G. Blancaneaux
To Win
C. H. Tseng
To Win
Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Chun Hsin Tseng Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L W L L L
Form
W W W W W W W W W LHead-To-Head: Carabelli 1 - 1 Tseng
They have played 5 sets in total, with Carabelli winning 2 and Tseng winning 3. The last match between Carabelli and Tseng was at the Turin Challenger, 16-05-2025, Round: Quarterfinals, Surface: Clay, with Camilo Ugo Carabelli getting the victory 1-6 7-6(2) 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Camilo Ugo Carabelli | 1 |
| Chun Hsin Tseng | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Turin Challenger(16-05-2025)
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Chun Hsin Tseng
1
6
7
6
6
1
| Carabelli | Stats | Tseng |
|---|---|---|
| 61% (25-16) | YTD Win/Loss | 58% (25-18) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 53 | Ranking | 96 |
| 51 | Highest Rank | 83 |
| 26 | Age | 23 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 12 | Titles | 10 |
| 63% (372-216) | Career Total W/L | 59% (264-185) |
| $462,400 | Career Prize Money | $379,795 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
21 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Vekic VS Shnaider PREDICTION Grass
Bad Homburg Open - Bad Homburg wta
22 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Minnen VS Todoni PREDICTION Grass
Rothesay International - Eastbourne wta
21 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-6 7-6(2) 6-1 |
Stats 
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
56%
(
70 of
125)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
55 of
125)
107
Total Points Won
102
|
||||
| 6-1 6-0 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
45%
(
15 of
33)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
100%
(
15 of
15)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
53
Total Points Won
20
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 15 | Games Won | 25 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:1:17 | Average Match Time | 2:1:17 |
| 56% (69/124) | 1st Serve % | 54% (85/158) |
| 61% (42/69) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (58/85) |
| 44% (24/55) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (39/73) |
| 27% (4/15) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (8/18) |
| 39% (61/158) | Return Points Win % | 47% (58/124) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Carabelli vs Tseng Match Preview :
- How do Carabelli and Tseng compare in their second serve performance? Recently, Tseng has a slight edge, winning 46.52% of second serve points compared to Carabelli's 43.88%.
- In terms of winning points off an opponent's second serve, Carabelli leads with 48.21% over Tseng's 46.03%.
- For first serve return stats, Carabelli also has the upper hand, grabbing 28.92% of points, while Tseng takes 26.27%.
- When under pressure, Tseng saves a higher percentage of breakpoints at 54.96%, compared to Carabelli's 52.82%.
- Over the past year, Carabelli has been more successful overall, winning 65.06% of matches versus Tseng's 56.25%.
- Both players perform best on clay; nevertheless, Carabelli leads with a 65% win rate in their career, slightly ahead of Tseng's 62%.
- At the Challenger/ITF level, Carabelli shines with a 78% win rate over the past year, while Tseng stands at 66.67%.
- Why might Tseng have an edge in head-to-head matches? Tseng has won their sole matchup convincingly, with a straight-sets victory.
- Tseng has faced opponents with a higher average rank (249) than Carabelli (191.41), which might affect performance perceptions.
- When it comes to deciding sets, Carabelli seems more reliable with a 69% success rate, in contrast to Tseng's 54%.
- Carabelli shows a better conversion in breakpoints, achieving 36.21% compared to Tseng's 30.17%.
Editorial Prediction (May 16, 2025, UTC):
In the upcoming match, the players exhibit differing strengths that could significantly influence the outcome. Carabelli has consistently demonstrated stronger performance on return games, particularly against second serves, which may allow him to capitalize on Tseng's service games.
Tseng, on the other hand, has showcased better resilience under pressure, saving more breakpoints and having a slight edge in head-to-head records. His recent victory over Carabelli in their previous encounter gives Tseng a psychological upper hand.
Analyzing recent statistics and surface preferences suggests that Carabelli may be more adept on clay, where both players will likely feel most comfortable. His superior overall match and breakpoint conversion rates hint at an ability to control proceedings effectively.
While Tseng can draw confidence from his past victory, Carabelli's recent form and return game strengths indicate that he is the probable winner for this upcoming match.
Carabelli vs Tseng Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Camilo Ugo Carabelli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Reilly Opelka
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
21
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
89%
(
39 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
23%
(
15 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaume Antoni Munar Clar
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
52%
(
56 of
107)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
27 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
50 of
107)
111
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
80)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Sebastian Baez
59%
(
69 of
116)
1st Serve %
75%
(
55 of
73)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
49%
(
23 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
46%
(
53 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
97
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
56%
(
70 of
125)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
55 of
125)
107
Total Points Won
102
|
1-6 7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Luca Nardi
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Otto Virtanen
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve %
69%
(
54 of
78)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Chun Hsin Tseng Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Hugo Dellien
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
19 of
25)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
15 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Alejandro Tabilo
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Jurij Rodionov
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
66%
(
48 of
73)
0
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Luca Van Assche
44%
(
26 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Lukas Neumayer
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Chris Rodesch
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
70)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Joel Schwaerzler
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (372/216) | Win/Loss | 59% (264/185) |
| 60% (818/544) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (599/459) |
| 54% (6777/5802) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (5214/4699) |
| 54% (35/30) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (103/75) |
| 65% (336/182) | Clay Win/Loss | 62% (140/85) |
| 50% (1/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 49% (21/22) |
| 0% (0/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 1068 | Aces Total | 1137 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 1302 | Total Double Faults | 1054 |
| 1:41:21 | Average Match Time | 1:43:8 |
| 367.13 | Average Opponent Rank | 406.51 |
| 62% (23632/38125) | 1st Serve % | 59% (18113/30660) |
| 66% (15681/23632) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (12287/18113) |
| 50% (7174/14492) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (6455/12547) |
| 45% (2018/4471) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1377/3293) |
| 43% (16632/38714) | Return Points Win % | 41% (12724/30990) |
| 40% (8/12) | Slam W/L | 35% (6/11) |
| 41% (7/10) | Masters W/L | 45% (9/11) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 58% (7/5) |
| 49% (21/22) | Main Tour W/L | 32% (11/23) |
| 66% (190/100) | Challenger W/L | 60% (162/107) |
| 67% (146/72) | Futures W/L | 71% (69/28) |
| 64% (361/565) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (258/429) |
| 50% (7/14) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 8% (1/13) |
| 55% (81/147) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (61/129) |
| 59% (107/180) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (82/151) |
| 89% (343/305) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (261/221) |
| 10% (343/35) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (261/40) |
| 27% (245/66) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (188/43) |
Carabelli vs. Tseng Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
