Carole Monnet vs Leonie Kung Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

In anticipation of an exciting tennis match, an analytical look into the players’ statistics and recent performances provides a comprehensive overview that aids in predicting the outcome. When evaluating second serve performance over the last six months, Monnet has secured 41.65% of points during her second serve. Meanwhile, Kung has demonstrated a slightly better performance, with a win rate of 44.24%. Historically, this statistic has shown a strong correlation with match prediction accuracy, offering insights into their prospects.

Examining return game statistics reveals nuanced differences in their playing styles. Monnet, in her recent form, has won 49.72% of points on her opponent's second serve. In contrast, Kung has achieved a return win rate of 46.64% under the same conditions. Similar patterns emerge with first serve returns, where Monnet leads marginally with 36.07%, over Kung's 33.51%. These figures offer valuable insight into who might have the upper hand in their head-to-head match-up.

Assessing player performance under pressure, Monnet has managed to save 43.65% of breakpoints, while Kung has exhibited a somewhat higher breakpoint save rate at 46.06%. Such statistics are crucial for in-game betting predictions, especially in tense match situations.

Over the past year, Monnet has achieved a win rate of 45.45% in her matches, with a record of 25 wins and 30 losses. In comparison, Kung has secured more victories, winning 56.41% of her matches, translating to a 44/34 win-loss record. This broader performance overview highlights Kung's recent superiority on the court.

When considering surface preferences, Monnet’s optimal performance occurs on hard courts, where she boasts a career win percentage of 64%. Conversely, Kung also favors hard courts with a win percentage of 60%. Notably, Monnet’s least favorable surface is indoor hard courts at 40%, while Kung struggles on grass, with a balanced 50% win rate.

Exploring player level, Monnet has primarily competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments above $10K, where she has won 43.48% of her matches. On the other hand, Kung has had more success, with a win rate of 58.11% in the same tournament category. This statistic, viewed in conjunction with the quality of opponents — Monnet faced players ranked on average at 256.35, whereas Kung's opponents had an average rank of 172.9 — emphasizes Kung's experience and potential advantage in higher-level matchups.

In scenarios involving deciding sets, Monnet exhibits a 40% success rate over the past 12 months, whereas Kung leads significantly with a 56% win rate in similar situations. Such performance differences could be pivotal if the match extends to a deciding set.

Break point conversion rates reflect closely matched abilities, with Monnet converting 37.89% of opportunities and Kung slightly behind at 36.4%. This figure is particularly valuable for live betting tips, influencing judgments during critical match moments.

Ultimately, when synthesizing these data points, Kung appears to hold a slight edge over Monnet, suggesting she may be the favored contender to emerge victorious in this matchup, based on recent form and comparative statistics.