Carolina Bohrer Martins vs Victoria Emma Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Martins vs Emma analysis and find out who is favored!
Carolina Bohrer Martins vs Victoria Emma Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Martins has won 34.04% of points on his second serve, while Emma has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Martins, in recent form, has won 49.21% of his opponent's second serve points, while Emma has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.01% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Martins has saved 52.94% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Emma has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Martins has won 25% of matches played (W/L 7/ 21), with Emma winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Martins has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 26% (W/L 7/ 20). Emma has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 16/ 14), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 40% (W/L 12/ 18).
- Player level: In the last year, Martins has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 25% of matches (W/L 5/ 15), where as Emma has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Martins winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Martins winning 2 and Emma winning 0. The last match between Martins and Emma was at the W25 Sumter, 14-06-2022, Q3, Hard with Carolina Bohrer Martins getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:7:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Martins and Emma have played a deciding set 0 times, with Martins winning 0 times and Emma 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Martins winning 1, and Emma 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Martins has played against opponents with an average rank of 268.68 while Emma has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Martins has won 25% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Emma has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Martins has converted 53.19% of breakpoint opportunities, and Emma has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Martins 1 - 0 Emma
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
887
Rank
862
High
16
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
899
Rank
771
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
30% (14-32)
Career Total W/L
47% (28-32)
13% (1-7)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Carolina Bohrer Martins | Victoria Emma |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 14 | 11 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 9 | 15 |
Avg Match Time | 2:7:0 | 2:7:0 |
1st Serve % | 60% (50/83) | 52% (41/79) |
1st Serve Win% | 54% (27/50) | 59% (24/41) |
2nd Serve Win% | 45% (15/33) | 24% (9/38) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 58% (7/12) | 67% (6/9) |
Return Points W% | 58% (46/79) | 49% (41/83) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 7-6(4) |
Carolina Bohrer Martins
Player
Victoria Emma
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
52%
(
41 of
79)
2
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
15
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
9 of
38)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
49%
(
41 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
46 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Carolina Bohrer Martins | Victoria Emma |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 13% (1/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 22% (4/14) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 42% (78/107) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 13% (1/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.09 | 0 |
Aces Total | 8 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.66 | 0 |
DFs Total | 59 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:9:15 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 206.75 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 53% (201/381) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 57% (114/201) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 36% (65/180) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 59% (20/34) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 44% (163/374) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 13% (1/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (6/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Carolina Bohrer Martins Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Martina Okalova
Player
Carolina Bohrer Martins
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
9
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Valeriya Strakhova
Player
Carolina Bohrer Martins
78%
(
92 of
118)
1st Serve %
52%
(
50 of
97)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
17
59%
(
54 of
92)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
15 of
47)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
44%
(
52 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
52 of
97)
118
Total Points Won
97
|
6-7(5) 6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
QF |
Juliana Rodriguez
Player
Carolina Bohrer Martins
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve %
53%
(
47 of
89)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
9
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
47%
(
34 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
89)
79
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(3) 3-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Oana Gavrila
Player
Carolina Bohrer Martins
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
40%
(
25 of
62)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
14
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jazmin Ortenzi
Player
Carolina Bohrer Martins
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
10
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
48%
(
34 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Matilde Jorge
Player
Carolina Bohrer Martins
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
9
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Victoria Emma Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Carolina Bohrer Martins
Player
Victoria Emma
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
52%
(
41 of
79)
2
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
15
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
9 of
38)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
49%
(
41 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
46 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Jenna Defalco
Player
Victoria Emma
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
16
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 4-6 6-4 10-8 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Olivia Tjandramulia
Player
Victoria Emma
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
40%
(
17 of
42)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
21
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
2 of
25)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
22 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Alexa Graham
Player
Victoria Emma
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
15
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
5 of
26)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H |
view more