Cadence Brace vs Carol Zhao Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W W L W W L
Form
W W L W L W W W L LHead-To-Head: Brace 1 - 0 Zhao
They have played 2 sets in total, with Brace winning 2 and Zhao winning 0. The last match between Brace and Zhao was at the W75 Rome, 30-01-2025, Second, I.hard with Cadence Brace getting the victory 6-1 2-0 ret..
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Cadence Brace | 1 |
| Carol Zhao | 0 |
W75 Rome(30-01-2025)
6
1
2
0
| Brace | Stats | Zhao |
|---|---|---|
| 75% (12-4) | YTD Win/Loss | 57% (8-6) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 304 | Ranking | 258 |
| 299 | Highest Rank | 131 |
| 20 | Age | 29 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 1 | Titles | 4 |
| 58% (97-71) | Career Total W/L | 52% (275-253) |
| $4,100 | Career Prize Money | $336,518 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Mensik VS Fritz PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
29 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Pegula PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
28 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 2-0 ret. |
Stats 
Cadence Brace
Player
Carol Zhao
60%
(
9 of
15)
1st Serve %
62%
(
8 of
13)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
6 of
9)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
18
Total Points Won
10
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 8 | Games Won | 1 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 0:21:19 | Average Match Time | 0:21:19 |
| 60% (9/15) | 1st Serve % | 62% (8/13) |
| 67% (6/9) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (4/8) |
| 67% (4/6) | 2nd Serve Win % | 20% (1/5) |
| 25% (1/4) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/3) |
| 62% (8/13) | Return Points Win % | 33% (5/15) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Cadence Brace Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Carson Branstine
Player
Cadence Brace
51%
(
35 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cadence Brace
Player
Harmony Tan
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
0
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cadence Brace
Player
Marie Villet
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
83%
(
45 of
54)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Iva Jovic
Player
Cadence Brace
54%
(
7 of
13)
1st Serve %
76%
(
16 of
21)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
5 of
7)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
17%
(
1 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
20
Total Points Won
14
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cadence Brace
Player
Haruna Arakawa
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
69%
(
53 of
77)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Cadence Brace
Player
Dimitra Pavlou
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
95)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
12 of
41)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
44%
(
41 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
48 of
95)
101
Total Points Won
88
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Victoria Mboko
Player
Cadence Brace
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
6
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
1
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
36%
(
28 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cadence Brace
Player
Lisa Zaar
69%
(
73 of
106)
1st Serve %
91%
(
100 of
110)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
51%
(
37 of
73)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
51 of
100)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
80%
(
8 of
10)
49%
(
52 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
55 of
110)
109
Total Points Won
107
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cadence Brace
Player
Carol Zhao
60%
(
9 of
15)
1st Serve %
62%
(
8 of
13)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
6 of
9)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
18
Total Points Won
10
|
6-1 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Carol Zhao Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Maya Joint
Player
Carol Zhao
54%
(
44 of
82)
1st Serve %
67%
(
71 of
106)
0
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
106)
99
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lanlana Tararudee
Player
Carol Zhao
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
82
Total Points Won
61
|
6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carol Zhao
Player
Ruien Zhang
62%
(
63 of
101)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
95)
1
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
45 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
95)
100
Total Points Won
96
|
7-5 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carol Zhao
Player
Ankita Raina
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Carol Zhao
Player
Hong Yi Cody Wong
66%
(
56 of
85)
1st Serve %
68%
(
53 of
78)
0
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
5
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
31%
(
9 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
52%
(
44 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
42 of
78)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
1-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Fiona Crawley
Player
Carol Zhao
73%
(
67 of
92)
1st Serve %
57%
(
64 of
113)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
9
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
16 of
49)
47%
(
9 of
19)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
43%
(
40 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
63 of
113)
115
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(4) 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carol Zhao
Player
Anna Frey
60%
(
53 of
89)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
88)
2
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
4
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
47%
(
42 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
85
Total Points Won
92
|
1-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF | 6-7(4) 6-4 11-9 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (97/71) | Win/Loss | 52% (275/253) |
| 58% (216/156) | Sets Win/Loss | 50% (621/612) |
| 54% (1807/1511) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (5619/5687) |
| 60% (53/36) | Hard Win/Loss | 51% (161/155) |
| 57% (31/23) | Clay Win/Loss | 57% (67/51) |
| 52% (13/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 51% (38/36) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 45% (9/11) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 207 | Aces Total | 697 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.35 |
| 439 | Total Double Faults | 1951 |
| 1:41:42 | Average Match Time | 1:17:47 |
| 460.18 | Average Opponent Rank | 520.43 |
| 61% (6339/10351) | 1st Serve % | 63% (17962/28450) |
| 62% (3905/6339) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (11054/17962) |
| 47% (1898/4012) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (4401/10488) |
| 52% (648/1246) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (1573/3408) |
| 47% (4660/9956) | Return Points Win % | 44% (12534/28193) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 40% (8/12) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 30% (8/19) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 75% (3/1) | Main Tour W/L | 38% (27/44) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (85/66) | Challenger W/L | 57% (212/162) |
| 69% (9/4) | Futures W/L | 59% (20/14) |
| 58% (95/164) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (271/522) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 48% (14/29) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (53/114) |
| 40% (16/40) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (107/181) |
| 92% (97/89) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (243/207) |
| 8% (97/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (243/36) |
| 11% (71/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (285/68) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
