Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Calum Puttergill vs George Loffhagen Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Puttergill vs Loffhagen analysis and find out who is favored!
Calum Puttergill vs George Loffhagen Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Puttergill has won 48.45% of points on his second serve, while Loffhagen has won 58.29%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Puttergill, in recent form, has won 55.11% of his opponent's second serve points, while Loffhagen has won 48.51%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.99% and 32.4% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Puttergill has saved 50% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Loffhagen has saved 47.83% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Puttergill has won 37.04% of matches played (W/L 10/ 17), with Loffhagen winning 63.89% (W/L 23/ 13) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Puttergill has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 38/ 33), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Loffhagen has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 65% (W/L 32/ 17), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 30% (W/L 3/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Puttergill has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 36% of matches (W/L 9/ 16), where as Loffhagen has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 70% of matches (W/L 21/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Puttergill winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Puttergill winning 2 and Loffhagen winning 0. The last match between Puttergill and Loffhagen was at the M25 Darwin, 26-09-2019, Second, Hard with Calum Puttergill getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:57:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Puttergill and Loffhagen have played a deciding set 0 times, with Puttergill winning 0 times and Loffhagen 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Puttergill winning 0, and Loffhagen 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Puttergill has played against opponents with an average rank of 187.52 while Loffhagen has played against players with an average rank of 260.11.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Puttergill has won 30% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Loffhagen has won 30% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Puttergill has converted 51.22% of breakpoint opportunities, and Loffhagen has converted 43.48% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Puttergill 1 - 0 Loffhagen
879
Rank
663
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
441
Rank
333
High
23
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
50% (170-172)
Career Total W/L
61% (137-86)
50% (3-3)
YTD W/L
50% (3-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Puttergill VS Loffhagen H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Calum Puttergill | George Loffhagen |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:57:0 | 1:57:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (56/83) | 62% (39/63) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 61% (34/56) | 51% (20/39) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (14/27) | 54% (13/24) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (5/5) | 33% (3/9) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (30/63) | 42% (35/83) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Puttergill VS Loffhagen H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-4 |
Stats 
Calum Puttergill
Player
George Loffhagen
67%
(
56 of
83)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
35 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Calum Puttergill | George Loffhagen |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (3/3) | 50% (3/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (9/7) | 69% (9/4) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (71/69) | 55% (68/56) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 50% (2/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.43 | 0.45 |
| Aces Total | 29 | 27 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 18 | 12 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:52 | 1:49:40 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 172.83 | 60.83 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (282/442) | 63% (240/379) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (184/282) | 73% (176/240) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (77/160) | 58% (81/139) |
| BPs Won% Total | 57% (23/40) | 43% (16/37) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (198/458) | 40% (167/418) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (3/6) | 60% (3/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 25% (1/4) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (4/3) | 80% (5/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (4/1) | 20% (5/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Calum Puttergill Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Andre Ilagan
Player
Calum Puttergill
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
62 of
94)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
94)
88
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Calum Puttergill
Player
Moerani Bouzige
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Calum Puttergill
Player
Kokoro Isomura
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mitchell Harper
Player
Calum Puttergill
66%
(
67 of
101)
1st Serve %
58%
(
55 of
95)
3
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
7
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
40 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
104
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hiroki Moriya
Player
Calum Puttergill
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
3
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
87)
101
Total Points Won
80
|
5-7 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Calum Puttergill
Player
Preston Brown
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
46%
(
26 of
56)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Calum Puttergill
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
8
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
86)
93
Total Points Won
63
|
4-6 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Calum Puttergill
Player
Kazuki Nishiwaki
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ajeet Rai
Player
Calum Puttergill
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
12
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
7
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
39%
(
35 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
92
Total Points Won
77
|
6-1 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pavle Marinkov
Player
Calum Puttergill
52%
(
51 of
98)
1st Serve %
73%
(
67 of
92)
7
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
38 of
67)
43%
(
20 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
101
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
George Loffhagen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
George Loffhagen
69%
(
79 of
115)
1st Serve %
68%
(
79 of
116)
1
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
57 of
79)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
42 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
37 of
116)
110
Total Points Won
121
|
3-6 7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Henrique Rocha
Player
George Loffhagen
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Rigele Te
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
8 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
7-5 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Henry Searle
Player
George Loffhagen
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve %
60%
(
9 of
15)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
12 of
18)
1st Serve Won
100%
(
9 of
9)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
44%
(
12 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
17
Total Points Won
25
|
3-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Michael Shaw
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
96%
(
26 of
27)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
10 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
George Loffhagen
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Johannes Seeman
47%
(
22 of
47)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
56
Total Points Won
42
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Oliver Tarvet
Player
George Loffhagen
64%
(
80 of
125)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
45 of
63)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
39%
(
49 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
31 of
99)
107
Total Points Won
117
|
4-6 7-6(7) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Patrick Brady
52%
(
41 of
79)
1st Serve %
75%
(
64 of
85)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
37%
(
14 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
44%
(
35 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
83
Total Points Won
81
|
6-2 7-6(13) | H2H | ||
view more
Puttergill Vs Loffhagen Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
