Camilla Zanolini vs Cindy Langlais Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W L L W L W L
Form
W W W L L W W L W LH2H: Zanolini 1 - 0 Langlais
They have played 2 sets in total, with Zanolini winning 2 and Langlais winning 0. The last match between Zanolini and Langlais was at the W15 Monastir, 20-02-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Hard, with Camilla Zanolini getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Camilla Zanolini | 1 |
| Cindy Langlais | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W15 Monastir(20-02-2025)
Camilla Zanolini
Cindy Langlais
6
3
6
2
| Zanolini | Stats | Langlais |
|---|---|---|
| 63% (17-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 62% (8-5) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 497 | Ranking | N/A |
| 497 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 22 | Age | 15 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 3 | Titles | 0 |
| 63% (113-65) | Career Total W/L | 55% (17-14) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Gauff VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome wta
17 May 2025 / Final
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sinner VS Paul PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome atp
16 May 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Zanolini vs Langlais Match Preview :
In the realm of recent performances, let us delve into the intriguing world of second serve prowess. Zanolini, within the last six months, has emerged victorious in a staggering 45.85% of points on their second serve, while Langlais has claimed victory in 33.33% of the same. One must not disregard the uncanny correlation between this statistical parameter and the accuracy of match predictions.
Let us now turn our attention to the alluring realm of return games. Recent return statistics unveil Zanolini's admirable achievement of winning 58.31% of their opponent's second serve points, pitted against Langlais' commendable record of seizing 66.67%. Additionally, the figures for first serve returns stand at 44.55% and 44.68% respectively. These numbers hold great significance in assessing the favored individual in this momentous head-to-head clash.
In the face of dire pressure, Zanolini has exhibited an astonishing ability to save 55.47% of breakpoints in their recent form. In stark contrast, Langlais has dishearteningly failed to save even a single opportunity, amounting to a grand total of 0%. Such a statistic holds paramount importance when it comes to making daring predictions during the exhilarating course of the game.
Observing the broader picture, Zanolini has emerged triumphant in 66.67% of matches played in the past year (with an impressive win-loss ratio of 46/23), whereas Langlais boasts a respectable 53.85% success rate (with a win-loss ratio of 7/6). These figures contribute to a comprehensive view of the anticipated outcome in this monumental tête-à-tête.
Let us now explore the enchanting realm of surfaces. Zanolini's most astounding triumphs have been witnessed on the demanding Hard surfaces, wherein they have emerged victorious in an astounding 65% of matches played (with an awe-inspiring win-loss ratio of 53/29). Conversely, their performance on the treacherous I.hard surfaces has been less impressive, claiming a mere 50% win rate (with a win-loss ratio of 2/2). On the other hand, Langlais has proven to be an unbeatable force on the Hard surfaces, reveling in a flawless victory ratio of 100% (with a win-loss record of 1/0). However, the treacherous Clay surface has proved to be Langlais' Achilles heel with a less impressive win percentage of 50% (with a win-loss ratio of 9/9).
When assessing the players' respective levels, one cannot help but appreciate Zanolini's penchant for engaging in matches primarily within the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K. Remarkably, Zanolini has emerged victorious in a remarkable 68.42% of matches played in these tournaments (with a commendable win-loss record of 39/18). In comparison, Langlais has also immersed themselves in the chaos of the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K and has emerged successful in 58.33% of matches (with a win-loss ratio of 7/5). To predict the favorite, one must consider the relative level of the events the players have participated in.
Gauging the quality of opponents faced, Zanolini has confronted adversaries with an average ranking of 398.57 over the past year. Conversely, Langlais has encountered opponents boasting a slightly higher average ranking of 122.15.
In the event of a nail-biting concluding set, Zanolini has a rather decent record of winning 45% of such deciders over the last 12 months. In contrast, Langlais has notched up a slightly higher success rate of 50% in all matches played on the tour. A crucial factor to consider for those keenly invested in live predictions and thrilling betting endeavors.
