Carl Emil Overbeck vs Ty Host Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 21 Oct at 12:41 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Emil Overbeck vs T. Host

DEN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Overbeck 1 - 0 Host
They have played 2 sets in total, with Carl Emil Overbeck winning 2 and Ty Host winning 0. The last match between Carl Emil Overbeck and Ty Host was at the M25 Brisbane, 21-10-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Carl Emil Overbeck getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Overbeck | 1 |
| Host | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) M25 Brisbane(10-21-25)
C. E. Overbeck vs T. Host H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 65.48% (55-29) | Career Total W/L | 27.27% (9-24) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. E. Overbeck vs T. Host Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: In recent months, Ty Host holds a slight edge with 43.02% of points won on their second serve compared to Carl Emil Overbeck's 42.75%. Could this small advantage impact the overall match outcome? Possibly, as such stats are strong predictors.
- Return Game Edge: Carl Emil Overbeck leads in returning their opponent's serves, capturing 48.64% on second serves and 30.77% on first serves, notably outperforming Ty Host's 41.70% and 25.72%, respectively. This could indicate a critical advantage in breaking their opponent’s serve.
- Under Pressure: Both players perform closely under pressure, saving breakpoints with Carl Emil Overbeck at 48.47% and Ty Host slightly higher at 50.56%. This might influence tight moments during crucial games.
- Overall Match Performance: Within the past year, Carl Emil Overbeck has demonstrated greater success, winning 56.52% of matches, while Ty Host has a lower win rate at 27.27%. Is this a clear indication of superiority? It appears so when looking at overall consistency.
- Surface Preference: Carl Emil Overbeck is comfortable on Indoor Hard surfaces (60% win rate) while Ty Host prefers Grass (60% win rate) but struggles with Hard court performance (19%). Does Overbeck have an edge on faster surfaces? Potentially.
- Player Level and Opponent Quality: Both athletes frequently compete in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events. Overbeck has been more successful, with a 59.09% win rate compared to Host's 31.58%. When facing quality opponents, Overbeck competes against players averaging a rank of 404.43, while Host faces slightly higher-ranked players at 305.5.
- Deciding Set Success: Overbeck's ability to capture deciding sets is notable, winning 60% in the last year, whereas Host only secures 25%, potentially indicating stronger resilience in tight match situations.
- Current Event Performance: Comparing past performances can guide predictions, but how a player fares in ongoing events can be a more immediate indicator. Monitoring this should offer clues about their likelihood to prevail.
Editorial Prediction (October 21, 2025, UTC):
Carl Emil Overbeck demonstrates notable strengths in return games and overall match success, holding an edge over Ty Host in recent form and pressure situations. Meanwhile, Host's slightly better second-serve stats and challenging opponent encounters provide only a minor advantage.
The history of better performance on faster surfaces suggests Overbeck is more adaptable in finicky court conditions, giving him an upper hand. Despite close breakpoint saving, Overbeck's superior ability to win decisive sets promotes resilience in matches that may be tightly contested.
Considering these elements, Carl Emil Overbeck is the likely winner for the upcoming match, owing to his more consistent results and ability to capitalize on critical return opportunities.
Carl Emil Overbeck vs Ty Host Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. E. Overbeck vs T. Host H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:14:40 | Average Match Time | 1:14:40 |
| 57% (28/49) | 1st Serve % | 58% (32/55) |
| 75% (21/28) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (19/32) |
| 67% (14/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 30% (7/23) |
| 50% (4/8) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (29/55) | Return Points Win % | 29% (14/49) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. E. Overbeck Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 7-6(5) 6-4 | ||
R2 | W | 6-3 3-1 ret. | ||
R1 | W | 3-6 7-5 6-2 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 5-7 6-1 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-2 6-2 | ||
T. Host Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 7-6(6) 6-4 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-4 3-6 11-9 | ||
Q2 | L | 5-2 ret. | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 7-5 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||

C. E. Overbeck vs T. Host Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65.48% (55/29) | YTD Win/Loss | 27.27% (9/24) |
| 62.03% (116/71) | Sets Win/Loss | 35.06% (27/50) |
| 55.25% (969/785) | Games Win/Loss | 45.74% (354/420) |
| 74.19% (23/8) | Hard Win/Loss | 24.14% (7/22) |
| 60.42% (29/19) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 60.00% (3/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (2/2) |
| 0.35 | Aces Per Game | 0.18 |
| 295 | Aces Total | 70 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 199 | Total Double Faults | 67 |
| 1:14:25 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 330.87 | Average Opponent Rank | 246.58 |
| 64% (2722/4270) | 1st Serve % | 60% (697/1161) |
| 69% (1882/2722) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (463/697) |
| 48% (737/1548) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (205/464) |
| 44% (207/473) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (30/79) |
| 42% (1813/4312) | Return Points Win % | 35% (399/1150) |
| 64.71% (11/6) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 65.67% (44/23) | Futures W/L | 30.00% (9/21) |
| 65% (55/84) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 28% (9/32) |
| 40% (6/15) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 43% (3/7) |
| 68% (13/19) | Deciding Set Win % | 25% (3/12) |
| 96% (48/46) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (8/7) |
| 4% (48/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (8/1) |
| 25% (36/9) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (25/2) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Kamilla Rakhimova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Open In Arte Angers Loire – 6th December 2025 Best Bets

Open In Arte Angers Loire – Angers Preview And Prediction: Tamara Korpatsch vs Anna-Lena Friedsam Betting Tips & Picks December 6, 2025

Alycia Parks vs Tamara Korpatsch Prediction – WTA Open In Arte Angers Loire – 5th December 2025 Best Bets

Panna Udvardy vs Despina Papamichail Prediction – WTA Quito Open – 5th December 2025 Best Bets

Dominika Salkova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Open In Arte Angers Loire – 5th December 2025 Best Bets
