kuhl VS Vlasselaer H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-0 |
Stats 
Clara Vlasselaer
Player
Carolina Kuhl
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
||||
| 3-6 6-4 6-3 |
Stats
Clara Vlasselaer
Player
Carolina Kuhl
46%
(
41 of
90)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
8
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
9
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
39%
(
19 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
48%
(
43 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
91)
90
Total Points Won
91
|
||||
Kuhl VS Vlasselaer H2H Stats
Stats
0
H2H Matches
2
1
Sets Won
4
16
Games Won
27
5
Aces (Total)
16
10
Total Double Faults
7
1:58:37
Average Match Time
1:58:37
66% (93/141)
1st Serve %
55% (75/137)
57% (53/93)
1st Serve Win %
71% (53/75)
35% (17/48)
2nd Serve Win %
42% (26/62)
54% (7/13)
Break Points Won % (Total)
48% (12/25)
42% (58/137)
Return Points Win %
50% (71/141)
0% (0/2)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
100% (2/2)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Deciding Set Win %
100% (1/1)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (1/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
100% (1/1)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Carolina Kuhl vs Clara Vlasselaer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Carolina Kuhl 0 - 2 Clara Vlasselaer
- Analyzing Second Serve Performance: Recent form reveals that in the past six months, Kuhl has exhibited an impressive second serve performance, securing victory in 44.53% of points played. In contrast, Vlasselaer has displayed a slightly lower success rate, winning 39.96% of points. It is worthwhile to note that there exists a noteworthy correlation between this statistical measure and the accuracy of match predictions.
- Evaluating Return Game Stats: A thorough examination of return game statistics emphasizes the prowess of Kuhl in recent form. Within the last six months, Kuhl has successfully conquered 52.77% of their opponents' second serve points. In contrast, Vlasselaer has exhibited a slightly lower success rate, winning 57.55% of such points. Similarly, in terms of first serve returns, Kuhl has achieved a 39.86% success rate, whereas Vlasselaer has managed a slightly lower rate of 35.45%. These statistical figures possess a significant correlation in determining the favored contender in the forthcoming clash between the two.
- Examining Performance Under Pressure: A quantitative analysis of their recent form reveals that Kuhl has expertly saved 60.19% of breakpoints encountered. On the other hand, Vlasselaer has demonstrated a slightly lower success rate of 57.35%. This invaluable statistic holds considerable utility in making informed predictions regarding in-game betting opportunities.
- Comprehensive Performance Overview: Over the course of the past year, Kuhl has emerged victorious in 54.1% of their matches, with a win-loss record of 33/28. In comparison, Vlasselaer has achieved a success rate of 49.23%, boasting a win-loss record of 32/33. Taking these figures into account, we can construct a holistic head-to-head prediction overview.
- Optimal Surface Preference: When evaluating the players' career performance on different surfaces, it becomes evident that Kuhl excels on hard courts, boasting a remarkable 61% win rate (W/L 14/9). Conversely, their performance on indoor hard courts dips slightly, with a win rate of 52% (W/L 16/15). In contrast, Vlasselaer emerges as more formidable on indoor hard courts, attaining a 55% career win rate (W/L 30/25). However, their performance on clay courts proves less adept, with a win rate of 42% (W/L 23/32).
- Player Level Considerations: Within the past year, Kuhl has predominantly participated in Challengers/ITF tournaments exceeding $10,000, triumphing in 51.02% of matches (W/L 25/24). Conversely, Vlasselaer has mostly competed in similar Challengers/ITF tournaments, securing victory in 47.46% of matches (W/L 28/31). It is crucial to contextualize these statistics relative to the level of the events they have participated in when assessing their likelihood of emerging as the favorite.
- Prior Head-to-Head Encounters: The two players have crossed paths once in the past, resulting in Kuhl failing to secure a victory while Vlasselaer emerged triumphant. Over the course of their encounters, three sets were played, with Kuhl emerging victorious in one instance, while Vlasselaer secured victory in two sets. Most recently, at the W15 Monastir on 02-03-2022, Clara Vlasselaer achieved a hard-fought triumph with a final score of 3-6, 6-4, 6-3.
- Duration of Head-to-Head Matches: Historical matches between these competitors have exhibited an average duration of 2 hours, 29 minutes, and 0 seconds, highlighting the intensity of their encounters.
- Predicting the Deciding Set Outcome: Notably, Kuhl and Vlasselaer have engaged in one deciding set, resulting in Vlasselaer emerging victorious on the singular occasion. This statistical insight proves invaluable in foreseeing the outcome if the upcoming match extends to its full duration.
- Head-to-Head in Extreme Pressure Situations: It is illuminating to observe that the two competitors have not encountered any tiebreak situations in their previous head-to-head matches. Both Kuhl and Vlasselaer have yet to claim victory in a tiebreak against one another.
- Analyzing Opponent Quality: Revealing the caliber of their opponents, Kuhl has contested matches against players with an average ranking of 399.64 over the past twelve months. In a similar timeframe, Vlasselaer has faced opponents with an average ranking of 485. These figures provide valuable context when assessing their performance levels.
