Carol Young Suh Lee vs Gaia Squarcialupi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan

Form
W W W W W L W L W L
Form
L W W L W W L W W LHead-to-head: Lee 1 - 0 Squarcialupi
They have played 2 sets in total, with Lee winning 2 and Squarcialupi winning 0. The last match between Lee and Squarcialupi was at the W15 Sharm ElSheikh, 14-02-2025, Quarterfinals, Hard with Carol Young Suh Lee getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
W15 Sharm ElSheikh(14-02-2025)
6
2
6
2
75% (15-5)
YTD Win/Loss
60% (6-4)
1
Head-to-Head
0
890
Ranking
700
840
Highest Rank
694
23
Age
27
-
Plays
-
0
Titles
1
67% (34-17)
Career Total W/L
45% (113-136)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
1
Hard H2H
0
0
Clay H2H
0
0
Indoor H2H
0
0
Grass H2H
0
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Joint VS Errani PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
16 Mar 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Rune VS Draper PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
17 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Lee VS Squarcialupi H2H Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-2 |
![]() ![]()
Carol Young Suh Lee
Player
Gaia Squarcialupi
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
Lee VS Squarcialupi H2H Stats
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
0
12
Games Won
4
4
Aces (Total)
2
0
Total Double Faults
3
1:8:33
Average Match Time
1:8:33
53% (24/45)
1st Serve %
55% (27/49)
83% (20/24)
1st Serve Win %
52% (14/27)
67% (14/21)
2nd Serve Win %
45% (10/22)
40% (4/10)
Break Points Won % (Total)
0% (0/0)
51% (25/49)
Return Points Win %
24% (11/45)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Carol Young Suh Lee vs Gaia Squarcialupi Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Carol Young Suh Lee 1 - 0 Gaia Squarcialupi
Rendimiento del segundo servicio en el pasado reciente: Durante los Ăºltimos seis meses, el jugador Lee ha demostrado un notable desempeño al ganar el 52.1% de los puntos con su segundo servicio, mientras que su oponente, Squarcialupi, ha obtenido un 43.01% de acierto en esta categorĂa. Cabe destacar que existe una alta correlaciĂ³n entre estos datos y la precisiĂ³n en la predicciĂ³n de los resultados de los partidos.
EstadĂsticas recientes del juego de devoluciĂ³n: Analizando las estadĂsticas de devoluciĂ³n, se revela que en los Ăºltimos encuentros, Lee ha ganado el 54.89% de los puntos en el segundo servicio de su adversario, mientras que Squarcialupi ha obtenido un 56.8% de efectividad en esta misma Ă¡rea de juego. Asimismo, en cuanto a las devoluciones del primer servicio, los porcentajes correspondientes son del 42.02% y 39.93%, respectivamente. Estos datos poseen una considerable influencia al momento de determinar quiĂ©n es el favorito en este cara a cara.
Un anĂ¡lisis riguroso bajo presiĂ³n: Lee ha demostrado una notable capacidad para salvar el 65.12% de los puntos de quiebre durante su trayectoria reciente, mientras que Squarcialupi ha logrado rescatar el 48.77% en esta categorĂa. Esta estadĂstica resulta fundamental para generar estimaciones de apuestas durante el transcurso del partido.
Resumen de rendimiento general: Si nos enfocamos en el Ăºltimo año, es evidente que Lee ha conseguido triunfar en el 73.33% de los partidos disputados, registrando un rĂ©cord de 22 victorias y 8 derrotas (G/P 22/8). Por su parte, Squarcialupi ha obtenido un 50% de Ă©xito en esta misma etapa, con un total de 23 victorias y 23 derrotas (G/P 23/23). Estos datos ofrecen una visiĂ³n completa y precisa de las predicciones cara a cara entre ambos jugadores.
Superficies preferidas: Al analizar las superficies en las que cada jugador ha obtenido sus mejores resultados, resulta evidente que Lee ha dominado en la cancha dura (Hard), alcanzando un 71% de victorias (G/P 27/11), mientras que su desempeño en la arcilla (Clay) ha sido menos favorable, sin lograr ni una sola victoria (G/P 0/1). Por otro lado, Squarcialupi ha alcanzado su mejor rendimiento en la arcilla (Clay), con un 48% de victorias (G/P 97/105), mientras que en la superficie dura (Hard) ha obtenido un 29% de éxito (G/P 11/27).
Nivel de los jugadores: Durante el Ăºltimo año, Lee ha disputado la mayorĂa de sus partidos en torneos del tipo Futures/Satellites/ITF, con un valor de $10K, consiguiendo un 74.07% de victorias (G/P 20/7). Por su parte, Squarcialupi ha jugado una cantidad similar de partidos bajo las mismas condiciones, obteniendo un 50% de triunfos (G/P 15/15). Al comparar las estadĂsticas entre ambos jugadores para predecir quiĂ©n es el favorito, es importante tener en cuenta el nivel del evento en el que han estado compitiendo.
EstadĂsticas del oponente: En los Ăºltimos 12 meses, Lee ha enfrentado a oponentes con un ranking promedio de 127.27, mientras que Squarcialupi ha jugado contra jugadores cuyo ranking promedio es de 182.33. Estos datos son sumamente reveladores al momento de evaluar el rendimiento de cada jugador frente a competidores de distintas categorĂas.
