C. S. Jover
To Win
E. Zanada
To Win
Carlos Sanchez Jover vs Clement Tabur Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L W W L W W L
Form
W W W W W L W W W LHead-2-Head: Jover 1 - 0 Tabur
They have played 2 sets in total, with Jover winning 2 and Tabur winning 0. The last match between Jover and Tabur was at the M25 Tarragona, 27-03-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Clay, with Carlos Sanchez Jover getting the victory 6-4 7-6(5).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Carlos Sanchez Jover | 1 |
| Clement Tabur | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M25 Tarragona(27-03-2025)
6
4
7
6
| Jover | Stats | Tabur |
|---|---|---|
| 74% (26-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 72% (26-10) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 266 | Ranking | 301 |
| 260 | Highest Rank | 202 |
| 24 | Age | 25 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 8 | Titles | 10 |
| 62% (314-192) | Career Total W/L | 60% (281-187) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 3 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
12 May 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Shnaider VS Mertens PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome wta
12 May 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Paolini VS Ostapenko PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome wta
12 May 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Carlos Sanchez Jover
Player
Clement Tabur
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
81)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
79
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 10 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:8:31 | Average Match Time | 2:8:31 |
| 56% (40/71) | 1st Serve % | 59% (48/81) |
| 70% (28/40) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (32/48) |
| 48% (15/31) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (13/33) |
| 25% (3/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 67% (2/3) |
| 44% (36/81) | Return Points Win % | 39% (28/71) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jover vs Tabur Match Preview :
Gather around, tennis fans, because the stats are in, and they're funnier than a penguin trying to play ping-pong! We're talking Jover and Tabur, and these competitors are ready to serve up some action. First up, let's talk about second serves – Jover's got a second serve win rate of 42.22%, while Tabur edges ahead at 46.71%. It's like comparing a well-cooked steak to a slightly better-cooked steak – both are good, but one wins the day, barely.
And just how good are these players at returning serves? Jover, our nimble court ninja, snatches 48.83% of second serve points from opponents like a cat swiping its owner's snacks. On the other hand, Tabur, the ever-cunning tennis fox, has been able to claim 44.46% of those tasty points. When first serves come tumbling in, Jover grabs 32.41%, while Tabur holds on to 27.42% – it's a bit like counting how many cookies each can catch simultaneously!
Now, let's see these players under pressure! Jover's a cool cucumber, saving 50.62% of breakpoints, but Tabur magically escapes 54.25% of them, Houdini-style. Over this last swinging year, Jover's match-winning rate is a whopping 72.5%, while Tabur's numbers tell a modest tale with a 49.21% win rate – it's a classic hare versus tortoise, and you know how that story goes.
What about their favorite battle zones? Well, Jover puts on a clay-court show with a 64% winning streak, thriving in the mud like a festival-goer in Wellington boots. Meanwhile, Tabur on hard courts is unstoppable, boasting a 67% win record – it's the tennis equivalent of fish in water! Both have a zero percent grass win rate, clearly allergic to freshly trimmed lawns.
In last year's lower tier battles, Jover shone in Futures fairyland, triumphing in 85.71% of matches, while Tabur tackled tougher foes with a 50% winning rate on Challenger stages. Opponents have given Jover more of a runaround, with an average rank of 385.24 compared to Tabur's 310.81 opponents – it's like pitting high school football teams against pros!
Crackling under decisive set conditions, Jover comes out victorious 70% of the time, while Tabur is successful in only 33% of deciders – talk about handling pressure like a pro! And when it comes to breakpoints, Jover arguably converts at an impressive 37.37%, closely pursued by Tabur with 34.07% – almost as close as my two front teeth!
So, folks, when you piece all this comedic chaos together, our pick for the crown goes to Jover. The stats declare a victor, and it's going to be a match for the books! Keep your remote handy, and prepare for volleys of excitement and chuckles!
Carlos Sanchez Jover Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Carlos Sanchez Jover
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carlos Sanchez Jover
Player
Mathys Erhard
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Sanchez Jover
Player
Lorenzo Carboni
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
46%
(
37 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andrea Guerrieri
Player
Carlos Sanchez Jover
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
44%
(
27 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carlos Sanchez Jover
Player
Michele Ribecai
67%
(
61 of
91)
1st Serve %
63%
(
59 of
94)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
94)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Sanchez Jover
Player
Johan Nikles
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
91)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
52%
(
32 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
47 of
91)
77
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Carlos Sanchez Jover
83%
(
72 of
87)
1st Serve %
71%
(
89 of
125)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
53 of
89)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
19%
(
4 of
21)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
39%
(
34 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
58 of
125)
111
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Carlos Sanchez Jover
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
55%
(
17 of
31)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
43%
(
19 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
51
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carlos Sanchez Jover
Player
Luciano Carraro
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
32 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
6-1 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carlos Sanchez Jover
Player
Samuele Pieri
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
48 of
83)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
76
Total Points Won
72
|
2-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Clement Tabur Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Andrej Nedic
Player
Clement Tabur
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
53
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Vladan Tadic
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
69%
(
29 of
42)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Branko Djuric
74%
(
62 of
84)
1st Serve %
55%
(
47 of
86)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Marko Maksimovic
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
50%
(
32 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Arthur Reymond
Player
Clement Tabur
62%
(
57 of
92)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
31 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
85)
94
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
59%
(
16 of
27)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
43%
(
19 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
46
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Kilian Feldbausch
66%
(
77 of
117)
1st Serve %
75%
(
92 of
123)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
49%
(
38 of
77)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
49 of
92)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
59 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
63 of
123)
121
Total Points Won
119
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Leo Raquillet
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
3
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
4
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Maxence Bertimon
49%
(
21 of
43)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
86%
(
19 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Nikolas Sanchez-Izquierdo
54%
(
44 of
81)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (314/192) | Win/Loss | 60% (281/187) |
| 59% (688/475) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (618/451) |
| 54% (5859/5004) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (5333/4699) |
| 48% (25/27) | Hard Win/Loss | 67% (84/41) |
| 64% (289/164) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (165/105) |
| 0% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 44% (32/40) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.21 |
| 447 | Aces Total | 1045 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 1108 | Total Double Faults | 1055 |
| 1:30:1 | Average Match Time | 1:35:19 |
| 448.66 | Average Opponent Rank | 446.3 |
| 64% (19139/29958) | 1st Serve % | 61% (17159/28196) |
| 62% (11823/19139) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (11502/17159) |
| 50% (5375/10826) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (5456/11036) |
| 45% (1747/3846) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1422/3172) |
| 45% (13771/30426) | Return Points Win % | 43% (12236/28756) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/4) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 50% (65/64) | Challenger W/L | 50% (64/63) |
| 66% (249/127) | Futures W/L | 65% (217/118) |
| 62% (306/497) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (277/463) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (59/112) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (66/119) |
| 57% (89/156) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (78/138) |
| 87% (294/257) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (264/238) |
| 12% (294/36) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (264/26) |
| 26% (212/55) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (204/43) |
Jover vs. Tabur Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
