M. Ymer
To Win
B. Harris
To Win
Calvin Hemery vs Mikael Ymer Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W W L L W W L
Form
W W W W W L W L W LHead-to-head: Hemery 1 - 2 Ymer
They have played 8 sets in total, with Hemery winning 4 and Ymer winning 4. The last match between Hemery and Ymer was at the Brazzaville Challenger, 19-02-2025, Second, Clay with Calvin Hemery getting the victory 7-6(5) 2-6 6-2.
Brazzaville Challenger(19-02-2025)
7
6
2
6
6
2
Upcoming Match
17 Mar 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Napolitano VS Schoolkate PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
17 Mar 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Arnaldi VS Wu PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
19 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 2-6 6-2 |
Stats 
Calvin Hemery
Player
Mikael Ymer
63%
(
57 of
91)
1st Serve %
65%
(
63 of
97)
14
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
48 of
63)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
29 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
97)
94
Total Points Won
94
|
||||
| 6-4 3-6 6-2 |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Calvin Hemery
65%
(
60 of
93)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
35%
(
33 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
90
Total Points Won
85
|
||||
| 6-7(1) 6-2 5-5 ret. |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Calvin Hemery
66%
(
74 of
112)
1st Serve %
63%
(
63 of
100)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
10
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
44 of
63)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
10 of
37)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
50 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
100)
108
Total Points Won
104
|
||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
2
4
Sets Won
4
41
Games Won
46
22
Aces (Total)
4
18
Total Double Faults
7
2:43:10
Average Match Time
2:43:10
61% (167/273)
1st Serve %
65% (197/302)
74% (123/167)
1st Serve Win %
68% (134/197)
42% (45/106)
2nd Serve Win %
50% (53/105)
25% (7/28)
Break Points Won % (Total)
46% (11/24)
38% (115/302)
Return Points Win %
38% (105/273)
50% (1/2)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
50% (1/2)
0% (0/1)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
100% (1/1)
100% (2/2)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/2)
50% (1/2)
Deciding Set Win %
50% (1/2)
50% (2/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
100% (1/1)
0% (2/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (1/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (2/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Calvin Hemery vs Mikael Ymer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Calvin Hemery 1 - 2 Mikael Ymer
- Analysis of Second Serve Performance: In observing their recent form over the past six months, it appears that Hemery has demonstrated exceptional prowess on their second serve, winning 54.35% of points. Conversely, Ymer has achieved a commendable success rate of 50.86%. It is worth noting that there exists a close correlation between the performance in this specific aspect and the accuracy of match predictions.
- Examination of Return Game Statistics: Focusing on return game stats, Hemery has displayed remarkable proficiency in recent matches, conquering 49.83% of their opponent's second serve points. Comparatively, Ymer has exhibited even greater skill, triumphing in 57.51% of similar situations. Furthermore, when analyzing first serve returns, Hemery boasts a 27.17% success rate, while Ymer impresses with a 37.37% success rate. These figures hold considerable influence in determining the favored player in their head-to-head encounter.
- Scrutinizing Performance Under Pressure: A significant factor to consider is the ability to save breakpoints during crucial moments in the game. Hemery has effectively saved 67.35% of breakpoints in recent matches, mirroring Ymer's impressive rate of 67.19%. This statistic proves invaluable for those seeking insights into in-game betting predictions.
- Overview of Overall Performance: Considering the past year, Hemery has emerged victorious in 56% of matches played, resulting in a win-loss record of 42/33. Ymer has surmounted his opponents with great triumph, boasting an impressive 77.78% win rate (W/L 7/2). These figures grant us a comprehensive prediction overview regarding their head-to-head encounter.
- Identifying Preferred Surfaces: Hemery showcases exceptional prowess on clay courts, amassing a 61% career surface win rate (W/L 200/129). However, their performance on grass courts falters in comparison, with a modest 40% win rate (W/L 2/3). In contrast, Ymer thrives on indoor hard courts, besting his opponents with a 68% career surface win rate (W/L 110/51). Conversely, Ymer's success on grass courts is slightly less pronounced, as he secures victories in 52% of matches (W/L 13/12).
- Assessing Player Level: Within the past year, Hemery has predominantly engaged in matches within the Challenger/ITF tournaments, boasting a commendable 60.29% success rate (W/L 41/27). Conversely, Ymer primarily participates in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a prize pool of $10,000. Impressively, Ymer remains undefeated in these matches, securing victories in all five contests (W/L 5/0). When comparing statistics between players to predict the favored competitor, one must bear in mind the relative event level they have been participating in.
- Exploration of Direct Head-to-Head Matches: In their previous encounters, Hemery and Ymer have faced each other on two occasions. Regrettably, Hemery has yet to secure a victory, as Ymer has emerged triumphant in both instances. A total of five sets have been contested between them, resulting in Hemery winning two sets and Ymer seizing three sets. The most recent showdown took place at the Bastad Challenger on 11th July 2018, transpiring on clay courts. Ymer claimed victory, ultimately prevailing with a score of 6-4, 3-6, 6-2.
- Analyzing Duration of Head-to-Head Matches: Throughout their previous encounters, the average match duration between these formidable opponents has been recorded as 2 hours, 48 minutes, and 21 seconds.
