Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Hamad Medjedovic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W W L L W L
Form
W L W L W W W L L LH2H: Carabelli 1 - 1 Medjedovic
They have played 4 sets in total, with Carabelli winning 2 and Medjedovic winning 2. The last match between Carabelli and Medjedovic was at the Monte-Carlo Rolex Masters - Monte-Carlo, 06-04-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Camilo Ugo Carabelli getting the victory 7-5 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Camilo Ugo Carabelli | 1 |
| Hamad Medjedovic | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Monte-Carlo Rolex Masters - Monte-Carlo(06-04-2025)
7
5
6
4
| Carabelli | Stats | Medjedovic |
|---|---|---|
| 64% (21-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 68% (17-8) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 60 | Ranking | 72 |
| 59 | Highest Rank | 61 |
| 25 | Age | 21 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 12 | Titles | 9 |
| 63% (368-212) | Career Total W/L | 64% (162-92) |
| $430,830 | Career Prize Money | $764,910 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Paolini VS Ostapenko PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome wta
12 May 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Shnaider VS Mertens PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome wta
12 May 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Carabelli VS Medjedovic H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-4 |
Stats 
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
6
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
||||
| 7-6(1) 6-2 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
12
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
Carabelli VS Medjedovic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 21 | Games Won | 22 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 18 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:42:12 | Average Match Time | 1:42:12 |
| 60% (91/151) | 1st Serve % | 61% (80/132) |
| 67% (61/91) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (57/80) |
| 40% (24/60) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (22/52) |
| 70% (7/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (7/21) |
| 40% (53/132) | Return Points Win % | 44% (66/151) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Carabelli vs Medjedovic Match Preview :
Analyzing the recent performance of the players, Carabelli has managed to secure 43.27% of points on his second serve over the past six months, slightly trailing behind Medjedovic, who has a second serve win rate of 44.74%. This statistic is highly indicative of potential match outcomes, providing critical insights into the players' effectiveness.
When examining return game performance, Carabelli exhibits a solid performance by claiming 48.59% of points on his opponent's second serves, compared to Medjedovic's 41.32%. For return points won on first serves, Carabelli leads with 29.23%, while Medjedovic comes in slightly lower at 24.47%. These return statistics are greatly correlated with determining the favored player in a head-to-head matchup.
In terms of performing under pressure, Medjedovic's ability to save breakpoints is superior, as evidenced by a 54.5% breakpoint save rate compared to Carabelli's 51.24%. Meanwhile, Carabelli's 35.69% breakpoint conversion rate outshines Medjedovic's 32.67%, offering vital insights for in-game betting scenarios.
Looking at their overall match performance over the last year, Carabelli has claimed victory in 61.9% of his matches (52 wins out of 84), whereas Medjedovic has surpassed this with a win rate of 68.57% (48 wins out of 70). Both players have played extensively at the Challengers/ITF tournament level, with Carabelli winning 73.08% of such matches and Medjedovic achieving a 70.37% win rate.
Both players excel on Clay courts, with Carabelli holding a 65% career win rate and Medjedovic slightly ahead at 68%. Conversely, Carabelli has struggled on Grass with a 0% win rate, while Medjedovic's lowest winning percentage is on Hard courts at 59%.
In their previous meetings, Medjedovic leads the head-to-head record, having won their sole encounter at the Internazionali BNL d'Italia on Clay. This match concluded in straight-set victory for Medjedovic, 7-6(1) 6-2, and both players have yet to play a deciding set against each other.
Furthermore, Carabelli's recent performance against opponents with an average rank of 201, slightly better than Medjedovic's average opponent rank of 205.06, might also play a role in determining the match outcome should it go the distance.
Lastly, Carabelli has demonstrated stronger performance in deciding sets over the last year, securing wins in 68% of such scenarios compared to Medjedovic’s 64%. Taking into account all these factors, Medjedovic's overall consistency in match wins, combined with his superior head-to-head record, suggests he holds the advantage in this upcoming clash.
Camilo Ugo Carabelli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Alexander Zverev
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
80%
(
35 of
44)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Pablo Carreno-Busta
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
69%
(
52 of
75)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
76
|
6-2 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexandre Muller
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
6
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Hugo Gaston
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Radu Albot
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Novak Djokovic
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
77%
(
49 of
64)
1st Serve %
50%
(
32 of
64)
10
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Alex Michelsen
67%
(
75 of
112)
1st Serve %
76%
(
73 of
96)
3
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
51 of
73)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
38 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
96)
106
Total Points Won
102
|
6-7(3) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Hamad Medjedovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
49%
(
39 of
79)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
63%
(
25 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
28 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
68%
(
92 of
135)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
109)
10
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
63 of
92)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
9%
(
2 of
22)
39%
(
52 of
135)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
109)
125
Total Points Won
119
|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
59%
(
55 of
93)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
89)
3
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
1
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
41%
(
38 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
71%
(
65 of
91)
5
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
6
81%
(
38 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
47 of
65)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
13 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
32 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Gabriel Diallo
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
79%
(
42 of
53)
5
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
15 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Hugo Dellien
70%
(
73 of
105)
1st Serve %
79%
(
81 of
103)
10
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
79%
(
58 of
73)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
60 of
81)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
31 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
35 of
103)
109
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(1) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
6
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Borna Gojo
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
96)
3
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
11 of
42)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
96)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rinky Hijikata
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
71%
(
67 of
95)
1st Serve %
65%
(
70 of
107)
4
Aces
14
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
44 of
70)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
40%
(
38 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
107)
102
Total Points Won
100
|
7-5 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (368/212) | Win/Loss | 64% (162/92) |
| 60% (810/533) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (357/233) |
| 54% (6692/5709) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (3027/2577) |
| 54% (35/30) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (34/24) |
| 65% (332/179) | Clay Win/Loss | 67% (83/41) |
| 50% (1/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62% (38/23) |
| 0% (0/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 64% (7/4) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.61 |
| 1046 | Aces Total | 1668 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
| 1280 | Total Double Faults | 831 |
| 1:41:8 | Average Match Time | 1:37:38 |
| 366.23 | Average Opponent Rank | 308.76 |
| 62% (23267/37511) | 1st Serve % | 62% (10632/17087) |
| 66% (15441/23267) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (7694/10632) |
| 49% (7049/14243) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (3294/6455) |
| 45% (1999/4415) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (699/1641) |
| 43% (16387/38083) | Return Points Win % | 39% (6730/17220) |
| 42% (8/11) | Slam W/L | 67% (14/7) |
| 41% (7/10) | Masters W/L | 53% (8/7) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 67% (2/1) |
| 50% (20/20) | Main Tour W/L | 59% (32/22) |
| 65% (187/99) | Challenger W/L | 63% (63/37) |
| 67% (146/72) | Futures W/L | 70% (43/18) |
| 64% (357/558) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (152/239) |
| 54% (7/13) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 56% (5/9) |
| 55% (80/145) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (51/103) |
| 59% (105/178) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (42/72) |
| 89% (340/302) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (159/142) |
| 10% (340/35) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (159/17) |
| 27% (240/65) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (94/19) |
Carabelli vs. Medjedovic Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
