Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Caitlin Whoriskey vs Julia Elbaba Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Whoriskey vs Elbaba analysis and find out who is favored!
Caitlin Whoriskey vs Julia Elbaba Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Whoriskey has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Elbaba has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Whoriskey, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Elbaba has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Whoriskey has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Elbaba has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Whoriskey has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Elbaba winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Whoriskey has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 113/ 68), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4). Elbaba has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 11/ 8), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 37% (W/L 10/ 17).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Whoriskey winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Whoriskey winning 2 and Elbaba winning 1. The last match between Whoriskey and Elbaba was at the Surprise, 12-02-2018, Q1 round, Hard with Caitlin Whoriskey getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Whoriskey and Elbaba have played a deciding set 1 times, with Whoriskey winning 1 times and Elbaba 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Whoriskey winning 1, and Elbaba 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Whoriskey has played against opponents with an average rank of while Elbaba has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Whoriskey has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Elbaba has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Whoriskey has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Elbaba has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Whoriskey 1 - 0 Elbaba
Ret.
Rank
268
High
36
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
372
High
29
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
57% (203-152)
Career Total W/L
49% (91-93)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$14,356
Career Prize Money
$610
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Caitlin Whoriskey | Julia Elbaba |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 14 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(2) 1-6 6-1 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Caitlin Whoriskey | Julia Elbaba |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Caitlin Whoriskey Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Usue Maitane Arconada
Player
Caitlin Whoriskey
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shelby Talcott
Player
Caitlin Whoriskey
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
50%
(
36 of
72)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
8
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
6-1 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Genevieve Lorbergs
Player
Caitlin Whoriskey
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
33 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
87)
84
Total Points Won
78
|
1-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Salma Ewing
Player
Caitlin Whoriskey
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
3
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
2
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
48%
(
22 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
45%
(
46 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
92
Total Points Won
89
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caitlin Whoriskey
Player
Francesca Fusinato
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
28 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
84
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-7(3) 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(2) 1-6 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Katherine Sebov
Player
Caitlin Whoriskey
65%
(
70 of
108)
1st Serve %
75%
(
85 of
113)
7
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
57 of
85)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
37%
(
40 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
45 of
113)
113
Total Points Won
108
|
4-6 7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anhelina Kalinina
Player
Caitlin Whoriskey
66%
(
59 of
89)
1st Serve %
65%
(
75 of
115)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
41 of
75)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
58 of
115)
113
Total Points Won
91
|
6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caitlin Whoriskey
Player
Usue Maitane Arconada
62%
(
58 of
93)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
7
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
34%
(
12 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
47%
(
44 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
91
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Julia Elbaba Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 5-7 6-3 10-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Catherine Leduc
Player
Julia Elbaba
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
84
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(9) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lina Glushko
Player
Julia Elbaba
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Polona Hercog
Player
Julia Elbaba
63%
(
73 of
115)
1st Serve %
64%
(
69 of
108)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
45 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
108)
112
Total Points Won
111
|
5-7 7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Polona Hercog
Player
Julia Elbaba
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marie Benoit
Player
Julia Elbaba
48%
(
21 of
44)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rasheeda Mcadoo
Player
Julia Elbaba
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julia Elbaba
Player
Aleksandra Pitak
49%
(
43 of
88)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
84)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
7
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
45%
(
40 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
84)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
5-7 7-5 10-7 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elizabeth Halbauer
Player
Julia Elbaba
74%
(
78 of
105)
1st Serve %
57%
(
64 of
112)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
41%
(
43 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
53 of
112)
115
Total Points Won
102
|
6-7(4) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julia Elbaba
Player
Victoria Smirnova
61%
(
64 of
105)
1st Serve %
53%
(
47 of
89)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
50%
(
32 of
64)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
48%
(
50 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
89)
99
Total Points Won
95
|
7-6(7) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Whoriskey Vs Elbaba Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
