A. Rublev
To Win
T. M. Etcheverry
To Win
Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Tomas Martin Etcheverry Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L W L L L
Form
L W L W W W L L L WHead-To-Head: Carabelli 6 - 6 Etcheverry
They have played 31 sets in total, with Carabelli winning 15 and Etcheverry winning 16. The last match between Carabelli and Etcheverry was at the Hamburg Open - Hamburg, 21-05-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Clay, with Tomas Martin Etcheverry getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Camilo Ugo Carabelli | 6 |
| Tomas Martin Etcheverry | 6 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Hamburg Open - Hamburg(21-05-2025)
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
6
4
6
4
| Carabelli | Stats | Etcheverry |
|---|---|---|
| 61% (25-16) | YTD Win/Loss | 44% (15-19) |
| 6 | Head-to-Head | 6 |
| 53 | Ranking | 63 |
| 51 | Highest Rank | 27 |
| 26 | Age | 25 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 12 | Titles | 8 |
| 63% (372-216) | Career Total W/L | 62% (360-223) |
| $462,400 | Career Prize Money | $3,027,805 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 2 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 4 | Clay H2H | 6 |
Upcoming Match
19 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sonego VS Zverev PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
19 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sinner VS Bublik PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
18 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Carabelli VS Etcheverry H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
80)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
| 6-3 3-6 7-5 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
59%
(
57 of
96)
1st Serve %
72%
(
67 of
93)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
41 of
67)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
39 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
96
Total Points Won
93
|
||||
| 7-6(9) 4-6 7-5 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
69%
(
84 of
121)
1st Serve %
65%
(
87 of
133)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
53 of
87)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
40%
(
49 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
58 of
133)
130
Total Points Won
124
|
||||
| 6-1 4-6 7-5 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
82%
(
82 of
100)
1st Serve %
65%
(
75 of
115)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
54 of
82)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
47 of
75)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
29%
(
6 of
21)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
38%
(
38 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
51 of
115)
113
Total Points Won
102
|
||||
| 4-6 6-2 7-5 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
81%
(
88 of
109)
1st Serve %
76%
(
76 of
100)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
47 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
49 of
100)
111
Total Points Won
98
|
||||
| 6-3 7-5 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
| 7-6(9) 6-2 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve %
67%
(
53 of
79)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
| 7-5 6-2 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
21%
(
4 of
19)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
83
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
| 3-6 6-4 6-2 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
29 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
87)
83
Total Points Won
82
|
||||
| 2-6 7-5 6-0 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
77%
(
60 of
78)
1st Serve %
63%
(
58 of
92)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
92)
92
Total Points Won
78
|
||||
view more
Carabelli VS Etcheverry H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6 | H2H Matches | 6 |
| 15 | Sets Won | 16 |
| 151 | Games Won | 151 |
| 18 | Aces (Total) | 32 |
| 29 | Total Double Faults | 15 |
| 2:28:18 | Average Match Time | 2:28:18 |
| 65% (649/994) | 1st Serve % | 71% (673/949) |
| 64% (415/649) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (435/673) |
| 47% (161/345) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (137/276) |
| 40% (38/95) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 34% (41/122) |
| 40% (377/949) | Return Points Win % | 42% (418/994) |
| 50% (6/12) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (6/12) |
| 50% (1/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 57% (4/7) | Deciding Set Win % | 43% (3/7) |
| 75% (4/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 63% (8/5) |
| 25% (4/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 38% (8/3) |
| 38% (8/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (4/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Carabelli vs Etcheverry Match Preview :
- Carabelli claims 44.07% of points from the second serve over recent months, whereas Etcheverry secures 47.72%. Which player exhibits a stronger second serve? Etcheverry holds a slight advantage in this area.
- In returning second serves, Carabelli shows superiority with a win rate of 48.43%, compared to Etcheverry's 44.99%.
- Regarding first serve return proficiency, Carabelli prevails again, capturing 29.26% of points, while Etcheverry manages 25.25%.
- Examining pressure scenarios, Etcheverry saves 57% of breakpoints, slightly surpassing Carabelli, who saves 53.26%.
- In the past year, Carabelli boasts a higher match win rate at 65.88%, contrasting with Etcheverry's 47.62% success rate.
- Both players excel on clay, with Carabelli having a 65% career win rate, marginally trailing Etcheverry's 66%.
