H. Arakawa
To Win
R. Lacasse
To Win
Cadence Brace vs Haruna Arakawa Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W W L L W L
Form
W W L L L W L W L WHead-2-Head: Brace 1 - 0 Arakawa
They have played 2 sets in total, with Brace winning 2 and Arakawa winning 0. The last match between Brace and Arakawa was at the W50 Spring, 18-02-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Cadence Brace getting the victory 6-3 7-6(4).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Cadence Brace | 1 |
| Haruna Arakawa | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W50 Spring(18-02-2025)
Cadence Brace
Haruna Arakawa
6
3
7
6
| Brace | Stats | Arakawa |
|---|---|---|
| 68% (13-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 42% (10-14) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 302 | Ranking | 514 |
| 296 | Highest Rank | 352 |
| 20 | Age | 25 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 1 | Titles | 3 |
| 57% (98-73) | Career Total W/L | 52% (228-213) |
| $4,100 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
22 May 2025 / Third
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Bulgaru VS Riera PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
23 May 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Klein VS Blanchet PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris atp
23 May 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Cadence Brace
Player
Haruna Arakawa
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
69%
(
53 of
77)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 2:11:54 | Average Match Time | 2:11:54 |
| 60% (49/82) | 1st Serve % | 69% (53/77) |
| 55% (27/49) | 1st Serve Win % | 47% (25/53) |
| 55% (18/33) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (11/24) |
| 50% (6/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (5/11) |
| 53% (41/77) | Return Points Win % | 45% (37/82) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Brace vs Arakawa Match Preview :
Predictions for the Upcoming Tennis Match:
- Recent Form Analysis: A close examination of second serve performance in the past six months reveals that Brace has emerged victorious in 50% of points on their second serve, while Arakawa, exhibiting remarkable skills, has won 48.13%. This particular statistic exhibits a strong correlation with the accuracy of match predictions.
- Return Game Statistics: A careful evaluation of recent return game stats demonstrates the prowess of Brace, triumphing in 60.06% of their opponent's second serve points. On the other hand, Arakawa has also exhibited commendable performance, winning 59.29% in this domain. Similarly, in the context of first serve returns, Brace has proven their mettle with a success rate of 39.5%, whereas Arakawa has achieved 41.95%. Undoubtedly, these statistics play a crucial role in determining the favorite in their head-to-head matchup.
- Under Pressure Analysis: When it comes to dealing with intense pressure, Brace has shown resilience by saving an impressive 54.47% of breakpoints in recent form. Arakawa, not far behind, has demonstrated their ability by saving 53.15%, making this statistic highly valuable for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance Overview: Broadly assessing their performances over the past year, Brace has emerged victorious in 61.67% of matches played, with a win-loss record of 37/23. Meanwhile, Arakawa has maintained a strong winning rate of 57.35% with a win-loss record of 39/29. These figures provide an insightful overview of their head-to-head prediction.
- Preferred Surfaces: Analyzing their career performances on different surfaces, Brace excels on Hard courts, securing a 60% win rate (50/34). Conversely, their performance on Indoor Hard courts dips slightly, with a 54% win rate (13/11). Amazingly, Arakawa thrives on Indoor Hard courts, demonstrating a remarkable win rate of 63% (12/7). However, their performance on Grass courts struggles, without a single victory (0/2).
- Player Level: In the preceding year, Brace has primarily competed in the Challengers/ITF tournaments, where they triumphed in 61.67% of matches (37/23). Similarly, Arakawa showcased their skills in the Challengers/ITF tournaments, securing a victory rate of 57.81% (37/27). When considering the relative statistics between players, the event level at which they have been competing must be taken into account to make an accurate prediction about the favorite.
- Opponent Quality: Evaluating the quality of opponents faced in the last 12 months, Brace encountered opponents with an average rank of 476.75. Conversely, Arakawa's opponents possessed an average rank of 433.85, indicating their ability to challenge higher-ranked players.
- Deciding Set Performance: For those interested in live predictions and betting, it is crucial to consider the players' performance in deciding sets. Brace has displayed an impressive win rate of 43% in deciding sets over the last year, a statistic matched by Arakawa in all matches played on tour. This information proves invaluable in predicting the outcome of matches that extend to a deciding set.
- Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: While historical player performance serves as a valuable predictor, it is equally essential to analyze current event statistics to identify the players in top form. These crucial insights can be found in the designated section below (if applicable). Additionally, certain players tend to excel at specific events, further influencing the predicted outcome.
- Break Point Conversion: Recent analysis reveals that Brace successfully converted 51.85% of their breakpoint opportunities, showcasing their remarkable efficiency. Arakawa, although slightly behind, has also demonstrated prowess, converting 49.25% of chances to break their opponents' serve. These statistics greatly impact in-game betting decisions, especially when either player faces a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you have a keen interest in predictive models for tennis matches, this informative article provides a solid starting point (Note: Recommended for statistical enthusiasts only).
Brace vs Arakawa Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Cadence Brace Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Martina Okalova
Player
Cadence Brace
78%
(
71 of
91)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
0
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
4
52%
(
37 of
71)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
30%
(
6 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
53%
(
48 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
41 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
89
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Cadence Brace
Player
Lia Karatancheva
64%
(
77 of
120)
1st Serve %
68%
(
63 of
93)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
56%
(
43 of
77)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
47%
(
56 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
93)
109
Total Points Won
104
|
4-6 7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Monika Ekstrand
Player
Cadence Brace
61%
(
67 of
109)
1st Serve %
57%
(
56 of
99)
1
Aces
0
12
Double Faults
7
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
43%
(
18 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
49%
(
53 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
50 of
99)
106
Total Points Won
102
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Cadence Brace
51%
(
35 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cadence Brace
Player
Harmony Tan
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
0
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cadence Brace
Player
Marie Villet
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
83%
(
45 of
54)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Iva Jovic
Player
Cadence Brace
54%
(
7 of
13)
1st Serve %
76%
(
16 of
21)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
5 of
7)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
17%
(
1 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
20
Total Points Won
14
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Haruna Arakawa Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Haruna Arakawa
Player
Jessica Hinojosa Gomez
72%
(
53 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
3 of
23)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
49%
(
36 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jada Robinson
Player
Haruna Arakawa
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
5-7 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Haruna Arakawa
Player
Unknown Player
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gergana Topalova
Player
Haruna Arakawa
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
42 of
58)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
50%
(
31 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Haruna Arakawa
Player
Berta Bonardi
75%
(
58 of
77)
1st Serve %
63%
(
66 of
105)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
51%
(
39 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
54 of
105)
92
Total Points Won
90
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexis Nguyen
Player
Haruna Arakawa
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
69%
(
40 of
58)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaeda Daniel
Player
Haruna Arakawa
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve %
77%
(
57 of
74)
0
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
30%
(
9 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
53%
(
42 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
43 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lizette Cabrera
Player
Haruna Arakawa
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
3
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
4
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
30 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (98/73) | Win/Loss | 52% (228/213) |
| 58% (220/161) | Sets Win/Loss | 51% (508/480) |
| 54% (1849/1557) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (4489/4373) |
| 60% (53/36) | Hard Win/Loss | 53% (169/150) |
| 56% (32/25) | Clay Win/Loss | 44% (21/27) |
| 52% (13/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53% (38/34) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 208 | Aces Total | 154 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 454 | Total Double Faults | 880 |
| 1:43:6 | Average Match Time | 1:32:52 |
| 466.12 | Average Opponent Rank | 515.98 |
| 61% (6520/10652) | 1st Serve % | 69% (17062/24884) |
| 61% (4001/6520) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (9528/17062) |
| 47% (1956/4132) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (3488/7824) |
| 52% (668/1285) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1695/3420) |
| 47% (4806/10249) | Return Points Win % | 48% (12008/24971) |
| 75% (3/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 56% (86/68) | Challenger W/L | 48% (161/173) |
| 69% (9/4) | Futures W/L | 63% (67/39) |
| 57% (96/167) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (225/432) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 50% (15/30) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (40/73) |
| 40% (17/43) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (59/113) |
| 91% (98/89) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (231/197) |
| 9% (98/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (231/34) |
| 12% (73/9) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (210/29) |
Brace vs. Arakawa Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
