S. Costoulas
To Win
C. Zanolini
To Win
Camilla Zanolini vs Sarah Iliev Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W W L W L
Form
L L W W L W L W L WHead-to-head: Zanolini 1 - 0 Iliev
They have played 3 sets in total, with Zanolini winning 2 and Iliev winning 1. The last match between Zanolini and Iliev was at the W15 Monastir, 19-02-2025, First, Hard with Camilla Zanolini getting the victory 1-6 6-4 6-1.
W15 Monastir(19-02-2025)
1
6
6
4
6
1
Upcoming Match
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
Upcoming Match
17 Mar 2025 / Q3
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Arnaldi VS Wu PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
19 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Vukic VS Goffin PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
19 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-6 6-4 6-1 | |||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
1
13
Games Won
11
0
Aces (Total)
0
0
Total Double Faults
0
0:0:0
Average Match Time
0:0:0
0% (0/0)
1st Serve %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Serve Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
2nd Serve Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Break Points Won % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Return Points Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (1/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (0/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Camilla Zanolini vs Sarah Iliev Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Camilla Zanolini 1 - 0 Sarah Iliev
Prediction Analysis in Tennis: Uncovering Insights for an Upcoming Match
Recent form unveils intriguing statistics about the performances of Zanolini and Iliev in the realm of second serve. Over the past six months, Zanolini has demonstrated superior prowess, winning 45.85% of points on their second serve, while Iliev trails behind with a success rate of 41.22%. The significance of this correlation between performance and match prediction accuracy cannot be understated.
An examination of return game statistics further sheds light on the situation. In recent form, Zanolini has triumphed in 58.31% of their opponent's second serve points, a commendable achievement. In comparison, Iliev has managed to secure victory in 56.52% of analogous situations. Comparable figures for first serve returns reveal percentages of 44.55% for Zanolini and 40.92% for Iliev. This enlightening data enables us to discern the favored player in this Head-to-Head (H2H) showdown.
The ability to perform effectively under pressure is a determining factor in the outcome of any match. Recent statistics indicate that Zanolini has successfully saved 55.47% of breakpoints, while Iliev has managed to save 54.03%. These figures, invaluable tools for in-game betting predictions, hold considerable value.
By inspecting the performance overview, we ascertain that Zanolini has emerged victorious in 66.18% of their matches over the past year (45 wins and 23 losses). In contrast, Iliev's triumphs amount to 48.72% of their matches played (19 wins and 20 losses). This comprehensive summary provides us with a compelling prediction overview.
When considering the players' best and worst surfaces, Zanolini shines brightest on Hard courts, capturing triumph in 64% of their matches (52 wins and 29 losses), whereas their success rate lowers to 50% (2 wins and 2 losses) on the I.hard surface. Iliev, on the other hand, thrives on Hard courts, registering an impressive victory rate of 61% (42 wins and 27 losses), while Clay courts pose the greatest challenge, leading to a more modest win rate of 48% (16 wins and 17 losses).
Player level is an influential factor to contemplate when predicting the favorite. Zanolini has predominantly participated in $10K Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, mustering victory in 67.86% of their matches (38 wins and 18 losses). In contrast, Iliev has primarily competed in Challenger/ITF tournaments with prize pools exceeding $10K, racking up wins in 51.72% of their matches (15 wins and 14 losses). It is essential to contextualize the statistical comparison based on the event levels at which the players have contended.
Differences in the quality of opponents faced also provide valuable insights. Zanolini has encountered adversaries with an average rank of 149.03 over the past 12 months, while Iliev has faced opponents with an average rank of 391.56.
For those keen on live predictions and betting, the performance of players in deciding sets becomes a focal point. Over the last year, Zanolini has emerged victorious in 42% of deciding sets, while Iliev has prevailed in 43% of all matches on the tour that have reached a deciding set.