- Predicting Deciding Set Outcomes: A crucial aspect to consider is their performance in deciding sets. Hemery and Ymer have engaged in one decider, with Hemery failing to secure a victory, whereas Ymer has emerged triumphant on each occasion. This information proves highly valuable when attempting to predict the outcome of a match that reaches its climax.
- Examining Head-to-Head Extreme Pressure Situations: The intensity of their matches has led to one tiebreak thus far, favoring Hemery as the victor in that single occurrence, while Ymer has yet to secure a win in such high-pressure scenarios.
- Evaluation of Opponent Quality: Over the course of the previous year, Hemery has consistently faced opponents with an average ranking of 260.15. In comparison, Ymer has encountered players with an average ranking of 303.11.
- Deciding Set Performance versus All Players: When assessing the outcomes of deciding sets throughout the past 12 months, Hemery has emerged victorious in an impressive 59% of matches, truly showcasing their mettle in these intense situations. On the other hand, Ymer has maintained a perfect record, triumphing in 100% of matches played on the tour.
- Scrutinizing Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: While analyzing past player performance proves helpful in predicting tennis matches, it becomes essential to shift focus towards current event statistics as the tournament unfolds. These up-to-date figures provide valuable insights into the form and competence of a player during the event. Please consult the section below for further information if the players have already competed in the ongoing event. Additionally, it should be noted that certain players may exhibit superior performance at specific events, a factor that should be considered when forecasting the final outcomes.
- Delving into Break Point Conversion: Recent performance analysis illustrates Hemery's ability to efficiently convert 40.54% of breakpoint opportunities, showcasing their skill in crucial moments. Ymer follows suit, successfully converting 44.71% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. These figures prove invaluable for those seeking in-game live betting tips whenever either player faces a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are intrigued by models that accurately predict tennis matches, exploring this article would be an enlightening starting point (Warning: Intended for statistics enthusiasts).
Calvin Hemery Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Calvin Hemery
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
6
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
8
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
6-7(3) 6-0 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Corentin Denolly
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
11 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Yanki Erel
51%
(
38 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
12
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
23 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maximilian Neuchrist
Player
Calvin Hemery
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve %
46%
(
17 of
37)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
12 of
17)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
43
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Calvin Hemery
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
7
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
87%
(
27 of
31)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
19 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Maximus Jones
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
11
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
93%
(
25 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Franco Agamenone
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Mikael Ymer
63%
(
57 of
91)
1st Serve %
65%
(
63 of
97)
14
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
48 of
63)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
29 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
97)
94
Total Points Won
94
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Calvin Hemery
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
23 of
43)
9
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
0
96%
(
26 of
27)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Calvin Hemery
72%
(
58 of
81)
1st Serve %
73%
(
77 of
105)
9
Aces
15
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
61 of
77)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
17 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
34 of
105)
98
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(2) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Mikael Ymer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Mikael Ymer
63%
(
57 of
91)
1st Serve %
65%
(
63 of
97)
14
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
48 of
63)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
29 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
97)
94
Total Points Won
94
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Julien De Cuyper
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Mikael Ymer
68%
(
59 of
87)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
83)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Viktor Durasovic
65%
(
65 of
100)
1st Serve %
59%
(
64 of
108)
4
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
5
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
108)
106
Total Points Won
102
|
6-3 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| F |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
57%
(
50 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
9
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
89
Total Points Won
72
|
6-1 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Daniil Glinka
61%
(
59 of
96)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
90)
2
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
70%
(
26 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
32 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
90)
97
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(2) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Norbert Gombos
65%
(
68 of
105)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
98)
0
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
5
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
30%
(
11 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
50%
(
52 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
98)
99
Total Points Won
104
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Markus Molder
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
58% (398/284)
Win/Loss
63% (284/168)
57% (894/674)
Sets Win/Loss
58% (644/467)
53% (7904/7119)
Games Win/Loss
53% (5552/4988)
60% (95/64)
Hard Win/Loss
61% (59/37)
61% (205/132)
Clay Win/Loss
60% (101/67)
53% (96/85)
Indoor Hard W/L
68% (111/52)
40% (2/3)
Grass Win/Loss
52% (13/12)
0.47
Aces Per Game
0.18
3484
Aces Total
935
0.3
Double Faults Per Game
0.24
2217
Total Double Faults
1237
1st Match
Average Match Time
1:37:50
508.14
Average Opponent Rank
418.64
62% (24149/39050)
1st Serve %
66% (20427/30748)
72% (17407/24149)
1st Serve Win %
65% (13338/20427)
50% (7393/14901)
2nd Serve Win %
48% (5003/10321)
40% (1530/3792)
Break Points Won % (Total)
44% (1464/3304)
39% (15339/39584)
Return Points Win %
42% (12589/30235)
36% (10/18)
Slam W/L
53% (19/17)
50% (2/2)
Masters W/L
50% (12/12)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
67% (16/8)
45% (18/22)
Main Tour W/L
50% (59/58)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
54% (195/163)
Challenger W/L
68% (122/57)
69% (173/79)
Futures W/L
78% (56/16)
59% (393/661)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
64% (265/411)
13% (1/8)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
48% (16/33)
53% (129/243)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
50% (59/119)
55% (115/211)
Deciding Set Win %
65% (109/167)
87% (399/347)
1st Set Won, Won Match
89% (251/223)
13% (399/51)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
11% (251/27)
18% (282/51)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
29% (201/59)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