- Playing levels reveal Carabelli thrives in Challenger and ITF circuits with a 76.92% win rate, whereas Etcheverry competes mainly on the main tour, winning 42.86% of his matches.
- In their direct encounters, Carabelli leads with 6 wins out of 11 matches, while Etcheverry claims 5, showcasing closely matched opponents.
- With a history of 29 sets played, Carabelli holds a narrow lead, taking 15, compared to Etcheverry's 14.
- For deciding sets, Carabelli excels, winning 71% across the board, as opposed to Etcheverry's 42% success rate.
- Carabelli faces opponents with an average rank of 189.26; Etcheverry competes against higher-ranked players averaging 84.83.
- Break point conversion favors Carabelli, who converts 35.04% of opportunities, distinctly outperforming Etcheverry's 22.93% rate.
Editorial Prediction (May 21, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing recent performances, Carabelli displays a strong return game and efficacy in winning deciding sets, giving him a notable edge in critical moments. Notably, he converts break points more effectively.
When competing under pressure, Etcheverry shows proficiency in saving breakpoints, hinting at resilience. However, Carabelli's superior overall match win rate over the past year and historical advantage in head-to-head meetings suggest a trend.
Given Carabelli’s slight edge on clay, combined with his success in head-to-head scenarios, he emerges as the probable favorite in this match-up.
Carabelli vs Etcheverry Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Camilo Ugo Carabelli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Reilly Opelka
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
21
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
89%
(
39 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
23%
(
15 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaume Antoni Munar Clar
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
52%
(
56 of
107)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
27 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
50 of
107)
111
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
80)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Sebastian Baez
59%
(
69 of
116)
1st Serve %
75%
(
55 of
73)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
49%
(
23 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
46%
(
53 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
97
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
56%
(
70 of
125)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
55 of
125)
107
Total Points Won
102
|
1-6 7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Luca Nardi
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Otto Virtanen
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve %
69%
(
54 of
78)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Tomas Martin Etcheverry Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
9
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
58%
(
45 of
77)
1st Serve %
73%
(
75 of
103)
7
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
44 of
75)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
28 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
46 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
57%
(
53 of
93)
1st Serve %
54%
(
58 of
108)
12
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
6
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
63%
(
25 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
27 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
108)
112
Total Points Won
89
|
7-5 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
57%
(
60 of
106)
1st Serve %
55%
(
56 of
101)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
54%
(
25 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
42 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
38 of
101)
102
Total Points Won
105
|
2-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Jiri Lehecka
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
72%
(
53 of
74)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
80)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Francisco Comesana
52%
(
39 of
75)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Bublik
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
86)
11
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
1
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
86)
90
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (372/216) | Win/Loss | 62% (360/223) |
| 60% (818/544) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (825/572) |
| 54% (6777/5802) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (7156/6131) |
| 54% (35/30) | Hard Win/Loss | 48% (43/46) |
| 65% (336/182) | Clay Win/Loss | 65% (301/159) |
| 50% (1/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (12/9) |
| 0% (0/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 31% (4/9) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.36 |
| 1068 | Aces Total | 2343 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 1302 | Total Double Faults | 858 |
| 1:41:21 | Average Match Time | 1:53:25 |
| 367.13 | Average Opponent Rank | 360.57 |
| 62% (23632/38125) | 1st Serve % | 67% (26290/39018) |
| 66% (15681/23632) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (18208/26290) |
| 50% (7174/14492) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (6534/12728) |
| 45% (2018/4471) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1715/4096) |
| 43% (16632/38714) | Return Points Win % | 40% (16190/40193) |
| 40% (8/12) | Slam W/L | 54% (20/17) |
| 41% (7/10) | Masters W/L | 36% (12/21) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 67% (4/2) |
| 49% (21/22) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (58/57) |
| 66% (190/100) | Challenger W/L | 67% (129/63) |
| 67% (146/72) | Futures W/L | 69% (136/62) |
| 64% (361/565) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (339/544) |
| 50% (7/14) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 52% (17/33) |
| 55% (81/147) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (99/197) |
| 59% (107/180) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (103/190) |
| 89% (343/305) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (358/299) |
| 10% (343/35) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (358/57) |
| 27% (245/66) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (224/57) |
Carabelli vs. Etcheverry Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
