Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Camilo UGO Carabelli vs Federico Iannaccone Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Carabelli vs Iannaccone analysis and find out who is favored!
Camilo UGO Carabelli vs Federico Iannaccone Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Carabelli has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Iannaccone has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Carabelli, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Iannaccone has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Carabelli has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Iannaccone has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Carabelli has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Iannaccone winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Carabelli has played against opponents with an average rank of while Iannaccone has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Carabelli has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Iannaccone has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Carabelli has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Iannaccone has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Carabelli 0 - 0 Iannaccone
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
R
Plays
Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Carabelli VS Iannaccone H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Camilo UGO Carabelli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
103)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
12%
(
2 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Orlando Luz
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
89)
85
Total Points Won
87
|
1-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
76%
(
50 of
66)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Nicolas Zanellato
77%
(
55 of
71)
1st Serve %
68%
(
57 of
84)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
22 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
84)
93
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 6-7(6) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
71%
(
64 of
90)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
2
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
1
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
85
Total Points Won
82
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Luis Britto
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve %
61%
(
20 of
33)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
6 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
35
Total Points Won
22
|
6-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
69%
(
45 of
65)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Daniel Cukierman
80%
(
71 of
89)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Alvaro Guillen Meza
68%
(
69 of
102)
1st Serve %
75%
(
62 of
83)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
94
Total Points Won
91
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Federico Iannaccone Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Andrea Picchione
Player
Federico Iannaccone
54%
(
46 of
85)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
85)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
48%
(
41 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
85
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 7-6(5) 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Nikola Milojevic
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Federico Iannaccone
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Merida Aguilar
Player
Federico Iannaccone
60%
(
65 of
108)
1st Serve %
70%
(
67 of
96)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
5
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
42%
(
45 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
48 of
96)
111
Total Points Won
93
|
6-3 6-7(7) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Toby Alex Kodat
72%
(
73 of
101)
1st Serve %
54%
(
42 of
78)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
41%
(
41 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
2-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Nick Chappell
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Federico Iannaccone
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
61
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Steven Diez
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
71%
(
75 of
106)
8
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
46 of
75)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
24%
(
5 of
21)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
52 of
106)
96
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Ignasi Forcano
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
60)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Liam Gavrielides
Player
Federico Iannaccone
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
79%
(
65 of
82)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
41 of
65)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(7) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Carabelli Vs Iannaccone Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
