Bruna Liotto De Carvalho vs Giulia Alessia Monteleone Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 26 May at 07:19 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
B. Liotto De Carvalho vs G. Alessia Monteleone

BRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Carvalho 1 - 0 Monteleone
They have played 3 sets in total, with Bruna Liotto De Carvalho winning 2 and Giulia Alessia Monteleone winning 1. The last match between Bruna Liotto De Carvalho and Giulia Alessia Monteleone was at the W35 Santo Domingo, 26-05-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Bruna Liotto De Carvalho getting the victory 3-6 6-2 10-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Carvalho | 1 |
| Monteleone | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) W35 Santo Domingo(05-26-25)
B. L. D. Carvalho vs G. A. Monteleone H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 30.00% (6-14) | Career Total W/L | 24.21% (23-72) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
B. L. D. Carvalho vs G. A. Monteleone Match Preview:
- Monteleone's second serve effectiveness is slightly better than Carvalho's, with a success rate of 32.42% compared to 31.82%.
- Who performs better in return games? Monteleone shows an edge by winning 54.31% of second serve return points, surpassing Carvalho's 47.22%.
- Carvalho has the advantage in first-serve return points, with 42.45% compared to Monteleone's 29.28%.
- Monteleone displays superior mental toughness under pressure, saving 37.21% of breakpoints versus Carvalho's 32.26%.
- In the past year, Monteleone has managed to win 26.32% of their matches, outpacing Carvalho, who has won just 20%.
- Monteleone is more comfortable on grass, with a 33% win rate, while Carvalho’s performance peaks on clay at 20%.
- Regarding tournament level, Monteleone has participated in higher-level events, boasting a 28.57% success rate at Challengers/ITF > $10K compared to Carvalho's 0% at Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K.
- Monteleone has faced more competitive opponents, with an average rank of 209.42, whereas Carvalho has yet to compete against ranked players.
- When it comes to deciding sets, Monteleone has a 40% win rate, showing more resilience than Carvalho, who has not won any deciding sets.
- Surprisingly, Carvalho is more efficient at converting breakpoints, seizing 61.54% of opportunities against Monteleone’s 44.68%.
Editorial Prediction (May 26, 2025, UTC):
Monteleone displays a marginally better performance in both second serve and return game statistics, which could be pivotal in tight moments during a match.
Although Carvalho excels in breaking serve opportunities, their overall performance, including under-pressure metrics and lack of deciding set wins, suggests vulnerabilities that Monteleone could exploit.
Considering Monteleone's experience with higher-level competitions and the challenge posed by seasoned opponents, they appear better equipped to tackle the upcoming match.
Based on the analyzed data, Monteleone is more likely to emerge victorious in the forthcoming tennis contest.
Bruna Liotto De Carvalho vs Giulia Alessia Monteleone Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
B. L. D. Carvalho vs G. A. Monteleone H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 19 | Games Won | 13 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:17:38 | Average Match Time | 1:17:38 |
| 86% (36/42) | 1st Serve % | 72% (36/50) |
| 33% (12/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 44% (16/36) |
| 0% (0/6) | 2nd Serve Win % | 14% (2/14) |
| 50% (6/12) | Break Pts Won % | 88% (7/8) |
| 64% (32/50) | Return Points Win % | 71% (30/42) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
B. L. D. Carvalho Recent Matches Played
G. A. Monteleone Recent Matches Played

B. L. D. Carvalho vs G. A. Monteleone Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30.00% (6/14) | YTD Win/Loss | 24.21% (23/72) |
| 31.82% (14/30) | Sets Win/Loss | 26.73% (54/148) |
| 38.97% (152/238) | Games Win/Loss | 37.39% (614/1028) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Hard Win/Loss | 22.22% (14/49) |
| 31.58% (6/13) | Clay Win/Loss | 28.00% (7/18) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 25.00% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 0.02 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 3 | Aces Total | 9 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 25 | Total Double Faults | 100 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 81.65 | Average Opponent Rank | 162.49 |
| 78% (524/669) | 1st Serve % | 69% (1600/2327) |
| 45% (237/524) | 1st Serve Win % | 46% (734/1600) |
| 37% (53/145) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (270/727) |
| 61% (39/64) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (113/238) |
| 47% (282/597) | Return Points Win % | 42% (1030/2451) |
| 40.00% (4/6) | Challenger W/L | 31.43% (11/24) |
| 20.00% (2/8) | Futures W/L | 20.00% (12/48) |
| 30% (6/20) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 24% (23/95) |
| 100% (2/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (3/6) |
| 50% (2/4) | Deciding Set Win % | 33% (4/12) |
| 100% (5/5) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (26/21) |
| 0% (5/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (26/5) |
| 7% (15/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 3% (69/2) |