C. M. Cirez
To Win
A. Kovackova
To Win
Carlota Martinez Cirez vs Julie Belgraver Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L W L L L L L
Form
L L W W L L W W L LHead-to-head: Cirez 0 - 1 Belgraver
They have played 2 sets in total, with Cirez winning 0 and Belgraver winning 2. The last match between Cirez and Belgraver was at the W35 Manchester, 18-02-2025, First, I.hard with Julie Belgraver getting the victory 6-1 6-0.
W35 Manchester(18-02-2025)
Upcoming Match
- / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Pavlyuchenkova VS Linette PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Tomova VS McNally PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-0 |
Stats 
Julie Belgraver
Player
Carlota Martinez Cirez
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve %
66%
(
21 of
32)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
48
Total Points Won
23
|
||||
Stats
0
H2H Matches
1
0
Sets Won
2
1
Games Won
12
0
Aces (Total)
2
4
Total Double Faults
0
0:39:27
Average Match Time
0:39:27
66% (21/32)
1st Serve %
72% (28/39)
38% (8/21)
1st Serve Win %
71% (20/28)
27% (3/11)
2nd Serve Win %
64% (7/11)
0% (0/0)
Break Points Won % (Total)
67% (4/6)
31% (12/39)
Return Points Win %
66% (21/32)
0% (0/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (1/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (0/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Carlota Martinez Cirez vs Julie Belgraver Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Carlota Martinez Cirez 0 - 1 Julie Belgraver
According to recent statistics, Cirez has achieved a remarkable 46.98% success rate in winning points on their second serve within the last six months. On the other hand, Belgraver has secured 42.38% of points on their second serve during the same timeframe. This particular statistic holds substantial significance when it comes to predicting the outcome of matches.
Analysis of return game statistics also sheds light on the performance of Cirez and Belgraver. In recent form, Cirez has won an impressive 59.47% of their opponents' second serve points, while Belgraver has managed to secure 53.8%. Furthermore, the numbers for first serve returns stand at 47.84% and 39.67% respectively. These statistics play a crucial role in determining the favorite in this highly anticipated head-to-head match-up.
Examining how players handle pressure situations is also crucial. Cirez has proven to be adept at saving 51.84% of breakpoints in recent matches, whereas Belgraver has an equally commendable record of saving 53.82%. This statistic is valuable for making predictions during in-game betting.
Looking back over the span of a year, Cirez boasts an impressive overall win rate of 63.64% in the matches they have played (winning 56 out of 88). Meanwhile, Belgraver's win rate stands at 60.94% (winning 39 out of 64). These figures provide a comprehensive overview of the head-to-head prediction.
Considering surface statistics, Cirez has excelled on clay courts, winning an impressive 63% of matches (203 out of 324). Conversely, their performance on indoor hard courts has been less remarkable, with only a 33% win rate (1 out of 3). Belgraver, on the other hand, has achieved their highest career win rate on hard courts, winning 63% of matches (69 out of 109). However, their performance on clay courts has been slightly inferior, with a win rate of 49% (43 out of 88).
An examination of player level reveals that in the past year, Cirez has primarily competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments with a prize money greater than $10,000. During this period, they have achieved a commendable 63.95% win rate (55 out of 86). Similarly, Belgraver has mostly played in Challengers/ITF tournaments with the same prize money range, boasting a 60% win rate (30 out of 50). When predicting the favorite, it is important to consider the level of competition each player has been exposed to.
When it comes to opponent quality, Cirez has faced players with an average ranking of 442.08 over the past year. In contrast, Belgraver has encountered opponents with an average ranking of 415.69.
In matches that go into a deciding set, Cirez has shown an impressive record of winning 57% of such sets in the past 12 months. On the other hand, Belgraver has demonstrated an even higher success rate, winning 78% of deciding sets in all matches played on the professional tour.
While historical player performance provides valuable insights for predicting the outcome of a tennis match, it is equally important to consider their current performance in the ongoing event. To assess the form of the players, it is essential to refer to the statistics from the current event (if they have already played a match). Additionally, it should be noted that certain players tend to excel in specific events, and these factors must be taken into account when making predictions.
Breakpoint conversion is another crucial aspect to consider. Cirez has successfully converted 52.67% of breakpoint opportunities, while Belgraver has achieved a conversion rate of 50.7% in breaking their opponents' serves. This statistic proves to be highly informative for in-game live betting tips when either player is presented with a breakpoint opportunity.