While past player performances hold a wealth of information for tennis match predictions, we must also take into account the current event stats to glean insights into an individual's current form. Consequently, it would be wise to peruse the subsequent section (if the players have had the opportunity to engage in a match during the current event). Additionally, it is noteworthy to mention that certain players exhibit exceptional prowess in specific events, and this aspect must be duly acknowledged in order to gauge the ultimate outcome.
Lastly, let us not overlook the captivating realm of break point conversion. Recent form suggests that Zanolini has astoundingly converted 50.6% of their breakpoint opportunities, whereas Langlais, no slacker themselves, has achieved a commendable 45.45% success rate in breaking their opponents' serve. These statistics serve as a profound source of wisdom for in-game betting tips, particularly when faced with the tantalizing prospect of a breakpoint opportunity.
Zanolini vs Langlais Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Camilla Zanolini Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Luca Udvardy
Player
Camilla Zanolini
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
71%
(
49 of
69)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
41 of
69)
82
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Camilla Zanolini
Player
Lucie Pawlak
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lina Glushko
Player
Camilla Zanolini
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
0
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
93
Total Points Won
71
|
5-7 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilla Zanolini
Player
Lea Tholey
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
43 of
78)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
78)
74
Total Points Won
71
|
6-1 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hikaru Sato
Player
Camilla Zanolini
62%
(
67 of
108)
1st Serve %
79%
(
73 of
92)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
40 of
73)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
49 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
92)
106
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federica Di Sarra
Player
Camilla Zanolini
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve %
50%
(
8 of
16)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
50%
(
9 of
18)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
50%
(
13 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
21
Total Points Won
21
|
7-6(2) 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilla Zanolini
Player
Sofia Costoulas
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
61%
(
20 of
33)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
13 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
36
Total Points Won
31
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joanna Garland
Player
Camilla Zanolini
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve %
67%
(
26 of
39)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
65%
(
15 of
23)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
16 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Cindy Langlais Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Camilla Rosatello
Player
Cindy Langlais
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cindy Langlais
Player
Manon Leonard
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alice Robbe
Player
Cindy Langlais
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
99)
2
Aces
0
13
Double Faults
2
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
32%
(
11 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
52%
(
44 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
54 of
99)
94
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cindy Langlais
Player
Ely Cordonnier
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Cindy Langlais
Player
Lola Collin
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
74%
(
31 of
42)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristina Kroitor
Player
Cindy Langlais
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
80%
(
40 of
50)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
14 of
40)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilla Gennaro
Player
Cindy Langlais
59%
(
52 of
88)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
95)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
92
Total Points Won
91
|
6-3 2-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cindy Langlais
Player
Dominika Podhajecka
74%
(
62 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
57 of
85)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
50%
(
31 of
62)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
48%
(
40 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (113/65) | Win/Loss | 55% (17/14) |
| 62% (250/155) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (38/32) |
| 56% (2055/1631) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (356/336) |
| 66% (58/30) | Hard Win/Loss | 71% (5/2) |
| 61% (47/30) | Clay Win/Loss | 50% (12/12) |
| 62% (8/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 82 | Aces Total | 4 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 405 | Total Double Faults | 33 |
| 1:11:27 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 337.75 | Average Opponent Rank | 163.26 |
| 70% (6005/8519) | 1st Serve % | 69% (739/1073) |
| 58% (3505/6005) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (388/739) |
| 44% (1098/2514) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (161/334) |
| 51% (644/1258) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (69/140) |
| 50% (4430/8861) | Return Points Win % | 48% (509/1062) |
| 55% (22/18) | Challenger W/L | 33% (1/2) |
| 66% (91/47) | Futures W/L | 57% (16/12) |
| 63% (111/175) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (17/31) |
| 53% (16/30) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (4/7) |
| 50% (26/52) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (4/8) |
| 88% (110/97) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (17/15) |
| 12% (110/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (17/2) |
| 24% (68/16) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (14/2) |
Zanolini vs. Langlais Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
