Calvin Hemery vs Mika Brunold Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 03 Jul at 03:41 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Hemery vs M. Brunold

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

SUI
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Hemery 1 - 0 Brunold
They have played 3 sets in total, with Calvin Hemery winning 2 and Mika Brunold winning 1. The last match between Calvin Hemery and Mika Brunold was at the Troyes Challenger, 03-07-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Calvin Hemery getting the victory 6-2 0-6 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hemery | 1 |
| Brunold | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Troyes Challenger(07-03-25)
C. Hemery vs M. Brunold H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $243,065 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 57.63% (419-308) | Career Total W/L | 57.36% (113-84) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 9 | Titles | 4 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. Hemery vs M. Brunold Match Preview:
- In recent form, Hemery has a higher second serve winning percentage (46.33%) compared to Brunold (40.83%). Could this give Hemery an advantage in the match? Yes, it could be a decisive factor.
- Brunold, however, surpasses Hemery in returning abilities, especially on the first serve returns with a success rate of 26.45% versus Hemery’s 21.97%.
- Under pressure, Hemery has a slight edge in saving breakpoints with a rate of 54.41% compared to Brunold's 52.26%.
- Looking at the performance overview for the last year, Brunold boasts a higher match win percentage at 62.32%, as opposed to Hemery's 56.76%.
- On their favorite surface, both players excel on clay, each with a winning rate of 60%.
- At the competitive level of Challengers/ITF tournaments, Hemery has a slight advantage with a 61.54% win rate, while Brunold has a 59.18% win rate.
- Examining opponent quality over the past year, Hemery has faced stronger competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 267.39 against Brunold's 389.59.
- In deciding sets, Hemery is significantly more successful, winning 65% compared to Brunold's 38%.
- Crucially, Brunold demonstrates superior break-point conversion, achieving a 34.57% success rate versus Hemery's 26.76%.
Editorial Prediction (July 3, 2025, UTC):
Considering their current form, Hemery’s strong performance on second serves could provide him with a crucial edge. Although Brunold shows better return stats, Hemery’s ability to withstand pressure might be pivotal.
While Brunold has a better overall match win percentage in the past year, Hemery’s experience against higher-ranked opponents demonstrates his capability to compete at a tougher level.
Although Brunold excels in break-point conversion, Hemery’s proficiency in deciding sets may tip the scale in his favor, especially in a closely contested match.
Given these insights, Hemery appears to be the more likely winner for the upcoming match, as his combination of resilience and experience might prove decisive in overcoming Brunold.
Calvin Hemery vs Mika Brunold Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Hemery vs M. Brunold H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 12 | Games Won | 11 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 10 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:57:36 | Average Match Time | 1:57:36 |
| 53% (46/86) | 1st Serve % | 53% (37/70) |
| 76% (35/46) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (27/37) |
| 43% (17/40) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (16/33) |
| 38% (3/8) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (3/12) |
| 39% (27/70) | Return Points Win % | 40% (34/86) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Hemery Recent Matches Played
M. Brunold Recent Matches Played

C. Hemery vs M. Brunold Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.63% (419/308) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.36% (113/84) |
| 56.42% (940/726) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.26% (256/199) |
| 52.37% (8363/7606) | Games Win/Loss | 52.22% (2262/2070) |
| 58.79% (97/68) | Hard Win/Loss | 43.75% (7/9) |
| 60.38% (221/145) | Clay Win/Loss | 58.12% (68/49) |
| 52.11% (99/91) | Indoor Hard W/L | 59.38% (38/26) |
| 33.33% (2/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.48 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
| 3742 | Aces Total | 467 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.34 |
| 2375 | Total Double Faults | 716 |
| 1:21:10 | Average Match Time | 1:46:19 |
| 526.01 | Average Opponent Rank | 190.64 |
| 62% (26127/42202) | 1st Serve % | 60% (8104/13528) |
| 72% (18816/26127) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (5404/8104) |
| 49% (7936/16075) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (2677/5424) |
| 40% (1614/4013) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (641/1472) |
| 38% (16350/42493) | Return Points Win % | 42% (5709/13654) |
| 32.26% (10/21) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (2/2) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 45.65% (21/25) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/6) |
| 54.06% (213/181) | Challenger W/L | 57.83% (48/35) |
| 68.65% (173/79) | Futures W/L | 60.19% (65/43) |
| 59% (413/703) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (109/193) |
| 13% (1/8) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 53% (135/255) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (39/66) |
| 55% (121/222) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (29/61) |
| 87% (421/367) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (110/93) |
| 13% (421/53) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (110/17) |
| 17% (305/52) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (87/20) |