O. Crawford
To Win
H. Chung
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W L L L L LForm
W L W W W L W W W WThey have played 2 sets in total, with Cordoba winning 0 and Crawford winning 2. The last match between Cordoba and Crawford was at the M15 Villena, 19-02-2025, First, Hard with Oliver Crawford getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
M15 Villena(19-02-2025)
16 Mar 2025 / Final
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells wta
15 Mar 2025 / Final
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
15 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-2 |
![]() ![]()
Oliver Crawford
Player
Carles Cordoba
38%
(
3 of
8)
1st Serve %
50%
(
6 of
12)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
100%
(
3 of
3)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
60%
(
3 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
0%
(
0 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
11
Total Points Won
9
|
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Predictive Insights for Upcoming Tennis Match
In analyzing the performance of players and various statistics, we can make educated predictions about the upcoming tennis match. Let's delve into the data:
Second Serve Performance and Match Prediction Accuracy
In the past six months, Cordoba has demonstrated a success rate of 46.18% on their second serve, while Crawford has achieved a slightly higher rate of 51.49%. It is worth noting that there exists a significant correlation between this statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
Return Game Statistics and Head-to-Head Favorability
Recent return stats reveal that Cordoba has succeeded in winning 49.64% of their opponent's second serve points, while Crawford boasts a slightly superior rate of 52.79%. For first serve returns, Cordoba has achieved a rate of 34.71%, whereas Crawford stands at 32.99%. This data strongly influences the favorability of each player in the head-to-head matchup.
Under Pressure Analysis
In terms of saving crucial breakpoints, Cordoba has displayed an impressive ability to save 60.16% in recent form. Similarly, Crawford has managed to save 60% of breakpoints. This statistic is particularly useful in determining in-game betting predictions.
Performance Overview and Head-to-Head Prediction
Considering their performances over the past year, Cordoba has triumphed in 48.15% of matches played (W/L 13/14), whereas Crawford has a higher victory rate of 55.56% (W/L 30/24). This paints us an overall picture of their head-to-head prediction.
Exploiting the Best Surface
When it comes to surface preferences, Cordoba excels on Clay, with a win rate of 44% (W/L 16/20), but struggles on Hard, having achieved no victories in that category (W/L 0/1). On the other hand, Crawford's prowess is most evident on Clay, boasting an impressive win rate of 68% (W/L 167/77), while they have yet to secure a win on Grass (W/L 0/1).
Evaluating Player Level
In the past year, Cordoba has primarily participated in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a prize of $10K, achieving a success rate of 48.15% in matches (W/L 13/14). Conversely, Crawford has predominantly competed in the same category of tournaments, winning an outstanding 74.19% of matches (W/L 23/8). The player's statistics should be considered relative to the event level at which they have been competing in order to make accurate predictions about the favorite.
Opponent Quality
Over the course of the previous 12 months, Cordoba has faced opponents with an average rank of 304.81, while Crawford's opponents have held an average rank of 232.81. This information offers valuable insight into the level of competition each player has encountered.
Deciding Set Performance
For those interested in live predictions and betting, if the match reaches a deciding set, Cordoba holds an impressive record of winning 58% of deciding sets over the past year, whereas Crawford has won 47% of all matches played on tour. These statistics are relevant in evaluating potential outcomes.
Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics
Examining past player performances is undoubtedly beneficial in predicting tennis matches, but it is equally crucial to consider current event statistics when assessing the form of the players. For this, refer to the section below if they have already competed in the ongoing event. Additionally, certain players may perform exceptionally well in specific events, which must be factored in when making outcome predictions.
Break Point Conversion
When reviewing recent form, Cordoba has impressively converted 41.56% of their breakpoint opportunities, whereas Crawford has capitalized on 45.16% of their chances to break their opponent's serve. This statistic carries significant weight in providing real-time betting tips when either player finds themselves with a breakpoint opportunity.
If you are interested in delving deeper into models that predict tennis matches, the following article serves as an excellent starting point. Please note that it caters to statistics enthusiasts exclusively.
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 1-6 6-3 10-5 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Oliver Crawford
Player
Carles Cordoba
38%
(
3 of
8)
1st Serve %
50%
(
6 of
12)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
100%
(
3 of
3)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
60%
(
3 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
0%
(
0 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
11
Total Points Won
9
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Gabriele Piraino
Player
Carles Cordoba
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
15 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Sergi Fita Juan
Player
Carles Cordoba
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
70%
(
50 of
71)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Carles Cordoba
Player
Mohamed Safwat
78%
(
80 of
103)
1st Serve %
46%
(
47 of
103)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
6
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
40%
(
41 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
44 of
103)
106
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-4 4-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 7-5 2-6 10-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 4-6 7-6(1) 10-3 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SF |
![]() ![]()
Oliver Crawford
Player
Akira Santillan
63%
(
69 of
109)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
102)
4
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
8
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
46 of
57)
65%
(
26 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
34%
(
37 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
36 of
102)
108
Total Points Won
103
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Oliver Crawford
Player
Tianhui Zhang
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve %
38%
(
16 of
42)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
89%
(
16 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Oliver Crawford
Player
Pengyu Lu
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Oliver Crawford
Player
Wishaya Trongcharoenchaikul
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
91)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Oliver Crawford
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Oliver Crawford
Player
Miguel Damas
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Oliver Crawford
Player
Adrien Gobat
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Oliver Crawford
Player
Sergio Callejon Hernando
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Darwin Blanch
Player
Oliver Crawford
61%
(
71 of
117)
1st Serve %
75%
(
86 of
114)
8
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
0
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
59 of
86)
54%
(
25 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
47 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
43 of
114)
113
Total Points Won
118
|
1-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Oliver Crawford
Player
Alejandro Manzanera Pertusa
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
3
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
76
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H |
view more
View full predicted draw for Crawford