Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Matchstat.com expert prediction for the Carabelli Almeida H2H. Here is our in-depth stats analysis and accurate prediction of the Carabelli Almeida head to head.
Full Stats Used To Calculate Our Carabelli Vs Almeida Prediction Are Further Down This Page. Here Is A Brief Snapshot
The best career year for Carabelli was 2018 when he won 74% of matches played on all surfaces (51/18). Almeida was in the best form in 2021 when he had victories of 71% of his matches (72/29). In their last event played, Almeida made the Second round at Temuco Challenger, whereas Carabelli played Montevideo Challenger and made the Quarterfinals.
141
Rank
96
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
341
Rank
190
High
22
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
63% (289-170)
Career Total W/L
59% (166-114)
61% (41-26)
YTD W/L
44% (20-25)
$107,340
Career Prize Money
$49,495
1
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Camilo Ugo Carabelli | Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:50:55 | 1:50:55 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (50/72) | 67% (38/57) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (35/50) | 68% (26/38) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 59% (13/22) | 42% (8/19) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (3/3) | 17% (1/6) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (23/57) | 33% (24/72) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Recent Form Is Very Important In Predicting An Upcoming H2H. Recent Matches With Stats…
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 6-2 |
Stats 
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
57)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Camilo Ugo Carabelli | Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 61% (41/26) | 44% (20/25) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 57% (93/69) | 49% (51/54) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (785/706) | 49% (482/498) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 25% (1/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 63% (41/24) | 46% (19/22) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.17 | 0.17 |
| Aces Total | 127 | 82 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 142 | 91 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:50 | 1:55:13 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 268.12 | 283.11 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (3158/4838) | 68% (2172/3199) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (2066/3158) | 64% (1394/2172) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (815/1680) | 48% (498/1027) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (240/548) | 43% (137/319) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (2060/4842) | 41% (1295/3168) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 60% (6/4) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 65% (33/18) | 45% (19/23) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (41/66) | 44% (19/43) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 70% (16/23) | 44% (7/16) |
| Deciding Set W% | 63% (17/27) | 27% (4/15) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (40/35) | 77% (22/17) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (40/5) | 18% (22/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 22% (27/6) | 13% (23/3) |
Camilo Ugo Carabelli Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Thiago Moura Monteiro
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
68%
(
59 of
87)
1st Serve %
54%
(
53 of
99)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
7
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
32%
(
9 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
16 of
46)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
34 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
87
|
6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Elias Ymer
61%
(
51 of
84)
1st Serve %
57%
(
59 of
103)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
27 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
49 of
103)
106
Total Points Won
81
|
6-2 6-7(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Federico Coria
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(3) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
29 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Hugo Dellien
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
62%
(
61 of
98)
1st Serve %
52%
(
46 of
88)
0
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
5
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
42)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
42%
(
41 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
44 of
88)
101
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Luciano Darderi
63%
(
57 of
91)
1st Serve %
63%
(
66 of
105)
6
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
29 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
105)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Guido Andreozzi
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
47%
(
27 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
37 of
66)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
63%
(
61 of
97)
1st Serve %
60%
(
72 of
120)
4
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
4
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
43 of
72)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
35 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
51 of
120)
113
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 7-6(8) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Bruno Kuzuhara
72%
(
66 of
92)
1st Serve %
65%
(
78 of
120)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
47 of
78)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
33%
(
30 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
50 of
120)
112
Total Points Won
100
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
58%
(
52 of
89)
1st Serve %
52%
(
39 of
75)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
51%
(
45 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
75)
85
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
48%
(
19 of
40)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Renzo Olivo
75%
(
56 of
75)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Jorge Brian Panta Herreros
78%
(
49 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alejandro Tabilo
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
70%
(
51 of
73)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
81)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
31 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
44 of
81)
86
Total Points Won
68
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Andres Andrade
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Agustin Tirante
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Carabelli Vs Almeida Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
