C. Hemery
To Win
F. C. Jianu
To Win
Calvin Hemery vs Moise Kouame Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L L W W W W L
Form
L L L L L L L W L LH2H: Hemery 1 - 0 Kouame
They have played 3 sets in total, with Hemery winning 2 and Kouame winning 1. The last match between Hemery and Kouame was at the Bordeaux Challenger, 12-05-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Clay, with Calvin Hemery getting the victory 5-7 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Calvin Hemery | 1 |
| Moise Kouame | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Bordeaux Challenger(12-05-2025)
Calvin Hemery
Moise Kouame
5
7
6
4
6
4
| Hemery | Stats | Kouame |
|---|---|---|
| 52% (22-20) | YTD Win/Loss | 54% (15-13) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 178 | Ranking | 828 |
| 116 | Highest Rank | 828 |
| 30 | Age | 16 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 9 | Titles | 0 |
| 58% (411-295) | Career Total W/L | 52% (16-15) |
| $236,675 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
08 Jul 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sinner VS Shelton PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
09 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Swiatek VS Samsonova PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
09 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Calvin Hemery
Player
Moise Kouame
65%
(
72 of
111)
1st Serve %
46%
(
44 of
96)
7
Aces
7
8
Double Faults
5
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
36%
(
40 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
96)
106
Total Points Won
101
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 17 | Games Won | 15 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 2:28:26 | Average Match Time | 2:28:26 |
| 65% (72/111) | 1st Serve % | 46% (44/96) |
| 71% (51/72) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (32/44) |
| 51% (20/39) | 2nd Serve Win % | 56% (29/52) |
| 50% (4/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (3/12) |
| 36% (35/96) | Return Points Win % | 36% (40/111) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Hemery vs Kouame Match Preview :
- Kouame has a slight edge on second serve performance recently, winning 46.22% of points compared to Hemery's 45.62%. Does this small difference matter? It could, given the high correlation with match outcomes.
- In return games, Kouame also leads slightly, having won 47.5% of their opponent's second serve points versus Hemery's 44.03%. This could give Kouame an advantage in breaking serve.
- Concerning first serve return stats, Kouame excels with 26.67% while Hemery achieves 22.55%, highlighting Kouame's stronger return game.
- Under pressure, Kouame saves 52.2% of breakpoints compared to Hemery’s 51.36%, which might be pivotal during crucial points.
- Kouame boasts a higher win rate over the past year at 60%, overshadowing Hemery's 56.16%. Is this a strong indicator? It contributes to Kouame’s favorability.
- Hemery performs best on Clay with a 61% win rate, while grass is their weakest at 40%. Kouame excels on hard courts with a 75% win rate.
- In terms of tournament level, Hemery frequently competes in Challengers/ITF tournaments, winning 60% of matches, whereas Kouame, in Futures/Satellites, holds a higher 70% win rate.
- The quality of opponents also matter. Hemery faces tougher opponents with an average rank of 255.78, slightly higher than Kouame’s 285.8. Could this impact the result? Possibly, if Kouame is not used to high-pressure matches.
- Regarding deciding sets, Kouame's record is better, winning 70% compared to Hemery’s 63%, which could be crucial if the match extends to the final set.
- Kouame's breakpoint conversion is superior at 34.88%, giving them a potential edge in crucial match moments compared to Hemery’s 29.91% conversion rate.
Editorial Prediction (May 12, 2025, UTC):
In this upcoming match, the subtle statistical advantages favor Kouame. Their superior performance in second serve and return games provides a stronger foundation for winning points. Even though the differences in these stats might seem small, they are crucial for predicting outcomes.
Kouame's consistent performance under pressure, coupled with their higher breakpoint conversion rate, suggests they have a better ability to capitalize on crucial moments during the match. Their strong showing in deciding sets furthers their case as a formidable opponent.
While Hemery competes against slightly higher-ranked opponents, which could be an indicator of high match intensity experience, Kouame's higher win rate over the last year showcases their current quality and form.
Based on these data points, Kouame is more likely to secure the win in the forthcoming match, leveraging their recent advantageous stats in key areas.
Hemery vs Kouame Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Calvin Hemery Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Calvin Hemery
65%
(
64 of
99)
1st Serve %
47%
(
51 of
108)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
66%
(
23 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
33 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
108)
109
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Jacopo Berrettini
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
47%
(
39 of
83)
3
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
4
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
44%
(
30 of
68)
6
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Mika Brunold
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve %
53%
(
37 of
70)
3
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
5
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
70)
79
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 0-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Kalin Ivanovski
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
47%
(
37 of
79)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
21 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Calvin Hemery
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
78%
(
66 of
85)
6
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
39 of
66)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
18 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
85)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Calvin Hemery
42%
(
39 of
92)
1st Serve %
50%
(
39 of
78)
3
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
58%
(
31 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
35%
(
32 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
78)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Cedrik-Marcel Stebe
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
43%
(
24 of
56)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Moise Kouame Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriele Pennaforti
Player
Moise Kouame
58%
(
54 of
93)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
4
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
7
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
39 of
50)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
35 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
29 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
91
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Denis Petak
Player
Moise Kouame
72%
(
56 of
78)
1st Serve %
54%
(
41 of
76)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Moise Kouame
Player
Noah Schlagenhauf
56%
(
54 of
97)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
4
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
3
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
36%
(
35 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
6-1 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Abel Forger
Player
Moise Kouame
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve %
52%
(
39 of
75)
7
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
31 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 | 2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Moise Kouame
64%
(
72 of
113)
1st Serve %
52%
(
44 of
84)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
35 of
44)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
47 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
84)
98
Total Points Won
99
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Moise Kouame
65%
(
72 of
111)
1st Serve %
46%
(
44 of
96)
7
Aces
7
8
Double Faults
5
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
36%
(
40 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
96)
106
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (411/295) | Win/Loss | 52% (16/15) |
| 57% (923/700) | Sets Win/Loss | 50% (38/38) |
| 53% (8177/7389) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (375/346) |
| 60% (95/64) | Hard Win/Loss | 75% (6/2) |
| 61% (218/142) | Clay Win/Loss | 44% (8/10) |
| 53% (96/85) | Indoor Hard W/L | 40% (2/3) |
| 33% (2/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.47 | Aces Per Game | 0.3 |
| 3603 | Aces Total | 105 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 2308 | Total Double Faults | 97 |
| 1:21:2 | Average Match Time | 1:43:50 |
| 513.12 | Average Opponent Rank | 301.55 |
| 62% (25253/40838) | 1st Serve % | 61% (1300/2138) |
| 72% (18180/25253) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (899/1300) |
| 50% (7735/15585) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (413/838) |
| 40% (1587/3950) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (83/180) |
| 39% (15985/41335) | Return Points Win % | 39% (830/2116) |
| 33% (10/20) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 50% (2/2) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 45% (19/23) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (207/171) | Challenger W/L | 20% (1/4) |
| 69% (173/79) | Futures W/L | 63% (15/9) |
| 59% (406/685) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (15/30) |
| 13% (1/8) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (133/250) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (4/7) |
| 55% (119/218) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (8/15) |
| 87% (412/359) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 78% (18/14) |
| 13% (412/52) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 22% (18/4) |
| 18% (293/52) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (13/2) |
Hemery vs. Kouame Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