Rendimiento en sets decisivos: Para aquellos interesados en las predicciones en vivo y las apuestas, cabe destacar que, durante los Ăºltimos 12 meses, Lee ha ganado un 67% de los sets decisivos, mientras que Squarcialupi solo ha obtenido un 17% de Ă©xito en todos los partidos disputados en el circuito. Estos porcentajes adquieren un rol trascendental en el transcurso de un partido que llegue a un set decisivo.
EstadĂsticas actuales del evento H2H: Si bien el rendimiento pasado de los jugadores resulta de gran utilidad para predecir los resultados de los partidos de tenis, tambiĂ©n debemos considerar las estadĂsticas actuales del evento en curso para determinar quĂ© jugador se encuentra en mejor forma. Si ambos jugadores han disputado un partido en el evento actual, es fundamental consultar la secciĂ³n a continuaciĂ³n (ver estadĂsticas actuales del evento). AdemĂ¡s, es importante tener en cuenta que algunos jugadores suelen rendir mejor en determinados eventos, lo cual debe tenerse en cuenta al realizar las predicciones.
ConversiĂ³n de puntos de quiebre: Durante su trayectoria reciente, Lee ha logrado convertir el 49.4% de las oportunidades de quiebre que ha tenido, mientras que Squarcialupi ha aprovechado el 50% de estas situaciones para romper el servicio de sus oponentes. Esta estadĂstica resulta sumamente reveladora al momento de realizar apuestas durante el partido, especialmente cuando alguno de los jugadores cuenta con una oportunidad de quiebre.
Si deseas obtener mĂ¡s informaciĂ³n acerca de modelos de predicciones en el tenis, este artĂculo puede ser un buen punto de partida (Advertencia: EstadĂsticas solo para conocedores).
Carol Young Suh Lee Recent Matches Played
Before:
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Elena Milovanovic
Player
Carol Young Suh Lee
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Carol Young Suh Lee
Player
Vicky Van De Peer
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Marie Vogt
Player
Carol Young Suh Lee
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 5-7 10-7 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Carolyn Ansari
Player
Carol Young Suh Lee
77%
(
78 of
101)
1st Serve %
57%
(
60 of
106)
0
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
39 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
106)
106
Total Points Won
101
|
7-5 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Carol Young Suh Lee
Player
Gaia Squarcialupi
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Carol Young Suh Lee
Player
Katarina Kuzmova
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
59 of
104)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
104)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Carol Young Suh Lee
Player
Anastasia Kovaleva
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Carol Young Suh Lee
Player
Yasmin Ezzat
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
47 of
70)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Gaia Squarcialupi Recent Matches Played
Before:
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Laura Mair
Player
Gaia Squarcialupi
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Gaia Squarcialupi
Player
Eliz Maloney
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
60 of
87)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
87)
86
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Gaia Squarcialupi
Player
Viktoria Veleva
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
55%
(
21 of
38)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
6%
(
1 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
57
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Tamara Kostic
Player
Gaia Squarcialupi
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
58)
0
Aces
0
11
Double Faults
5
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
31%
(
9 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
45%
(
37 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Gaia Squarcialupi
Player
Kathleen Kanev
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
83%
(
50 of
60)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Gaia Squarcialupi
Player
Laura Rahnel
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Carol Young Suh Lee
Player
Gaia Squarcialupi
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Gaia Squarcialupi
Player
Boyoung Jeong
58%
(
45 of
77)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Gaia Squarcialupi
Player
Joody Elkady
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
45%
(
40 of
88)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
8
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
77
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Daria Yesypchuk
Player
Gaia Squarcialupi
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
38 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H |
view more

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
67% (34/17)
Win/Loss
45% (113/136)
65% (71/39)
Sets Win/Loss
48% (272/299)
58% (578/427)
Games Win/Loss
48% (2489/2668)
69% (29/13)
Hard Win/Loss
31% (13/29)
0% (0/1)
Clay Win/Loss
48% (99/106)
63% (5/3)
Indoor Hard W/L
50% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.23
Aces Per Game
0.1
110
Aces Total
251
0.14
Double Faults Per Game
0.24
67
Total Double Faults
600
1:20:12
Average Match Time
1:1:13
463.61
Average Opponent Rank
378.04
62% (1509/2432)
1st Serve %
60% (6533/10836)
65% (984/1509)
1st Serve Win %
59% (3840/6533)
49% (453/923)
2nd Serve Win %
43% (1855/4303)
47% (143/302)
Break Points Won % (Total)
49% (639/1317)
46% (1115/2431)
Return Points Win %
45% (4909/10843)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
67% (10/5)
Challenger W/L
49% (17/18)
69% (24/11)
Futures W/L
45% (96/118)
67% (34/51)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
45% (111/246)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
50% (4/8)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
49% (21/43)
63% (5/8)
Deciding Set Win %
37% (28/76)
97% (32/31)
1st Set Won, Won Match
80% (128/103)
3% (32/1)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
20% (128/25)
16% (19/3)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
8% (121/10)
See recent tennis photos of Lee and Squarcialupi
Other Predictions
- Loading news...