Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Calin Manda vs Vitaliy Sachko Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Manda vs Sachko analysis and find out who is favored!
Calin Manda vs Vitaliy Sachko Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Manda has won 54.91% of points on his second serve, while Sachko has won 48.73%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Manda, in recent form, has won 49.3% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sachko has won 49.3%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.87% and 32.12% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Manda has saved 57.78% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sachko has saved 65.41% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Manda has won 53.85% of matches played (W/L 28/ 24), with Sachko winning 54.55% (W/L 36/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Manda has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 195/ 157), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Sachko has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 185/ 129), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Manda has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 53.85% of matches (W/L 28/ 24), where as Sachko has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.77% of matches (W/L 29/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Manda winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Manda winning 0 and Sachko winning 2. The last match between Manda and Sachko was at the M15 Curtea de Arges, 16-09-2020, First, Clay with Vitaliy Sachko getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:31:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Manda and Sachko have played a deciding set 0 times, with Manda winning 0 times and Sachko 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Manda winning 0, and Sachko 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Manda has played against opponents with an average rank of 224.27 while Sachko has played against players with an average rank of 251.71.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Manda has won 36% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sachko has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Manda has converted 51.96% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sachko has converted 43.4% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Manda 0 - 1 Sachko
798
Rank
607
High
26
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
181
Rank
156
High
26
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
54% (216-182)
Career Total W/L
58% (303-217)
29% (2-5)
YTD W/L
45% (5-6)
$0
Career Prize Money
$154,400
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Calin Manda | Vitaliy Sachko |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 7 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:31:0 | 1:31:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 51% (38/74) | 60% (33/55) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 66% (25/38) | 85% (28/33) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (17/36) | 64% (14/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 43% (3/7) |
| Return Points W% | 24% (13/55) | 43% (32/74) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 7-5 |
Stats 
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Calin Manda
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
74)
3
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Calin Manda | Vitaliy Sachko |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 29% (2/5) | 45% (5/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 29% (5/12) | 45% (10/12) |
| Games Win/Loss | 42% (66/91) | 51% (110/106) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 29% (2/5) | 40% (2/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.26 | 0.22 |
| Aces Total | 20 | 23 |
| DFs per game | 0.29 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 22 | 21 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:29:34 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 120.29 | 395.82 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (310/471) | 64% (481/755) |
| 1st Serve W% | 59% (182/310) | 65% (312/481) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (78/161) | 48% (132/274) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (17/38) | 42% (33/78) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (170/474) | 41% (286/700) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
| Futures W/L | 29% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 29% (2/7) | 56% (5/9) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 25% (1/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 100% (4/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (4/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (5/0) | 14% (7/1) |
Calin Manda Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Stefan Adrian Andreescu
Player
Calin Manda
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
82
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bogdan Pavel
Player
Calin Manda
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
79%
(
44 of
56)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Calin Manda
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
75%
(
39 of
52)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calin Manda
Player
Michel Hopp
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
6
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Calin Manda
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
8
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
4
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calin Manda
Player
Sarp Agabigun
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
48%
(
39 of
81)
6
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
7
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
31 of
39)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Attila Boros
Player
Calin Manda
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rafael Giotis
Player
Calin Manda
49%
(
41 of
84)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
8
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
0
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
45 of
60)
63%
(
27 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
26 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
30 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
87
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Calin Manda
Player
Corentin Denolly
52%
(
54 of
103)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
57%
(
28 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
43%
(
44 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
91)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 6-7(5) 10-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calin Manda
Player
Michael Agwi
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
11
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
37 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Vitaliy Sachko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Elias Ymer
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve %
56%
(
18 of
32)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
37
Total Points Won
26
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Leandro Riedi
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Francesco Passaro
63%
(
77 of
122)
1st Serve %
77%
(
89 of
116)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
51 of
89)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
43%
(
52 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
53 of
116)
123
Total Points Won
115
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lorenzo Giustino
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
46%
(
26 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Tristan Lamasine
65%
(
79 of
121)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
96)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
10
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
38%
(
16 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
44%
(
53 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
50 of
96)
118
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(6) 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aziz Dougaz
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
69%
(
11 of
16)
1st Serve %
67%
(
10 of
15)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
82%
(
9 of
11)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
60%
(
3 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
20
Total Points Won
11
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
101)
6
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
3
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
101)
91
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Denis Yevseyev
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
44 of
77)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
82
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
28 of
36)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
17 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Terence Atmane
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Manda Vs Sachko Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
