Carlos Alcaraz vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Head-To-Head
3 - 1
79% (294-77)
Career Total W/L
62% (356-219)
91% (10-1)
Win/Loss
38% (3-5)
$26,298,970
Career Prize Money
$3,342,920
1
YTD Titles
0
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Navone VS Baena PREDICTION Clay
Rio Open - Rio de Janeiro atp
17 Feb 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Cirstea VS Parks PREDICTION Hard
Dubai Duty Free Championships - Dubai wta
18 Feb 2025 / Second
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Alcaraz VS Zandschulp H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 3-6 6-1 |
Stats 
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
56%
(
53 of
95)
1st Serve %
63%
(
63 of
100)
3
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
8
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
100)
101
Total Points Won
94
|
||||
| 6-1 7-5 6-4 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Carlos Alcaraz
66%
(
63 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
2
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
1
78%
(
49 of
63)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
33 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
92
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
75%
(
45 of
60)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
| 6-1 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
48 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
49 of
90)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
24 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
90)
99
Total Points Won
75
|
||||
Alcaraz VS Zandschulp H2H Stats
stats
3
H2H Matches
1
7
Sets Won
4
56
Games Won
47
8
Aces (Total)
13
8
Total Double Faults
25
2:3:20
Average Match Time
2:3:20
61% (189/309)
1st Serve %
60% (203/340)
70% (132/189)
1st Serve Win %
71% (144/203)
55% (66/120)
2nd Serve Win %
41% (56/137)
47% (15/32)
Break Points Won % (Total)
50% (11/22)
41% (140/340)
Return Points Win %
36% (111/309)
100% (2/2)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/2)
50% (1/2)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
50% (1/2)
100% (1/1)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/1)
100% (3/3)
1st Set Won, Won Match
100% (1/1)
0% (3/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (1/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (3/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Carlos Alcaraz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Marin Cilic
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Alex De Minaur
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
78)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
26 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Hubert Hurkacz
61%
(
59 of
96)
1st Serve %
63%
(
62 of
99)
5
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
1
80%
(
47 of
59)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
45 of
62)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
29 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
99)
102
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Andrea Vavassori
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
56%
(
53 of
95)
1st Serve %
63%
(
63 of
100)
3
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
8
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
100)
101
Total Points Won
94
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Novak Djokovic
Player
Carlos Alcaraz
63%
(
86 of
136)
1st Serve %
74%
(
92 of
125)
5
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
5
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
62 of
92)
58%
(
29 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
53 of
136)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
52 of
125)
135
Total Points Won
126
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Jack Draper
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
6
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Nuno Borges
61%
(
67 of
109)
1st Serve %
69%
(
94 of
137)
9
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
84%
(
56 of
67)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
60 of
94)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
29 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
54 of
137)
134
Total Points Won
112
|
6-2 6-4 6-7(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Yoshihito Nishioka
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
14
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
11 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
80
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Abedallah Shelbayh
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Otto Virtanen
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
66%
(
27 of
41)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
93%
(
28 of
30)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
4 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Ergi Kirkin
54%
(
15 of
28)
1st Serve %
77%
(
23 of
30)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
87%
(
13 of
15)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
6 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
38
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Sonego
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
70%
(
55 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
7
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
72
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
56%
(
53 of
95)
1st Serve %
63%
(
63 of
100)
3
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
8
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
100)
101
Total Points Won
94
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
10
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
63%
(
59 of
93)
1st Serve %
50%
(
45 of
90)
13
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
7
81%
(
48 of
59)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
28 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
105
Total Points Won
78
|
6-1 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nishesh Basavareddy
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
66 of
116)
1st Serve %
60%
(
67 of
112)
6
Aces
13
8
Double Faults
8
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
46 of
67)
50%
(
25 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
41 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
43 of
112)
118
Total Points Won
110
|
6-7(3) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Matteo Berrettini
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
16
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Daniel Altmaier
69%
(
86 of
124)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
99)
4
Aces
16
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
58 of
86)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
45 of
61)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
45 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
99)
114
Total Points Won
109
|
6-4 6-7(12) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats
79% (294/77)
Win/Loss
62% (356/219)
72% (688/268)
Sets Win/Loss
59% (811/572)
57% (5272/3966)
Games Win/Loss
53% (6945/6120)
80% (102/26)
Hard Win/Loss
59% (64/45)
80% (143/35)
Clay Win/Loss
62% (167/101)
66% (25/13)
Indoor Hard W/L
66% (114/60)
89% (24/3)
Grass Win/Loss
46% (11/13)
0.27
Aces Per Game
0.44
1219
Aces Total
2824
0.19
Double Faults Per Game
0.33
848
Total Double Faults
2089
1:57:19
Average Match Time
1:35:14
188.39
Average Opponent Rank
385.71
66% (18312/27901)
1st Serve %
62% (23402/37958)
70% (12790/18312)
1st Serve Win %
72% (16737/23402)
55% (5305/9589)
2nd Serve Win %
48% (7022/14559)
42% (1417/3351)
Break Points Won % (Total)
43% (1732/4016)
42% (12510/29639)
Return Points Win %
41% (15903/39118)
84% (70/13)
Slam W/L
62% (32/20)
76% (65/21)
Masters W/L
49% (22/23)
90% (9/1)
Cups W/L
63% (12/7)
79% (74/20)
Main Tour W/L
51% (63/60)
43% (3/4)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
77% (37/11)
Challenger W/L
63% (72/42)
84% (31/6)
Futures W/L
70% (155/67)
78% (230/294)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
63% (329/524)
85% (62/73)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
53% (20/38)
63% (98/155)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
56% (99/178)
71% (80/113)
Deciding Set Win %
57% (109/190)
93% (267/247)
1st Set Won, Won Match
89% (335/297)
7% (267/20)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
11% (335/37)
44% (102/45)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
24% (238/58)
See recent tennis photos of Alcaraz and Zandschulp
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Carlos Alcaraz
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Botic Van De Zandschulp
Other Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