- Performance in Deciding Sets against All Players: Pertaining to live predictions and betting prospects, it is worth noting that Kuhl has emerged victorious in 42% of deciding sets played over the past twelve months. In contrast, Vlasselaer has achieved an impressive win rate of 65% in all matches played on the tour. These statistics offer crucial insights for live betting enthusiasts seeking to make informed decisions.
- Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: While analyzing past player performances offers valuable insights into predicting tennis matches, it is equally imperative to scrutinize current event statistics to gauge the players' current form. Please refer to the relevant section below (if the players have already competed in the ongoing event). Additionally, certain players exhibit enhanced performances in specific events, necessitating a careful consideration of this aspect when predicting the outcome.
- Break Point Conversion Rates: Recent statistical data reveals that Kuhl has successfully converted 49.69% of break point opportunities, while Vlasselaer has accomplished a slightly lower conversion rate of 49.33% when presented with chances to break their opponents' serves. This telling statistic holds significant value for in-game live betting tips, particularly when either player finds themselves with a break point opportunity.
- If your interest lies in models that accurately predict tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent starting point. (Warning: Intended for statistics enthusiasts only)
Carolina Kuhl Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ella Mcdonald
Player
Carolina Kuhl
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
14 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
49
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Clara Vlasselaer
Player
Carolina Kuhl
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Carolina Kuhl
Player
Eva Guerrero Alvarez
75%
(
54 of
72)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
46%
(
33 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 2-6 13-11 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daria Snigur
Player
Carolina Kuhl
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
76%
(
39 of
51)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carolina Kuhl
Player
Arlinda Rushiti
79%
(
59 of
75)
1st Serve %
54%
(
53 of
99)
4
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
7
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
31 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
49 of
99)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlota Martinez Cirez
Player
Carolina Kuhl
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
72%
(
52 of
72)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Ovcharenko
Player
Carolina Kuhl
59%
(
57 of
96)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
7
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
7
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
31 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
101
Total Points Won
76
|
6-1 6-7(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Viktoria Hruncakova
Player
Carolina Kuhl
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
52%
(
44 of
85)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carolina Kuhl
Player
Camilla Gennaro
47%
(
27 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
12
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
71
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aneta Laboutkova
Player
Carolina Kuhl
66%
(
83 of
126)
1st Serve %
70%
(
94 of
135)
7
Aces
11
6
Double Faults
6
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
65 of
94)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
40%
(
50 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
55 of
135)
131
Total Points Won
130
|
7-6(7) 6-7(2) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Clara Vlasselaer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Daria Frayman
Player
Clara Vlasselaer
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zeel Desai
Player
Clara Vlasselaer
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ekaterina Reyngold
Player
Clara Vlasselaer
33%
(
8 of
24)
1st Serve %
37%
(
13 of
35)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
88%
(
7 of
8)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
7 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
34
Total Points Won
25
|
6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joanna Garland
Player
Clara Vlasselaer
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
94%
(
32 of
34)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Clara Vlasselaer
Player
Carolina Kuhl
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Clara Vlasselaer
Player
Ariana Arseneault
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
46%
(
19 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kamilla Bartone
Player
Clara Vlasselaer
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve %
73%
(
47 of
64)
13
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
88%
(
43 of
49)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
24 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
21 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Clara Vlasselaer
Player
Holly Hutchinson
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
25 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna Sinclair Rogers
Player
Clara Vlasselaer
75%
(
85 of
114)
1st Serve %
59%
(
56 of
95)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
42 of
56)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
39%
(
45 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
95)
105
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Clara Vlasselaer
Player
Carlota Martinez Cirez
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve %
54%
(
46 of
85)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
56% (79/61)
Win/Loss
51% (163/156)
55% (177/145)
Sets Win/Loss
52% (376/350)
52% (1500/1383)
Games Win/Loss
51% (3438/3292)
61% (14/9)
Hard Win/Loss
53% (109/98)
60% (45/30)
Clay Win/Loss
42% (23/32)
48% (20/22)
Indoor Hard W/L
54% (31/26)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.18
Aces Per Game
0.24
247
Aces Total
770
0.31
Double Faults Per Game
0.42
433
Total Double Faults
1392
1:45:18
Average Match Time
1:30:19
433.94
Average Opponent Rank
452.71
61% (5641/9222)
1st Serve %
55% (9716/17632)
60% (3399/5641)
1st Serve Win %
66% (6370/9716)
45% (1623/3581)
2nd Serve Win %
43% (3400/7917)
50% (612/1217)
Break Points Won % (Total)
47% (955/2053)
48% (4434/9324)
Return Points Win %
44% (7646/17213)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
49% (45/47)
Challenger W/L
47% (75/84)
72% (34/13)
Futures W/L
55% (88/72)
57% (78/138)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
51% (161/314)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/2)
58% (14/24)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
55% (36/66)
55% (24/44)
Deciding Set Win %
46% (41/90)
82% (79/65)
1st Set Won, Won Match
82% (177/145)
18% (79/14)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
18% (177/31)
23% (61/14)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
13% (142/18)
See recent tennis photos of Kuhl and Vlasselaer
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