While past player performance serves as a useful indicator for predicting tennis matches, it is imperative to consider current event statistics for players in good form during the ongoing event. Refer to the section below eventStats for pertinent information about players' recent performances. Certain individuals demonstrate heightened performance at specific events, warranting consideration when making predictions.
Break point conversion rates are noteworthy statistics to consider during live betting scenarios. Zanolini, in recent form, has effectively converted 50.6% of their breakpoint opportunities, whereas Iliev has capitalized on 49.17% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. These figures provide invaluable insight for in-game live betting tips whenever either player finds themselves in a breakpoint situation.
For those seeking models to predict tennis matches, this engaging article serves as an excellent resource. (Warning: intended for stats enthusiasts)
Camilla Zanolini Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Joanna Garland
Player
Camilla Zanolini
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve %
67%
(
26 of
39)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
65%
(
15 of
23)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
16 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilla Zanolini
Player
Anastasia Abbagnato
77%
(
64 of
83)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
0
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
6
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
39 of
50)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
11 of
41)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
97
Total Points Won
77
|
5-7 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Joanna Garland
Player
Camilla Zanolini
48%
(
13 of
27)
1st Serve %
50%
(
13 of
26)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
92%
(
12 of
13)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
6 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
36
Total Points Won
17
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilla Zanolini
Player
Hiromi Abe
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
34 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilla Zanolini
Player
Yuliya Hatouka
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
76%
(
31 of
41)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilla Zanolini
Player
Carola Cavelli
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
9
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| F | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| SF | 6-4 1-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| QF | 5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Sarah Iliev Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Sarah Iliev
Player
Ana Grubor
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
23 of
43)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
47
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alice Robbe
Player
Sarah Iliev
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sarah Iliev
Player
Giulia Morlet
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
14 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
51
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elena Milovanovic
Player
Sarah Iliev
68%
(
65 of
96)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
35%
(
11 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
88%
(
7 of
8)
48%
(
46 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
87)
92
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sarah Iliev
Player
Sapfo Sakellaridi
67%
(
68 of
102)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
4
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
6
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
44 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
95)
102
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 1-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Sarah Iliev
Player
Unknown Player
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
67%
(
24 of
36)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
47%
(
31 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Martha Matoula
Player
Sarah Iliev
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
83)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hiromi Abe
Player
Sarah Iliev
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
64%
(
28 of
44)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
55%
(
18 of
33)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
21 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
64% (110/61)
Win/Loss
56% (72/57)
62% (242/146)
Sets Win/Loss
54% (159/133)
56% (1983/1547)
Games Win/Loss
52% (1395/1293)
66% (57/29)
Hard Win/Loss
60% (44/29)
62% (46/28)
Clay Win/Loss
48% (16/17)
64% (7/4)
Indoor Hard W/L
52% (12/11)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.04
Aces Per Game
0.07
77
Aces Total
92
0.22
Double Faults Per Game
0.27
382
Total Double Faults
354
1:11:36
Average Match Time
1:12:56
337.9
Average Opponent Rank
418.81
71% (5728/8121)
1st Serve %
61% (4203/6868)
58% (3345/5728)
1st Serve Win %
59% (2461/4203)
44% (1050/2393)
2nd Serve Win %
43% (1150/2664)
52% (621/1200)
Break Points Won % (Total)
51% (438/858)
50% (4220/8388)
Return Points Win %
47% (3159/6717)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
67% (2/1)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
58% (19/14)
Challenger W/L
52% (34/32)
66% (91/47)
Futures W/L
61% (36/23)
64% (109/169)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
54% (68/125)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
100% (2/2)
54% (15/28)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
71% (15/21)
52% (25/48)
Deciding Set Win %
49% (17/35)
89% (106/94)
1st Set Won, Won Match
83% (69/57)
11% (106/12)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
17% (69/12)
25% (65/16)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
23% (60/14)
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Camilla Zanolini
View full predicted draw for Zanolini
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