For those interested in models that predict tennis matches, the following article serves as an excellent starting point. However, it should be noted that its content is more suitable for statistics enthusiasts.
Carlota Martinez Cirez Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sahaja Yamalapalli
Player
Carlota Martinez Cirez
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
46%
(
18 of
39)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
48%
(
32 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Akanksha Dileep Nitture
Player
Carlota Martinez Cirez
55%
(
47 of
86)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
93)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
13
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
43%
(
37 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
90
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julie Belgraver
Player
Carlota Martinez Cirez
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve %
66%
(
21 of
32)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
48
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martina Colmegna
Player
Carlota Martinez Cirez
79%
(
65 of
82)
1st Serve %
75%
(
65 of
87)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
48%
(
39 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
87)
82
Total Points Won
87
|
6-2 0-6 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Clara Vlasselaer
Player
Carlota Martinez Cirez
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve %
54%
(
46 of
85)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlota Martinez Cirez
Player
Carolina Kuhl
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
72%
(
52 of
72)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yanina Wickmayer
Player
Carlota Martinez Cirez
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
82)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
7
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
44 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Olivia Lincer
Player
Carlota Martinez Cirez
64%
(
68 of
106)
1st Serve %
60%
(
70 of
116)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
7
49%
(
33 of
68)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
53%
(
56 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
62 of
116)
112
Total Points Won
110
|
7-6(9) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carlota Martinez Cirez
Player
Ana Sofia Sanchez
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Carlota Martinez Cirez
Player
Victoria Rodriguez
72%
(
72 of
100)
1st Serve %
79%
(
70 of
89)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
105
Total Points Won
84
|
6-7(7) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Julie Belgraver Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Nikola Bartunkova
Player
Julie Belgraver
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
51%
(
29 of
57)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sofia Costoulas
Player
Julie Belgraver
59%
(
48 of
82)
1st Serve %
48%
(
43 of
90)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
6
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
90)
88
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julie Belgraver
Player
Anastasia Kulikova
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
78)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
9
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julie Belgraver
Player
Jenny Lim
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucrezia Stefanini
Player
Julie Belgraver
67%
(
61 of
91)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
42 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
79
Total Points Won
74
|
1-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jia-Jing Lu
Player
Julie Belgraver
51%
(
29 of
57)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julie Belgraver
Player
Harmony Tan
63%
(
78 of
123)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
98)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
44 of
64)
60%
(
27 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
35%
(
43 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
38 of
98)
118
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(3) 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julie Belgraver
Player
Carlota Martinez Cirez
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve %
66%
(
21 of
32)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
48
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stacey Fung
Player
Julie Belgraver
67%
(
65 of
97)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
91)
4
Aces
14
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
38 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
91)
92
Total Points Won
96
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jessica Pieri
Player
Julie Belgraver
88%
(
45 of
51)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
0%
(
0 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
47%
(
24 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
65
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
61% (219/139)
Win/Loss
56% (138/110)
60% (479/325)
Sets Win/Loss
54% (302/260)
54% (3878/3272)
Games Win/Loss
52% (2621/2449)
50% (14/14)
Hard Win/Loss
63% (69/40)
63% (203/121)
Clay Win/Loss
49% (43/45)
33% (2/4)
Indoor Hard W/L
51% (26/25)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.04
Aces Per Game
0.29
138
Aces Total
722
0.32
Double Faults Per Game
0.33
1101
Total Double Faults
817
1:40:42
Average Match Time
1:33:38
470.61
Average Opponent Rank
454.18
65% (13740/21110)
1st Serve %
55% (8544/15443)
58% (7965/13740)
1st Serve Win %
65% (5537/8544)
44% (3232/7370)
2nd Serve Win %
46% (3144/6899)
53% (1611/3037)
Break Points Won % (Total)
49% (887/1802)
50% (10546/21191)
Return Points Win %
45% (6831/15207)
0% (0/2)
Slam W/L
0% (0/1)
20% (1/4)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
60% (155/103)
Challenger W/L
52% (69/64)
68% (63/30)
Futures W/L
61% (69/45)
61% (217/354)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
56% (136/242)
0% (0/1)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
55% (26/47)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
44% (16/36)
54% (49/90)
Deciding Set Win %
61% (44/72)
89% (212/188)
1st Set Won, Won Match
87% (136/118)
11% (212/24)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
13% (136/18)
21% (146/31)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
17% (112/19)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
