Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann vs Elizabeth Mandlik Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hennemann vs Mandlik analysis and find out who is favored!
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann vs Elizabeth Mandlik Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hennemann has won 45.1% of points on his second serve, while Mandlik has won 45.84%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hennemann, in recent form, has won 55.78% of his opponent's second serve points, while Mandlik has won 55.3%. The same stats for first serve returns are 45.52% and 40.11% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hennemann has saved 50.58% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mandlik has saved 55.33% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hennemann has won 63.49% of matches played (W/L 40/ 23), with Mandlik winning 56.25% (W/L 36/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hennemann has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 14/ 8), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 26/ 17). Mandlik has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 6/ 3), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 14% (W/L 1/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Hennemann has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.29% of matches (W/L 19/ 16), where as Mandlik has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.67% of matches (W/L 17/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hennemann winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Hennemann winning 2 and Mandlik winning 0. The last match between Hennemann and Mandlik was at the W15 Antalya, 10-02-2021, First, Clay with Caijsa Wilda Hennemann getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:11:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hennemann and Mandlik have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hennemann winning 0 times and Mandlik 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hennemann winning 0, and Mandlik 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hennemann has played against opponents with an average rank of 270.32 while Mandlik has played against players with an average rank of 189.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hennemann has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mandlik has won 65% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hennemann has converted 48.52% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mandlik has converted 54.44% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hennemann 1 - 0 Mandlik
444
Rank
283
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
124
Rank
97
High
22
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
62% (154-96)
Career Total W/L
57% (144-109)
74% (20-7)
YTD W/L
17% (1-5)
$0
Career Prize Money
$296,900
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Caijsa Wilda Hennemann | Elizabeth Mandlik |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 2 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:11:0 | 1:11:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (30/47) | 54% (28/52) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (19/30) | 57% (16/28) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 76% (13/17) | 29% (7/24) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (5/12) | 0% (0/3) |
| Return Points W% | 56% (29/52) | 32% (15/47) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-2 |
Stats 
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Caijsa Wilda Hennemann | Elizabeth Mandlik |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 74% (20/7) | 17% (1/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 73% (43/16) | 27% (4/11) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (318/237) | 45% (66/80) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 89% (8/1) | 0% (0/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 73% (8/3) | 25% (1/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.12 | 0.06 |
| Aces Total | 31 | 4 |
| DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.48 |
| DFs Total | 50 | 34 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:31 | 1:50:8 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 282.48 | 165.83 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (1096/1588) | 54% (257/472) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (681/1096) | 58% (150/257) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (219/492) | 41% (88/215) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (124/250) | 60% (28/47) |
| Return Pts W% | 51% (786/1553) | 44% (205/461) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 60% (6/4) | 0% (0/2) |
| Futures W/L | 86% (12/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 74% (20/27) | 17% (1/6) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 91% (22/20) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 9% (22/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (5/0) | 17% (6/1) |
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 2 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Despina Papamichail
Player
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
70%
(
67 of
96)
1st Serve %
70%
(
56 of
80)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
4
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
46%
(
44 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
91
Total Points Won
85
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Louisa Chirico
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
20%
(
4 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Mina Hodzic
76%
(
52 of
68)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Kaitlin Quevedo
Player
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Iva Primorac
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
10
50%
(
22 of
44)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
28 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
43 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Anastasia Iamachkine
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
87%
(
34 of
39)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Mina Hodzic
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
72%
(
42 of
58)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Elizabeth Mandlik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Katarina Zavatska
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Emeline Dartron
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
50%
(
40 of
80)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
41 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Veronica Miroshnichenko
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
62%
(
68 of
109)
1st Serve %
57%
(
71 of
124)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
39%
(
16 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
47%
(
51 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
62 of
124)
120
Total Points Won
113
|
7-5 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Usue Maitane Arconada
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
48%
(
38 of
80)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
48%
(
39 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ella Seidel
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
53%
(
48 of
91)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
5
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
7
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
40 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katie Volynets
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve %
31%
(
12 of
39)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Renata Zarazua
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
74%
(
58 of
78)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Jamie Loeb
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Martina Capurro Taborda
55%
(
57 of
103)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
44 of
74)
61%
(
28 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
42%
(
43 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
49 of
105)
109
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martina Capurro Taborda
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
71%
(
72 of
102)
1st Serve %
59%
(
56 of
95)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
46%
(
47 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
95)
100
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Hennemann Vs Mandlik Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
