S. Imamura
To Win
C. Brace
To Win
Cadence Brace vs Katherine Sebov Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L W W W L W
Form
W L W W W L W L L LH2H: Brace 1 - 0 Sebov
They have played 3 sets in total, with Brace winning 2 and Sebov winning 1. The last match between Brace and Sebov was at the W75 Sumter, 07-06-2025, Round: Semifinals, Surface: Hard, with Cadence Brace getting the victory 7-5 6-7(5) 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Cadence Brace | 1 |
| Katherine Sebov | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W75 Sumter(07-06-2025)
Cadence Brace
Katherine Sebov
7
5
6
7
6
3
| Brace | Stats | Sebov |
|---|---|---|
| 70% (26-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 64% (23-13) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 259 | Ranking | 301 |
| 259 | Highest Rank | 136 |
| 20 | Age | 26 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 1 | Titles | 5 |
| 59% (111-78) | Career Total W/L | 60% (282-191) |
| $4,100 | Career Prize Money | $189,575 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
17 Jul 2025 / Second
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Schoolkate VS Shapovalov PREDICTION Hard
Mifel Tennis Open - Los Cabos atp
18 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Shevchenko VS Bublik PREDICTION Clay
EFG Swiss Open - Gstaad atp
17 Jul 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-7(5) 6-3 |
Stats 
Cadence Brace
Player
Katherine Sebov
52%
(
50 of
97)
1st Serve %
74%
(
88 of
119)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
8
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
45 of
88)
43%
(
20 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
44%
(
43 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
61 of
119)
115
Total Points Won
101
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 19 | Games Won | 15 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 3:8:46 | Average Match Time | 3:8:46 |
| 52% (50/97) | 1st Serve % | 74% (88/119) |
| 68% (34/50) | 1st Serve Win % | 51% (45/88) |
| 43% (20/47) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (13/31) |
| 56% (9/16) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 67% (6/9) |
| 51% (61/119) | Return Points Win % | 44% (43/97) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Brace vs Sebov Match Preview :
- Brace has been slightly more effective, winning 40.43% of points on their second serve in recent months, compared to Sebov's 38.93%. Could this give Brace a slight edge?
- In return games, Brace also surpasses Sebov by winning 49.09% of their opponent's second serve points, whereas Sebov wins 44.7%.
- Sebov shows a stronger performance on first serve returns, with 40.57%, against Brace's 36.84%.
- Under pressure, Sebov has saved more breakpoints (45.42%) than Brace (43.27%). Could this help Sebov in crucial moments?
- Both players have similar match win rates over the past year, with Brace at 65.08% and Sebov at 64.91%.
- Brace excels on hard courts with a 61% win rate, but Sebov shines on indoor hard courts, boasting 68% wins.
- Both players frequently compete in Challengers/ITF > $10K events; Brace has a slight disadvantage in win percentage compared to Sebov.
- Brace faced opponents with an average rank of 456.17, whereas Sebov competed against higher-ranked players averaging 339.84.
- In deciding sets, Sebov has the upper hand, winning 58% of the time, surpassing Brace's 53% win rate in such scenarios.
- Brace is more efficient in converting break point opportunities lately, with a rate of 44.59% against Sebov's 38.46%.
Editorial Prediction (June 7, 2025, UTC):
Brace has demonstrated a marginal advantage in second serve performance and return games, which could play a significant role in this match. Despite Sebov's strength in returning first serves, Brace leads in breakpoint conversion—an element that might tip the scales in tense moments.
Though both players have a comparable win rate over the past year, Sebov holds a slight edge in breakpoint saves under pressure. Additionally, Sebov's advantage in deciding sets suggests a resilience that could be crucial if the match extends.
Taking into account the combination of these performance metrics and current form, Brace exhibits a slight edge over Sebov. Therefore, Brace is anticipated to be the more likely winner of this upcoming match.
Brace vs Sebov Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Cadence Brace Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Cadence Brace
Player
Robin Anderson
63%
(
59 of
93)
1st Serve %
67%
(
61 of
91)
2
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
37 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
94
Total Points Won
90
|
7-5 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Monika Ekstrand
Player
Cadence Brace
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
56%
(
18 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
43%
(
22 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cadence Brace
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
87)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
87)
86
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cadence Brace
Player
Xiaodi You
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
45%
(
40 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
50 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
81
|
5-7 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cadence Brace
Player
Reese Brantmeier
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
0
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mayu Crossley
Player
Cadence Brace
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
103)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
9
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
35%
(
13 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
49%
(
42 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
55 of
103)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
2-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cadence Brace
Player
Victoria Hu
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mayu Crossley
Player
Cadence Brace
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
48%
(
36 of
75)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Katherine Sebov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Haley Giavara
Player
Katherine Sebov
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sahaja Yamalapalli
Player
Katherine Sebov
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
0
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
46%
(
26 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Xiaodi You
Player
Katherine Sebov
57%
(
50 of
87)
1st Serve %
74%
(
61 of
82)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
38 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Katherine Sebov
Player
Liv Hovde
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve %
73%
(
36 of
49)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Cadence Brace
Player
Katherine Sebov
52%
(
50 of
97)
1st Serve %
74%
(
88 of
119)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
8
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
45 of
88)
43%
(
20 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
44%
(
43 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
61 of
119)
115
Total Points Won
101
|
7-5 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Katherine Sebov
Player
Unknown Player
84%
(
65 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
96)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
42%
(
32 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
50 of
96)
95
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Katherine Sebov
Player
Lea Ma
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
45%
(
23 of
51)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katherine Sebov
Player
En Shuo Liang
83%
(
66 of
80)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
95)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
95
Total Points Won
80
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (111/78) | Win/Loss | 60% (282/191) |
| 59% (248/175) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (631/441) |
| 55% (2064/1715) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (5191/4452) |
| 62% (64/40) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (169/116) |
| 57% (34/26) | Clay Win/Loss | 55% (50/41) |
| 52% (13/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (60/30) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 43% (3/4) |
| 0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 228 | Aces Total | 342 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 517 | Total Double Faults | 1045 |
| 1:45:12 | Average Match Time | 1:29:10 |
| 464.31 | Average Opponent Rank | 469.24 |
| 61% (7234/11850) | 1st Serve % | 72% (19843/27616) |
| 62% (4450/7234) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (11571/19843) |
| 47% (2176/4616) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (3607/7771) |
| 53% (759/1441) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1762/3535) |
| 47% (5407/11448) | Return Points Win % | 47% (12795/27045) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 46% (6/7) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 25% (3/9) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 60% (3/2) |
| 75% (3/1) | Main Tour W/L | 47% (8/9) |
| 58% (99/73) | Challenger W/L | 61% (247/158) |
| 69% (9/4) | Futures W/L | 71% (15/6) |
| 59% (109/184) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (277/462) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 49% (17/35) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (48/90) |
| 44% (21/48) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (65/134) |
| 90% (112/101) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (282/243) |
| 10% (112/11) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (282/39) |
| 13% (77/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (190/39) |
Brace vs. Sebov Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
